Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Rumsfeld says Iraq insurgency may last for years.

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    17 Jan 05
    Posts
    57

    Rumsfeld says Iraq insurgency may last for years.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/26/po...nd-policy.html


    Rumsfeld Speaks Cautiously on Strength of Insurgency

    By BRIAN KNOWLTON
    International Herald Tribune
    Published: June 26, 2005
    WASHINGTON, June 26 - Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld insisted today that United States-led forces were making significant progress in Iraq, but he spoke with deliberate caution about how long and forcefully insurgents were likely to resist and noted that such resistance movements can last a dozen years.

    "The insurgency will be put down by the Iraqi people over time," Mr. Rumsfeld said on "Fox News Sunday." "It won't be won by the coalition forces."[ He added that "insurgencies tend to go on 5, 6, 8, 10, 12 years." And violence, he said, might increase ahead of national elections set for December.

    But Mr. Rumsfeld expressed nothing but certainty about the final outcome: The insurgents, he said, were "losers, and they're going to lose."

    Mr. Rumsfeld's appearances on three television programs, and the appearances of Gen. John Abizaid, the military commander responsible for Afghanistan and Iraq, on two other programs seemed intended to lay the groundwork for a major prime-time speech on Tuesday by President Bush. Both Mr. Rumsfeld and General Abizaid sought to sound reassuring tones, while preparing the public for a long and difficult struggle.

    Some in Congress have sharpened their criticism of the war and called for the administration to outline a clear strategy for withdrawal. In one exchange last week, Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts suggested to Mr. Rumsfeld, and not for the first time, that he resign. Meanwhile, opinion polls show public confidence in the war at all-time lows.

    Mr. Bush said Friday that he was "not giving up on the mission." He is expected to ask Americans for patience and forbearance.

    General Abizaid expressed calm confidence today about the war but cautioned against hoping for short-term results.

    "There's no way the United States military in either Iraq or Afghanistan is going to be pushed into the sea," he said on the CBS News program "Face the Nation." "The insurgents don't have a chance."

    He said that Iraqi forces could begin taking a lead role by next spring or summer, but that reductions in American forces would probably not come for a year after that.

    "We don't kneed to have the same number of troops in the region 10 years from now or 5 years from now or even 2 years from now," said General Abizaid, who heads the United States Central Command.

    Mr. Rumsfeld, expressing similar confidence, characterized the insurgents as outsiders with scant domestic support.

    Unlike past revolutions in Vietnam and China, he said, there was no charismatic national leader. "There is no Ho Chi Minh or Mao there," he said. "There's a Jordanian terrorist who's killing Iraqi people," a reference to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, who is considered a leader of the insurgency.

    Moreover, Mr. Rumsfeld said, the insurgents' ability to kill large numbers of people was a poor indicator of Iraqi support for their cause.

    "It doesn't take a genius to go blow up a restaurant," he said on Fox. "A kid with a suicide vest can kill a lot of people."

    He described overall progress in Iraq as "solid," adding: "It's amazing. It's historic."

    Mr. Rumsfeld was asked to square a comment last week by Vice President Dick Cheney, who said that the insurgency was in its "last throes," with General Abizaid's testimony on Thursday to Congress that the insurgency's "overall strength is about the same" as six months earlier and that the flow of anti-American fighters into the country had grown.

    Mr. Rumsfeld, noting that the word "throes" can encompass violent spasms, said that there was "no contradiction at all" between Mr. Cheney's and General Abizaid's comments.

    Mr. Rumsfeld was also asked about the accusations of abuse of detainees at the United States base at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. He categorically denied that there was "any policy of abuse or policy of torture."

    "There have been, I believe, 50 convictions of people for not obeying the rules that have been established," he said on Fox News. "The prisoners in Guantánamo Bay are being treated humanely.

    "The idea that there's any policy of abuse or policy of torture is false, flat false."


    Mr. Rumsfeld also confirmed, but played down, a British press report that American officials had negotiated recently with Iraqi insurgents in two meetings in a villa north of Baghdad.


    "Sure, my goodness, yeah," Mr. Rumsfeld said of a report about the meetings in The Sunday Times of London. "The first thing you want to do is split people off and get some people to be supportive. The same thing's going on in Afghanistan."

    But he added, "I would not make a big deal out of it."

    Both Mr. Rumsfeld and General Abizaid suggested that the meetings were intended largely to improve contacts with Sunni Muslims in central Iraq - where the insurgency has proved most intractable - to urge them to play a larger role in the political process.

    But this, General Abizaid said on CBS, "doesn't mean we're talking to people like Zarqawi."

    Such meetings were reported early this year by Time magazine.

  2. #2
    Staff Emeritus Confed999's Avatar
    Join Date
    10 Sep 03
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    10,026
    Seems obvious, but ok.
    No man is free until all men are free - John Hossack
    I agree completely with this Administration’s goal of a regime change in Iraq-John Kerry
    even if that enforcement is mostly at the hands of the United States, a right we retain even if the Security Council fails to act-John Kerry
    He may even miscalculate and slide these weapons off to terrorist groups to invite them to be a surrogate to use them against the United States. It’s the miscalculation that poses the greatest threat-John Kerry

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Why We Are in Iraq
    By Leader in forum Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation New Dawn
    Replies: 139
    Last Post: 07 Nov 10,, 15:46
  2. The Causes & Consequences of Strategic Failure in Afghanistan & Iraq
    By lulldapull in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 20 May 08,, 08:48
  3. Iraq in Books - Review Essay
    By Shek in forum The Iranian Question
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 29 Feb 08,, 10:08
  4. Arab volunteers killed in Iraq: an Analysis
    By Shek in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 24 Aug 05,, 12:29
  5. Quagmire or not?
    By Shek in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 72
    Last Post: 04 Jul 05,, 17:18

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •