![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |
|
Defense Professional
|
Quote:
One is on display in the Air Museum in San Diego, California. It is hanging quite high up from the ceiling so it looks full size. Also, if my memory is correct, a couple of the kit-built single seat Stukas were used in making the movie "Battle of Britain". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Defense Professional
|
As to my personal choice, I'm too old to take the G forces of a fighter plane and I would just want something to get me around that didn't use too much fuel.
So I would pick the Cessna Skymaster. It was a twin-boomed, twin-engine (one pull prop and one pusher), high-winged airplane that can carry up to four people. They were used in Viet Nam as spotting planes and once in a while some were equipped with machineguns for general strafing. I used to fly small single-engine Cessnas but was always impressed with the Skymaster. I was offered once to fly a P-51 Mustang. But I had to decline because the offer was only good if I topped of the fuel tanks after landing and my credit union wouldn't cover a loan for that much. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Regular
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) |
|
Senior Contributor
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,750
Country:
|
Maybe. But didn't some smartass think it was a good idea to swap out the Allison in the Mustang for the Merlin? I mean the damn thing barely worked after that... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) | |
|
New Member
|
Quote:
That woulda sure been something. ![]() Ironically, the next unused variant model for the P-38 would've been "M". I guess it was just too obvious? LOL... If i could have anyone aircraft and maintenance/fueling costs were not an issue, i think i'd have to go with a stripped F-16C Block32 GE "Big mouth" Falcon. The ultimate lightweight hotrod. ![]() Last edited by Anon : 03-01-2006 at 00:46 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) | |
|
Contributor
|
Quote:
Can that thing really fly?Where are its wings? ![]() Horrido: Sorry, Hello, tried to respond and hit "edit" instead. I think I've restored it. Last edited by Horrido : 03-01-2006 at 03:15 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) |
|
Staff Emeritus
Chief Subversive |
On the P-38-issue, I'd like to put C-130 engines in it, and swap-out the guns for a .50 gatling and small radar gunsight. OUCH!
Could've sworn I had pictures of a Merlin Lightning somewhere. They were thinking about putting them on floats.
__________________
The black flag is raised: Ban them all... Let the Admin sort them out. I know I'm going to have the last word... I have powers of deletion and lock.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Iraq in Books - Review Essay | Shek | The War in Iraq | 9 | 02-29-2008 06:08 AM |
| Principles of War for the Battlefield of the Future | Ray | The Field Mess | 2 | 11-05-2006 10:42 AM |
| Mullah's leading the charge... | troung | The Field Mess | 11 | 03-28-2006 10:59 AM |
| Who needs the USN? | rickusn | Naval Forces | 10 | 07-05-2005 00:47 AM |
| IAF purchasing more and more. | ajaybhutani | South Asian Defense Topics | 54 | 04-20-2005 09:05 AM |