![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#271 (permalink) |
|
Contributor
|
Why do you think the Typhoon would win?
It's a who sees the other guy first deal, and head-on there's about as much of a Raptor to see as there is of a Typhoon. The Typhoon might have an advantage here with its IRST (first look), assuming that thing can scan a large enough sector fast enough. But other than that ... both have high off-bore missiles ... it's a bit of a toss-up. Then again, I don't see why either would be running silent; an F-22 would be getting fed info from other F-22's or other sources, and the tiffy would be doing a lot of the same. The difference is, 'I can see you, but you can't see me' ... |
|
|
|
|
|
#273 (permalink) | |||
|
Contributor
|
Correct. Ever heard of 'you get what you pay for?'
Quote:
Quote:
The F-22 has a very high TWR and thrust vectoring, the first one giving it a high sustained turning rate and acceleration, the latter enhanced maneuverability on top of all that. Furthermore, an F-22 flies -clean-, whereas an EF must fly with external stores, adding some drag and thus reducing its effective TWR. Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#274 (permalink) |
|
Military Professional
|
You realize simulations run by the Brits gave the Raptor a 10 to 1 kill ratio against Su-35s launching AA-12 missiles, and the Typhoon "only" racked up a 4.5 to 1 kill ratio against the same, right?
Editted to reflect the actual results, not random BS I thought I remembered, haha. Last edited by Jimmy : 09-20-2007 at 22:28 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#275 (permalink) | |
|
Military Professional
|
Quote:
Trust me, the machine is of secondary importance to the man in it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#276 (permalink) |
|
Patron
|
RE: F-22, stuff you should know
The Typhoon Test Pilot Craig 'Butz' Penrice described how he envisioned two aircraft would be used in an interview. He said, NATO/USAF/RAF's current plan to use the F-22 is, the F-22 would go over the opposition's territory ahead of a strike group and kill any organized opposition/ interceptors as they rise to meet the strike package. The Typhoon would attack any interceptors that would try and get to close to the strike package.
The F-22 would go ahead of the strike package because of its unique capabilities which allow it to do so. Adrian |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Stuff that'll make you laugh! | Maximus | World Affairs Board Pub | 3 | 02-15-2007 07:40 AM |
| Your Thoughts on David Icke? | joey2 | World Affairs Board Pub | 12 | 12-29-2006 07:55 AM |
| The Stuff of Life | Leader | Science & Tech | 3 | 10-05-2005 16:46 PM |
| Soviet guns in Afghanistan (interview) | troung | Small Arms and Personal Weapons | 44 | 08-30-2005 23:55 PM |
| Whatever This Guys Is "high" On, Its Good Stuff! | visioninthedark | International Defense Topics | 4 | 10-18-2004 05:04 AM |