LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With QuoteOkay, eh...a SOLID source?Originally Posted by The_Burning_Kid
Here you go:
http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/hta.../20051125.aspx
Okay, eh...a SOLID source?
That is a solid source.
Thats redneck.com if i remember correctly.
That's your perspective. It might be bias, but this is one of those things that is just hard fact. I don't see how you could be bias on something like this.
I read some of their posts, they are biased to the core, i am not going through a brain washing, no thanks. I really don't have to beat you, i know i can't, you guys will never change your views, you're too fed up with all this nonsense. In the end of the day i am still right so i am just going to stick to the truth. Its my mistake posting on an american forum in the first place.
Last edited by Rusky; 21 Jan 06, at 03:06.
It can be yellow press. Either way, get me another source.
Basically, the favouritism shown for the MigGeEz and F-teenz only shows the Titanicish 'Even God can't sink this ship' attitude each one has for their nations' planes. Mostly it's always Western sources on the internet that state superiority owned by Russian fighters
Jgetti and Highseas are brainwashed eh? Must've been their years working as aerospace proffessionals i guess....????
LOL. You are right though, you belong on a russian forum. I am sure you are much more popular spouting off your defense pamphlet statistics there.
I can tell you that its not but of course you not changing your mind. But whatever your majesty:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...22-stealth.htm
Scroll to second paragraph, and at the bottom:
"While not invisible, the F-22's radar cross section is comparable to the radar cross sections of birds and bees."
Though not the same, GlobalSecurity.org is pretty credible source along with that the F-22's RCS from the other source is in similar size to the one just listed, I don't see what's fake. As for the actual RCS of the F-22:
0.0002m2
I'm actually going to talk to the guy that posted this a while ago, but I know he's considered quite an expert and knows a ton of stuff on aircrafts (think he has a degree in it but not sure), so I'll get back to you on that.
Oh, so this is not the brochure stuff? You guys i see got your own little set of double standars.
Actually no its not. Its from a credible source, GlobalSecurity.org.
I know that, the thing is whenever i bring up numbers from credible sources M21 will jump in and say that i read too many prochures and it all doesn't matter cause he says so.
Well, I'm not slamming you, but I've never heard of your sources while almost plenty of people have heard of GlobalSecurity. If you do a search for a military unit in Google, it usually comes up on the first page.
Doesn't make my sources any less credible though. Also i was mostly refering to the little tank discussion we been having with him, that reply of mine was more of a stab at him then anyone else.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Share this thread with friends: