![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
the real plastic
Senior Contributor
|
Peacekeeper vs Trident D-5
http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/peaeeper.htm
http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/trientd5.htm After looking at the stats which would you say is a better nuke. trident advanatges 1.) large payload like the peacekeeper choice from 8-12 MIRV"S or 14 in a shorther range configuration. 2.)Launched from an SSBN which is extremely difficult if not impossible to find. 3.) Launch platform can sneak up close to the enemy's shore as possible giving him less time to react 4.) SLBM's fly a shallower trajectory which alos reduces reaction time. Together this makes reactiopn time significanly less. 5.) accurate as peacekeeper disadvantages 1.) Less range 2.) slower speed 3.) Range decreases as payload increases Peackeeper advantages 1.) 10-12 MIRV payload 2.) cold launch so silo can be reloaded. 3.) High CEP 4.)Max range at max payload 5.) Sexier looking disadvantages 1.) Silo vulnerable to attack 2.) Gives enemy plenty of reaction time since it can be detected as soon as launched and must be launched form US territory and can't sneak near enemy's shore. 3.) higher trjaectory than an SLBM I pick trident! What do you guys think????
__________________
Last edited by urmomma158 : 07-07-2006 at 17:31 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Regular
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
the real plastic
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Senior Contributor
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 10,207
Country:
|
Couple of nuclear tipped TacToms will be enough. No need to alarm our friends and allies with a balistic launch.
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Patron
|
Quote:
A TACTOM or a B-2 can be shot down. A trident with a low yield (15kt) warhead is the wepon of choice for a limited strike. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
the real plastic
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
I guess everyones right,no need to use ICBM"s,SLBMs,B 61's, or ACM 129's on them. TacTOm will be enough. A few of them'll knock the **** out of Iran or North Korea. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Military Professional
|
err... not phallic at all. a sexy missile? it turns you on? what kind of drooling sex pest a) feels that way, and b) admits it to the world?
who loves it up the bum, who loves it up the bum.... (to be sung in the playground to the tune of any nursery ryme you care to mention)
__________________
before criticizing someone, walk a mile in their shoes.................... then when you do criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Distant Deeps or Skies
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
the real plastic
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
For example an A f pilot might think an F 22 is sexy and gets happy when he sees one(not get turned on).Last edited by urmomma158 : 07-19-2006 at 17:14 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
the real plastic
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Inside Trident | Ex MIB | Naval Forces | 15 | 03-23-2007 16:24 PM |
| Blair Relies on Tories for Trident | Ironduke | Political Discussions | 12 | 03-15-2007 16:31 PM |
| Archbishop questions Trident plan | Ironduke | Political Discussions | 3 | 12-05-2006 13:40 PM |
| Trident Vote | PubFather | Political Discussions | 0 | 11-24-2006 16:34 PM |
| trident subs will lose thir invisibility cloak! | urmomma158 | Naval Forces | 79 | 07-06-2006 08:30 AM |