2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Military Aviation
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-05-2006, 13:56 PM   #1 (permalink)
Versus
Patron
 
Versus's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-03-06
Posts: 273
Country:
Canadian broken wings

It came to my attention just recently. Did anyone know the real agenda behind CF-105 program cancellation? Cause if I am reading the reasons right, at least if what the Canadians said is true, than it is clear that the U.S. cannot call it self a leader of the free world. I mean, forcing an allied country on that way, seems to me too brutal for someone that claims to be top-notch democracy.
Versus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2006, 14:43 PM   #2 (permalink)
canoe
Military Professional
 
canoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-13-05
Posts: 698
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Versus
It came to my attention just recently. Did anyone know the real agenda behind CF-105 program cancellation? Cause if I am reading the reasons right, at least if what the Canadians said is true, than it is clear that the U.S. cannot call it self a leader of the free world. I mean, forcing an allied country on that way, seems to me too brutal for someone that claims to be top-notch democracy.
The Avro Arrow was designed as a high speed interceptor to take down Soviet Bombers.

The real agenda was this, the military couldn't afford to develop the Arrow on their own and either needed massive foreign investment or major help from the Canadian Government. Contrary to some popular beliefs of Canadians jet fighters are not cheap to develop.

The Canadian Government in the end opted to buy missile interceptors from the U.S rather then continueing development on the Arrow. There are questions regarding this because the two men allegidly made the decision while talking alone together and because there was questions concerning how effective the U.S missile interceptors were.

In the end though we lost the Avro Arrow because our own government didn't want to foot the bill. The U.S certainly didn't *force* us to do anything.

Last edited by canoe : 07-05-2006 at 14:48 PM.
canoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2006, 15:57 PM   #3 (permalink)
Versus
Patron
 
Versus's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-03-06
Posts: 273
Country:
Ok, I understand that. Sad though, it was an awesome project in many aspects.

Last edited by Versus : 07-06-2006 at 01:50 AM.
Versus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2006, 21:35 PM   #4 (permalink)
jhenthorne_3
New Member
 
Join Date: 07-13-06
Location: Peterborough Ontario Canada
Posts: 11
Send a message via MSN to jhenthorne_3
if it wasn't for the extreme costs. the cf 105 arrow would have been the worlds premier interceptor..it had many firsts in aviation. many of the ppl involved in the project enden up working for NASA or companies such as Lockheed...
jhenthorne_3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2006, 21:58 PM   #5 (permalink)
Sea Toby
Patron
 
Sea Toby's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-24-06
Posts: 223
Wasn't the Arrow being developed at the same time as the British TR-1 and the F-111, during the late 1960s? During the 1960s the F-4 Phantom IIs were the cream of the crop of fighter/bombers.

As the 70s came and went, America developed the F-14, F-15, F-16, and later the F/A-18. The British, Italians, and West Germans developed the Tornado.

Canada eventually chose the F/A-18s with a smiliar performance of the F-4, their dual engines providing a safety factor over the broad northern regions of Canada.
Sea Toby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2006, 22:10 PM   #6 (permalink)
jhenthorne_3
New Member
 
Join Date: 07-13-06
Location: Peterborough Ontario Canada
Posts: 11
Send a message via MSN to jhenthorne_3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sea Toby
Wasn't the Arrow being developed at the same time as the British TR-1 and the F-111, during the late 1960s? During the 1960s the F-4 Phantom IIs were the cream of the crop of fighter/bombers.

As the 70s came and went, America developed the F-14, F-15, F-16, and later the F/A-18. The British, Italians, and West Germans developed the Tornado.

Canada eventually chose the F/A-18s with a smiliar performance of the F-4, their dual engines providing a safety factor over the broad northern regions of Canada.
The arrow was from the late 50's early 60's
jhenthorne_3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2006, 22:47 PM   #7 (permalink)
The_Burning_Kid
Contributor
 
The_Burning_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-07-05
Posts: 444
It was happening around the same time the XB-70 and the XF-108 were being tested or proposed, respectively.
__________________
This message has brought to you by:

F-22 Kicks-A$$.com

*If you clicked that you fell for it :tongue:
The_Burning_Kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2006, 22:12 PM   #8 (permalink)
Visigoth
Regular
 
Visigoth's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-11-04
Posts: 80
Whats most obvious of the Arrow debacle,the Americans don't want Canada building and selling a better aircraft to their potential customers.They apply all sorts of unofficial pressure and coercion,read Skullduggery,who knows who was paid off.Arrow is scrapped,Canadian aerospace industry kicked in the balls,all the talented engineers go south to work for the competition,a few years down the road they sell Canada the the F101 Voodoo.Truly a National disgrace.
Visigoth is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
British/American/Canadian Phrases and Spellings TopHatter World Affairs Board Pub 57 12-06-2007 23:59 PM
Canadian female 16th soldier killed in Afghanistan Officer of Engineers Operation Enduring Freedom 8 05-25-2006 20:14 PM
My God! Canadian Troops In Iraq Combat Officer of Engineers The War in Iraq 19 03-28-2006 16:21 PM
Canadian Foreign Affairs diplomat killed in Afghanistan Officer of Engineers Operation Enduring Freedom 5 01-16-2006 12:58 PM
Are Canadian Forces equipped for Afghan mission? troung Operation Enduring Freedom 20 10-26-2005 22:31 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:43 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8