2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Military Aviation
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-29-2006, 21:14 PM   #1 (permalink)
urmomma158
the real plastic
Senior Contributor
 
urmomma158's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-05-06
Location: NJ Turnpike
Posts: 938
Country:
F/a 22 Rcs

i know its exact RCs but i would like to know if it changes slightly or dramatically based on wavelength. Its designed for All aspect wideband stealth for a wide spectrum of frequencies like the B-2. So can anyone shed light on this.
urmomma158 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2006, 00:36 AM   #2 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
It's just plain F-22A.

The F/A- designation was dropped many moons ago.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2006, 03:11 AM   #3 (permalink)
hello
Contributor
 
hello's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-31-05
Posts: 683
The F-22 has the RCS of a fly. If any radar could detect the F-22, it would have to detect every fly in the area.

BTW, as Sniper said, the F/A-22 designation was removed back in December 2005. It's been months since then. Now it's F-22A.
hello is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2006, 04:47 AM   #4 (permalink)
Garry
Defense Professional
 
Join Date: 06-18-04
Posts: 1,643
Quote:
Originally Posted by urmomma158
i know its exact RCs but i would like to know if it changes slightly or dramatically based on wavelength. Its designed for All aspect wideband stealth for a wide spectrum of frequencies like the B-2. So can anyone shed light on this.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hello
The F-22 has the RCS of a fly. If any radar could detect the F-22, it would have to detect every fly in the area.

BTW, as Sniper said, the F/A-22 designation was removed back in December 2005. It's been months since then. Now it's F-22A.
Gentelemen. Your knowledge of the most classified US fighter is really funny.

First it was a basket ball, then golf ball. Last time it was a bee.... now Raptror's RSC is downgraded to a fly!!! is it a steel coated fly or just regular fly?
Garry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2006, 11:01 AM   #5 (permalink)
hello
Contributor
 
hello's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-31-05
Posts: 683
You are confused, Garry.

F/A-18E/F = basketball
F-35 = golf ball
B-2 = bee
F-22 = fly

You're RCS ratings for the Raptor are actually those for the SuperHornet, JSF and B-2 Spirit.

hello is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2006, 11:13 AM   #6 (permalink)
Garry
Defense Professional
 
Join Date: 06-18-04
Posts: 1,643
Quote:
Originally Posted by hello
You are confused, Garry.

F/A-18E/F = basketball
F-35 = golf ball
B-2 = bee
F-22 = fly

You're RCS ratings for the Raptor are actually those for the SuperHornet, JSF and B-2 Spirit.

OK. Stand corrected

Lets add there Flanker = a big crowd of bees sitting on a basketball
Garry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2006, 11:18 AM   #7 (permalink)
The_Burning_Kid
Contributor
 
The_Burning_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-07-05
Posts: 444
Well a guy I know compiled a list of RCS of a bunch of aircrafts and then posted them up, including the F-22. Note he said that they are based on rough estimates by a variaty of sources, so you should not take this as actually the real thing. It is just for the ballpark guessing:

Raptor: 0.0002m2
__________________
This message has brought to you by:

F-22 Kicks-A$$.com

*If you clicked that you fell for it :tongue:
The_Burning_Kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2006, 11:31 AM   #8 (permalink)
Garry
Defense Professional
 
Join Date: 06-18-04
Posts: 1,643
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Burning_Kid
he said that they are based on rough estimates by a variaty of sources, so you should not take this as actually the real thing. It is just for the ballpark guessing:

Raptor: 0.0002m2
I remember highsea and jgetty were discussing this issue with lurker..... RSC is quite different from various angles and to various bands. Plus it would vary with different positions of Raptor's own radar antena (highsea assumed that it can fold up in a passive mode).

anyway. Averaging down few speculations do not necceserity give result close to actual data.
Garry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2006, 11:55 AM   #9 (permalink)
urmomma158
the real plastic
Senior Contributor
 
urmomma158's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-05-06
Location: NJ Turnpike
Posts: 938
Country:
True however most sources state this is the actual RCs. Not to mention most people forget that the F/A 22 is all aspect wideband stealth.
http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/hta.../20051125.aspx
http://www.air-attack.com/news/news_article/815

Quote:

* Radar signature approximately the size of a bumblebee, thereby avoiding detection by the most sophisticated enemy air defense systems
* Signatures/emissions of sound, turbulence, and heat that can aid detection are reduced
* Requires no direct assistance from electronic support aircraft that may be more easily detected
* Includes planform alignment of the wing and tail edges, radar-absorbing sawtoothed surfaces, an engine face that is concealed by a serpentine inlet duct, "stealthy" coating cockpit design to minimize the usually substantial radar return of pilot’s helmet
* Through internal weapons placement, the F-22 eliminates multiple surface features that could be detected by enemy radar
Its wideband stealth should allow it to maintain it for a wide range of frequencies at least in the X band targeting band and higher. UHF,VHF,HF, will be larger
Quote:
The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter was a first step in the stealth reformation. Planners are considering abandoning the radar blocker in the exhaust with the idea that the 5-deg. cone of vulnerability out the aircraft's tail was an acceptable risk given the altitude at which it would fly (a margin of safety provided by the use of precision weapons). Its overall radar signature, for example, is about -30 dBsm. (the radar reflection of a golf ball) in most directions compared with -40 dBsm. (a marble) for the F/A-22. (AW&ST Aug. 27, 2001, p. 34).
http://www.aviationnow.com/avnow/sea...2F04045p02.xml

wideband stealth......http://www.ausairpower.net/0915-ADM-Rebuttal.pdf

i can give more sources concerining wideband stealth if you want guys.

Last edited by urmomma158 : 04-30-2006 at 12:01 PM.
urmomma158 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2006, 12:00 PM   #10 (permalink)
The_Burning_Kid
Contributor
 
The_Burning_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-07-05
Posts: 444
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garry
I remember highsea and jgetty were discussing this issue with lurker..... RSC is quite different from various angles and to various bands. Plus it would vary with different positions of Raptor's own radar antena (highsea assumed that it can fold up in a passive mode).

anyway. Averaging down few speculations do not necceserity give result close to actual data.
Yeah I forgot to add that is frontal aspect. Indeed, the RCS changes from the position you are looking at an aircraft.

Also like I said, this gives a general ballpark not the accurate thing. A good starting point, if you ask me.
The_Burning_Kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2006, 12:35 PM   #11 (permalink)
urmomma158
the real plastic
Senior Contributor
 
urmomma158's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-05-06
Location: NJ Turnpike
Posts: 938
Country:
Wellduh so what do you think of my previous post.
urmomma158 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2006, 11:33 AM   #12 (permalink)
highsea
Defense Professional
 
highsea's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-10-04
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,585
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garry
...Plus it would vary with different positions of Raptor's own radar antena (highsea assumed that it can fold up in a passive mode).
Garry, you misunderstood my post.

I will try to find a pic so it's more clear.
__________________
My baby called me up. She said- Why don't you ever take me out? Pick me up in your brand new car....You shake the short change from the old fruit jar...
highsea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2006, 12:51 PM   #13 (permalink)
Captain Drunk
Banished
 
Captain Drunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-02-06
Location: Goa, India
Posts: 825
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garry
Gentelemen. Your knowledge of the most classified US fighter is really funny.

First it was a basket ball, then golf ball. Last time it was a bee.... now Raptror's RSC is downgraded to a fly!!! is it a steel coated fly or just regular fly?
No, more precisely......a "hornet"
Captain Drunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2006, 13:07 PM   #14 (permalink)
highsea
Defense Professional
 
highsea's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-10-04
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,585
Quote:
Originally Posted by urmomma158
...i know its exact RCs...
You don't know sh*t, son.
highsea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2006, 13:24 PM   #15 (permalink)
highsea
Defense Professional
 
highsea's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-10-04
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,585
Quote:
Originally Posted by highsea
...I will try to find a pic so it's more clear.
Here you go, Garry. This is a pic of the APG-79, but the -77 front array is oriented the same way. The array is fixed, so it doesn't "fold up" when passive. What I was saying is that it is angled upwards, which redirects backscatter from the antenna away from the emitter and up into the sky.

So to get a return from the antenna, the emitter has to be in front of, and above the AC. This is not really a safe place to be if you're hunting Raptors!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg apg79.jpg (76.7 KB, 90 views)

Last edited by highsea : 05-01-2006 at 13:26 PM.
highsea is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is the SU-30MKI the worlds best fighter? platinum786 Military Aviation 208 08-29-2008 12:49 PM
LCA beats F-16 Mr_Vastu Military Aviation 137 08-27-2008 14:00 PM
F-22, stuff you should know Rusky Military Aviation 275 09-21-2007 01:19 AM
Fighter Radar Ranges canoe Military Aviation 6 07-27-2006 19:47 PM
SU 30MKI Vs Rafale uss Military Aviation 29 08-03-2005 00:18 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:07 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8