Pffft, Wolf, you have no excuse not to know better...![]()
Washington Times
August 11, 2005
Pg. 15
'Ratline' Offensive
By Jack Kelly
The 14 Marine reservists killed last week when the amtrac in which they were riding was struck by a powerful roadside bomb would have been safer if they had been riding in up-armored humvees, opined CNN anchor Wolf Blitzer.
"I’m very disappointed that we don’t have the good vehicles in the al Anbar province," Mr. Blitzer said. "It’s a very sensitive issue for me, because I was there in March."
An amtrac with 15 combat-loaded Marines aboard weighs more than 23 tons. The improvised explosive device (IED) — reportedly made from a 500 lb. bomb — flipped it over like a toy. An up-armored humvee weighs less than four tons. Only an idiot would deem it more survivable, especially since an amtrac has more armor than an up-armored humvee.
Mr. Blitzer, alas, is typical of the near perfect ignorance of most in the news media about matters military. Journalists assert that if the enemy can inflict casualties upon us, we must be losing.
The bad guys are building bigger bombs, and hiding them better, so that even though the number of IED attacks has declined, the casualties inflicted by each attack has been rising. This is worrisome.
But no armed force whose principal weapon is the mine can possibly be winning militarily. You can’t take the war to the enemy with a mine. You have to wait for the enemy to come to you.
We have, at this writing, suffered 1,831 dead since the invasion of Iraq in March, 2003. I fear we will suffer 200-300 more before the war is effectively turned over to the Iraqis by the autumn or winter of 2006.
Each of these deaths is a tragedy. But it’s important to remember the number of deaths in this war is amazingly low by historical standards. We lost more than 58,000 in Vietnam; more than 34,000 in Korea. In the last two battles of the Pacific War; we lost nearly 7,000 on Iwo Jima and 12,000 on Okinawa.
It is curious to cover a war by emphasizing friendly casualties, without reporting the context in which they occur. On June 5, 1944, our casualties in the European theater were low. The next day June 6, they were much higher. But what was important about June 6, 1944, was not that our casualties rose, but that the Normandy invasion was successful.
Casualties rise when one side goes on the offensive. Typically, it is the side that is on the offensive that is winning. We currently are engaged in the biggest offensive since the fall of Fallujah, striking simultaneously at insurgent strongholds along the Tigris and Euphrates "ratlines" along which al Qaeda terrorists infiltrate from Syria.
This could be the climactic campaign of the war. But while most Americans know 14 Marines were killed in a single incident last week, few have heard of Operation Quick Strike, of which they were a part.
About 1,800 U.S. soldiers and Marines, and about 1,000 Iraqis are taking part in Operation Quick Strike.
The Stryker brigade of the Army’s 2nd Infantry Division moved south from Mosul to seize control of the Rawah bridge over the Euphrates. This (largely) denies insurgents freedom of movement between the Tigris and the Euphrates, cuts their major supply line, and sits astride the principal avenue of escape.
The Marines, with significant participation by Iraqis, simultaneously are attacking three towns on the banks of the Euphrates — Haditha (for which the ill-fated amtrac was headed), Halqiniyah and Barwana—that the insurgents pretty much have had the run of for the last two years.
"This operation is meant to sever the operational rear of the insurgency," said Web logger Josh Manchester, a Marine veteran of the Iraq war.
"Terrorists will have to choose — to die in battle, to flee to Syria, or to displace further and further east as the coalition steamrollers behind them."
The only major news organization to report much about Operation Quick Strike has been The Los Angeles Times, and then only toward the end of stories which begin, predictably enough, with reports of U.S. casualties.
If the crepe hangers weren’t so busy hanging crepe, they might have noticed the locus of action has shifted steadily away from the populated areas, steadily closer to the Syrian border.
But for this to be reported by CNN, someone would have to teach Wolf Blitzer how to read a map. Some tasks are too difficult even for the U.S. military.
Jack Kelly a syndicated columnist, is a former Marine and Green Beret and a former deputy assistant secretary of the Air Force in the Reagan administration. He is national security writer for the Pittsburgh (Pa.) Post-Gazette.
Pffft, Wolf, you have no excuse not to know better...![]()
I hate how smug and all-knowing the people in the leftist media think they are when it comes to the art of war.
"The right man in the wrong place can make all the difference in the world. So wake up, Mr. Freeman. Wake up and smell the ashes." G-Man
For starters, Wolf Blitzer may not have gotten Vince MacMahon's memo to the leftist media i.e. "go to hell". Perhaps he should try harder?...Originally Posted by M21Sniper
I've never really noticed any overt liberal bias from Wolf Blitzer, hs is however an ignorant and pompus ass.
"We always have been, we are, and I hope that we always shall be, detested in France."
-Sir Arthur Wellesley
He works for CNN. I think it is a prerequisite to be liberally biased.Originally Posted by Wraith601
A truely wise man has more questions to ask than answers to give.
Lou Dobbs works for CNN and he's not what I'd call liberal. Headline News used by extrmely good for straight reporting awith little editorializing but it's nothing but an E! clone now, pity. The regular CNN is nothing more than a mouthpiece for Ted Turner now and I don't get MSNBC or Fox News on basic cable so I make do.Originally Posted by clovely81
"We always have been, we are, and I hope that we always shall be, detested in France."
-Sir Arthur Wellesley
That's a pity...I always love it when Bill O'Reilly rips idiots a new oneOriginally Posted by Wraith601
![]()
A truely wise man has more questions to ask than answers to give.
Had to go back over this one.
"Runnin' the 'ratlines'" has been a GREAT success. We've been starting to really appreciate how good we did. After getting some distance and time between the event and now, we can take stock and evaluate it.
Helluva nice couple of weeks. Should pay off big in the future, too.![]()
"The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it, and if one finds the prospect of a long war intolerable, it is natural to disbelieve in the possibility of victory."
- George Orwell
Y'all see the latest? Greased the aQ commander in Mosul today.
Wish I'd been a part of that one, but I was chasin' Lt. Bluesman around the sofa (and lettin' her CATCH me!).
"The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it, and if one finds the prospect of a long war intolerable, it is natural to disbelieve in the possibility of victory."
- George Orwell
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Share this thread with friends: