gunnut

"F" in WW2 was "photo recon" for the AAF. The recon B-29 was officially designated as "F-12" (or F-9...couldn't remember off the top of my head.)

"U" was for "utility" if I remember correctly. Kinda non-descript, perfect for CIA.

That was the last of the Century series fighters. F-4 Phantom was the Navy designation. The AF version was originally F-110.

gunnut

Not to nitpick, but B-50s were not converted B-29s, nor were they jet powered. They were B-29s with structural modifications and a brand new engine, the Wasp Major (a 4-row, 28 cylinder beast) installed.

The Wasp Major was the most powerful aircraft piston engine ever made.

http://www.pw.utc.com/about_history_classic_r4360.asp

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pratt_%26_Whitney_R-4360

hello

Wow, a W-28. B-29s with structural modifications? Well, that means they were converts only. What's the differance? Sorry about the jet part, I think I mixed it up with the B-47 Stratojet. Still, the point of my mentioning remains; the KB designation of the tanker variants still suggests the name "Kerosene Bomber - 50"

gunnut

I think they were strengthened to take the new engine. New manufactures, not converted from existing air frames.

jgetti

The others I can't explain, but the 30's came to be from the JSF technology demonstrator aircraft, the X-35. I believe this came to be because the original ASTOVL and CALF programs which later lead to JSF got the X-aircraft number which actually was in order. The aircraft downselected in CALF was to be designated X-32. As things progressed, Boeing's JSF variant was called the X-32, and Lockheeds was labeled X-35. Years later, Lockheed won JSF and they just changed the X to an F.

Gun Grape

Correct. X-33 and X- 34 were space plane demonstrators.

Now if we were doing the system correctly, the F-35B (VTOL) would be the AFV-24

Gun Grape

I also have the old systems for the services if anyone is interested.

Aircraft Type

G Glider
H Helicopter
Q Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
S Spaceplane
V VTOL/STOL (not used as status until 1962)
Z Lighter-than-air


Basic Mission

A Attack
B Bomber
C Transport
E Special Electronic Installation
F Fighter
L Laser
O Observation
P Patrol
R Reconaissance
S Antisubmarine
T Trainer
U Utility
X Research

Modified Mission

A Attack
C Transport
D Director (formerly G)
E Special Electronics Installation
F Fighter
H Search and Rescue (formerly S)
K Tanker
L Cold weather
M Multimission
O Observation
P Patrol
Q Drone
R Reconnaissance
S Anti-submarine
T Trainer
U Utility
V Staff
W Weather reconnaissance


Q for UAV, L for laser and S for spaceplane are late 80s or 90s additions/modifications.

TopHatter

Wouldn't that be F/AV-24?

__________________
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.
~John Quincy Adams

Gun Grape

No, but the F/A-18 shouldn't be called that either. It should have been the AF-18.

Same with the FB-111. SHould have been a BF-111.

Just cause we have rules doesn't mean we have to follow them

TopHatter

So the rule - if followed - is to place multiple letters in alphabetical order?

Or am I still missing something?

Gun Grape

Missing something.

In the case of the FB-111. By the rules the aircraft basic mission is a bomber. And it has a modified mission as a fighter. When in fact, its just the opposite. The EF-111 was designated properly.

The F/A-18 should have been a F in the 1 seater and a AF in the 2 seat version. This is somewhat corrected in the "G" version. Its designation is the EA-18G basic mission a attack plane (a-18) with a mod mission of electronic warfare E (EA-18)

The F-35B is a VTOL plane and would have a type designation code of V. (v-35),A basic mission as a fighter F (FV-35) and a modified mission as an attack plane A (AFV-35)

TopHatter

Shocking I know.

And that's something that's always bothered me. A bomber? I thought the term bomber was supposed to refer to a strategic (not necessarily meaning nuclear) aircraft that attacked..erm, strategic targets behind enemy lines. I didn't think they intended the F-111 to do that as it's primary mission.

Oh wait, I remember: following the rules even if it's rarely done (like having an exception to virtually every standardized naming scheme in the Navy....USS Hyman G Rickover, USS Henry M Jackson, USS Thomas Gates etc.)

The rules are actually for coming up with NATO reporting names for Soviet equipment. THEN you have to follow them

-{SpoonmaN}-

So what's the deal with the 'tanker' version of the Super-Bug? Is it the F/A-18K, KF-18, KA-18 or what?

hello

That's true. Notice the names of all Russian and Chinese fighters start with "F", bombers with "B", helcopters with "H" and transport with "C". The only deviation is the fact that attack planes are also "F". Space planes are "S".

MiG-21 Fishbed
MiG-23, 27 Flogger
MiG-25 Foxbat
MiG-29 Fulcrum
MiG-31 Foxhound
Su-27, 30, 35, 37 Flanker
Su-32, 34 Fullback
Su-25, 39 Frogfoot
Su-24 Fencer
J-8 Finback

MiG-105 Spiral

Tu-22 Blinder
Tu-22M Backfire
Tu-160 Blackjack

An-72 Coaler
An-124 Condor
An-225 Cossack

J-10, Su-47 haven't been named yet.

hello

There is no dedicated "tanker" version of the Superbug. It's just your average F/A-18E/F carrying 4 tanks under the wings and a buddy tank centerline along with 6 AMRAAMs and 2 Sidewinders for protection. Or this can even be a CAP loadout if you replace the centerline buddy tank with a normal tank. They plan to replace the S-3 with this, though.