![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Patron
|
Canadian broken wings
It came to my attention just recently. Did anyone know the real agenda behind CF-105 program cancellation? Cause if I am reading the reasons right, at least if what the Canadians said is true, than it is clear that the U.S. cannot call it self a leader of the free world. I mean, forcing an allied country on that way, seems to me too brutal for someone that claims to be top-notch democracy.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Military Professional
|
Quote:
The real agenda was this, the military couldn't afford to develop the Arrow on their own and either needed massive foreign investment or major help from the Canadian Government. Contrary to some popular beliefs of Canadians jet fighters are not cheap to develop. The Canadian Government in the end opted to buy missile interceptors from the U.S rather then continueing development on the Arrow. There are questions regarding this because the two men allegidly made the decision while talking alone together and because there was questions concerning how effective the U.S missile interceptors were. In the end though we lost the Avro Arrow because our own government didn't want to foot the bill. The U.S certainly didn't *force* us to do anything. Last edited by canoe : 07-05-2006 at 14:48 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Patron
|
Wasn't the Arrow being developed at the same time as the British TR-1 and the F-111, during the late 1960s? During the 1960s the F-4 Phantom IIs were the cream of the crop of fighter/bombers.
As the 70s came and went, America developed the F-14, F-15, F-16, and later the F/A-18. The British, Italians, and West Germans developed the Tornado. Canada eventually chose the F/A-18s with a smiliar performance of the F-4, their dual engines providing a safety factor over the broad northern regions of Canada.
__________________
http://homepage.mac.com/donclark/.Public/waglogo.gif |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
New Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Regular
|
Whats most obvious of the Arrow debacle,the Americans don't want Canada building and selling a better aircraft to their potential customers.They apply all sorts of unofficial pressure and coercion,read Skullduggery,who knows who was paid off.Arrow is scrapped,Canadian aerospace industry kicked in the balls,all the talented engineers go south to work for the competition,a few years down the road they sell Canada the the F101 Voodoo.Truly a National disgrace.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| British/American/Canadian Phrases and Spellings | TopHatter | World Affairs Board Pub | 57 | 12-06-2007 23:59 PM |
| Canadian female 16th soldier killed in Afghanistan | Officer of Engineers | Operation Enduring Freedom | 8 | 05-25-2006 20:14 PM |
| My God! Canadian Troops In Iraq Combat | Officer of Engineers | The War in Iraq | 19 | 03-28-2006 16:21 PM |
| Canadian Foreign Affairs diplomat killed in Afghanistan | Officer of Engineers | Operation Enduring Freedom | 5 | 01-16-2006 12:58 PM |
| Are Canadian Forces equipped for Afghan mission? | troung | Operation Enduring Freedom | 20 | 10-26-2005 22:31 PM |