2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Military Aviation
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-20-2007, 00:24 AM   #271 (permalink)
GGTharos
Contributor
 
Join Date: 10-06-06
Posts: 357
Why do you think the Typhoon would win?
It's a who sees the other guy first deal, and head-on there's about as much of a Raptor to see as there is of a Typhoon. The Typhoon might have an advantage here with its IRST (first look), assuming that thing can scan a large enough sector fast enough.

But other than that ... both have high off-bore missiles ... it's a bit of a toss-up.

Then again, I don't see why either would be running silent; an F-22 would be getting fed info from other F-22's or other sources, and the tiffy would be doing a lot of the same.

The difference is, 'I can see you, but you can't see me' ...
GGTharos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 11:02 AM   #272 (permalink)
EAGLE22
Banished
 
Join Date: 09-06-07
Posts: 27
put theres the first point...

for one F-22 you get two EF2000's, but Eurofighter has IRST (f-22 not), Eurofighter has more agility, those are both good advantages for the half price.

USAF has to think about it.
EAGLE22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 12:48 PM   #273 (permalink)
GGTharos
Contributor
 
Join Date: 10-06-06
Posts: 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by EAGLE22 View Post
for one F-22 you get two EF2000's
Correct. Ever heard of 'you get what you pay for?'

Quote:
but Eurofighter has IRST (f-22 not)
Correct, but not terribly relevant; the F-22 will simply use its radar instead, and reliably track both EF's at the same time, and attack both at the same time. Further more, radar capability far out-ranges the IRST ... and missiles out-range the IRST also (when used to detect fighters head-on)

Quote:
Eurofighter has more agility,
Definitely incorrect. Who told you that? :D
The F-22 has a very high TWR and thrust vectoring, the first one giving it a high sustained turning rate and acceleration, the latter enhanced maneuverability on top of all that. Furthermore, an F-22 flies -clean-, whereas an EF must fly with external stores, adding some drag and thus reducing its effective TWR.


Quote:
those are both good advantages for the half price.

USAF has to think about it.
I think they already have. That's why the F-22 is a frightening air to air monster.
GGTharos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 19:42 PM   #274 (permalink)
Jimmy
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 11-16-05
Posts: 997
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by EAGLE22 View Post

USAF has to think about it.
You realize simulations run by the Brits gave the Raptor a 10 to 1 kill ratio against Su-35s launching AA-12 missiles, and the Typhoon "only" racked up a 4.5 to 1 kill ratio against the same, right?

Editted to reflect the actual results, not random BS I thought I remembered, haha.

Last edited by Jimmy : 09-20-2007 at 22:28 PM.
Jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 23:25 PM   #275 (permalink)
wabpilot
Military Professional
 
wabpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-05-03
Location: Commuting between Dresden and Ft. Worth
Posts: 558
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Indirect Fire View Post
What if both planes are running silently, and attack each other based on visual contact?

In this scenario, is the Typhoon more likely to win due to its small size, and CA, or will the F22 due to its tech.
Whichever plane is flown by the freak with the strongest set of reading glasses.

Trust me, the machine is of secondary importance to the man in it.
wabpilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2007, 01:19 AM   #276 (permalink)
avon1944
Patron
 
Join Date: 04-26-05
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 281
RE: F-22, stuff you should know

The Typhoon Test Pilot Craig 'Butz' Penrice described how he envisioned two aircraft would be used in an interview. He said, NATO/USAF/RAF's current plan to use the F-22 is, the F-22 would go over the opposition's territory ahead of a strike group and kill any organized opposition/ interceptors as they rise to meet the strike package. The Typhoon would attack any interceptors that would try and get to close to the strike package.
The F-22 would go ahead of the strike package because of its unique capabilities which allow it to do so.

Adrian
avon1944 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stuff that'll make you laugh! Maximus World Affairs Board Pub 3 02-15-2007 07:40 AM
Your Thoughts on David Icke? joey2 World Affairs Board Pub 12 12-29-2006 07:55 AM
The Stuff of Life Leader Science & Tech 3 10-05-2005 16:46 PM
Soviet guns in Afghanistan (interview) troung Small Arms and Personal Weapons 44 08-30-2005 23:55 PM
Whatever This Guys Is "high" On, Its Good Stuff! visioninthedark International Defense Topics 4 10-18-2004 05:04 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:14 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8