2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Military Aviation
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-02-2003, 21:17 PM   #1 (permalink)
Sparky
Regular
 
Join Date: 09-12-03
Location: Illinois USA
Posts: 50
3CU inch 3 HP diesil engines?

I was reading the online version of the Aerospace Daily the other day and it mentioned they had dumped the contractor for batteries for the Army's new UAV surveilance system that would fly out to a predetermined location using GPS or other means and land or perch itself on say a hil or other good viewing location and begin surveilance. When done it would start up again and return to base.

It was supposed to be battery powered but the lithium batteries supplied by the contractor didn't meet spec and the UAV did not have enough power to rise up again and return to base. This would have made it a one way trip.

They opted to dump the batteries altogether and go with a diesil engine. The engine when built is supposed to be only 3 cubic inches in volume and the entire UAV is only 11.5 inch wide as it's required to fit in a standard back pack so that troops can carry it without much difficulty. The estimated and required horsepower for this little engine is supposed to be 2.5 to 3 HP.
Sparky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2003, 01:59 AM   #2 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,973
Country:
Diesel? I don't think it would be possible to make an engine that small, lol.
__________________
The Buck Stops Here
Ironduke is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2003, 19:40 PM   #3 (permalink)
Sparky
Regular
 
Join Date: 09-12-03
Location: Illinois USA
Posts: 50
Well the M! Abrams tank engine even though it is supposedly a "Jet engine" it runs multiple fue types and can therefore be considered a Diesel of sorts. Maybe this UAV has something similar.

I just read today the new navy X-ship or UAV carrier with 100 meter take off and landing area is supposed to cruise at 50 knots. Thats one FAST UAV carrier.
Sparky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2006, 16:39 PM   #4 (permalink)
omon
Field mechanik
Senior Contributor
 
omon's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-01-06
Location: bk
Posts: 2,058
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironduke View Post
Diesel? I don't think it would be possible to make an engine that small, lol.
it is posible, they say diesel but it realy is not diesel it has the same way of igniting fuel (which is not diesel fuel) compression,they run on some nasty stuf a mix of ether that dentists used to use, kerosine and castor oil,It stinks too.
i made many flying models of planes from the skrach in my young days ,they used different "diesels" with displasment of ; from 1,5 cubik sm, to 10 qubik sm, 1 sm=10mm.

Last edited by omon : 12-09-2006 at 04:54 AM.
omon is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2006, 06:37 AM   #5 (permalink)
IflareR
New Member
 
Join Date: 12-10-06
Posts: 9
it most likely means compression ignited piston engine. all campression ignited engines are called diesel engines because of Rudolf Diesel who invented it. correct name for gas powered spark ingition piston engine would be otto engine(Nicolaus Otto invented 4-stroke gas engine as we know it). so eaven if it doesnt use diesel fuel but some other compression ignitable fuel it is a diesel engine. and small 2-stroke diesels are commonly used in model cars/plans etc.

and gas turbine(eaven if its capable of burning diesel fuel) and diesel engine have nothing in common. other is reciprocating and other is continous burn. true apples to oranges comparison.
IflareR is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Now, MiG engines may light homes Tronic Political Discussions 9 04-13-2008 11:04 AM
China's general economy info oneman28 International Defense Topics 138 05-27-2006 10:31 AM
F-15C vs. Su-30MKI Ironduke Military Aviation 289 10-08-2005 16:03 PM
Russia to supply Engines for Indian Trainers. vicky007 South Asian Defense Topics 20 09-14-2005 05:23 AM
F-16C Block 52 vs. Mig-29S Praxus Military Aviation 34 01-25-2005 12:05 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:10 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8