Page 7 of 17 FirstFirst 12345678910111213141516 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 105 of 243

Thread: Iraq: The Wrong War

  1. #91
    Staff Emeritus
    Military Professional
    Shek's Avatar
    Join Date
    23 Feb 05
    Location
    Krblachistan
    Posts
    11,490
    Quote Originally Posted by Semper Fi
    It was not only Shia's who voted it was also Kurds and Sunni's. I doubt they would risk blowing themsleves up that day if their was a chance they might be blowing up members of their own tribes.

    And what part of Shia's being scared to be blown to bits by their dear friends the Sunni's in a large Shia gathering dont you understand?
    So you think that the Al Mahdi Army didn't bounce the event? Maybe they should have worn yellow shirts with "Event Security" written on them so that you would have seen them in the pictures of an event that had fewer folks than a high school football game in attendance, but made headlines as if the majority of Iraqi Shia had attended. That is, unless Al Mahdi was part of the 6,000 count, which means the protests drew even fewer outsiders.

    Next, AI, AS, and AQ are the groups that are carrying out the homicide car bomb attacks, the same groups that threatened homicide car bomb attacks on election day. They don't care about life. Also, it's kind of hard for foreign fighters to blow up members of their own tribe in Iraq, don't you think?

    If you want me to take out Sunnis and Kurds from my numbers, I'll do it. 0.038% of Shia attended the rallies to protest the American presence. That's less than 4 people out of every 10,000. To put it another way, 9,996 out of every 10,000 Shia didn't attend.

  2. #92
    Contributor
    Join Date
    23 Jul 04
    Posts
    355
    Quote Originally Posted by dalem
    Dodging the question. Do you support us invading Iran tomorrow?
    Why the hell would, I support invading Iran now when we pretty much have are hands full in Afghanistan and Iraq right now. Before Iraq yes.

    Quote Originally Posted by dalem
    No no, you are claiming they ARE terrorists, and you should prove it.
    Oh, I get it so people who burn the American flag and chant death to america are not terrorists. Well this is how, I can prove they are. Go to Pakistan where they have one of these protest and while their chanting death to america say out loud, I'm a american and when you end up like Daniel Pearl then we should know if your little theory about people chanting death to american and burning the american flag could not possibly terrorists, I mean how could they it's not like they hate us or anything and want us dead.


    Irrelevant. You claim that for every terrorist we kill we create another. I see that line spouted a lot. I am asking you to use your brain and present some proof for your claim.

    -dale[/QUOTE]

    How the hell is that irrevelant if, I said some of them who chant "Death to America" and burn the american flag with their children are not possibly going to be terrorists someday. So you are trying to tell me before someone becomes a terrorists they never go to protest and burn american flags?

    What they suddenly wake up one day and say today would be a good day to become a suicide bomber.

  3. #93
    Contributor
    Join Date
    23 Jul 04
    Posts
    355
    Quote Originally Posted by Bluesman
    What an incredibly poor analysis of the situation.

    Are you aware, junior, that Zarqawi just got approval to do that very thing - blow up ANYbody, that is - if the objective was to get the Yanks? Not that it stopped him for a second before he got said approval, but now he has something like religious top-cover for whatever bestiality he'd care to commit, as long as he can claim an infidel in the bodycount, or even if that's what they were after, but missed.

    As for understanding anything, are you really sure you want to compare intellectual dick size in this company, peewee?
    You just contradicted yourself with this quote you moron. "Zarqawi just got approval to do that very thing - blow up ANYbody, that is - if the objective was to get the Yanks?"

    How long ago did the elections take place?

  4. #94
    Lord High Hullabalooster Senior Contributor dalem's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Nov 04
    Location
    Columbia Heights, MN
    Posts
    12,978
    Semper Fi-

    Sadly, I hope that's a rubber Ka-bar that you're playing with there. Your efforts so far have shown no ability to reason yourself outside of the wet paper bag you have climbed into.

    I wish you luck in your life. You're gonna need some.

    -dale

  5. #95
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    23,992
    Quote Originally Posted by dalem
    I know what it was based on. I just think it's stupid to set any such thing in stone.

    -dale
    The official doctrine of the USArmy is still FM 3.0
    Chimo

  6. #96
    Staff Emeritus
    Military Professional
    Shek's Avatar
    Join Date
    23 Feb 05
    Location
    Krblachistan
    Posts
    11,490
    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers
    The official doctrine of the USArmy is still FM 3.0
    Sir, they are referring to strategic doctrine in the political arena and not operational doctrine in the military sense.

  7. #97
    Lord High Hullabalooster Senior Contributor dalem's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Nov 04
    Location
    Columbia Heights, MN
    Posts
    12,978
    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers
    The official doctrine of the USArmy is still FM 3.0
    K. But that's a lot more flexible than either the Dale Doctrine or the Powell Doctrine.

    -dale

  8. #98
    WAB Bartender Defense Professional
    Military Professional
    Bluesman's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Nov 04
    Location
    Nellis AFB, Las Vegas, NV
    Posts
    8,566
    Quote Originally Posted by dalem
    Semper Fi-

    Sadly, I hope that's a rubber Ka-bar that you're playing with there. Your efforts so far have shown no ability to reason yourself outside of the wet paper bag you have climbed into.

    I wish you luck in your life. You're gonna need some.

    -dale
    I was VERY unwise to re-engage this clown, dalem. Should've written him off that once and DONE. But no, I hadda give him an excuse to keep polluting the thread.

    Learned my lesson; he's joined the bodycount.
    "The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it, and if one finds the prospect of a long war intolerable, it is natural to disbelieve in the possibility of victory."
    - George Orwell

  9. #99
    Contributor
    Join Date
    23 Jul 04
    Posts
    355
    Quote Originally Posted by shek
    So you think that the Al Mahdi Army didn't bounce the event? Maybe they should have worn yellow shirts with "Event Security" written on them so that you would have seen them in the pictures of an event that had fewer folks than a high school football game in attendance, but made headlines as if the majority of Iraqi Shia had attended. That is, unless Al Mahdi was part of the 6,000 count, which means the protests drew even fewer outsiders.

    Wait are you trying to tell me suicide bombers would stop a attack just because the Al Mahdi Army was their? Their has been several attacks on Shiite areas, I'm pretty sure Al Mahdi Army was their and suicide bombers could care less.

    Quote Originally Posted by shek
    Next, AI, AS, and AQ are the groups that are carrying out the homicide car bomb attacks, the same groups that threatened homicide car bomb attacks on election day. They don't care about life. Also, it's kind of hard for foreign fighters to blow up members of their own tribe in Iraq, don't you think?
    Do have any proof that the suicide car bombers are only foreing fighters. I was not aware Iraqis were not capable of blowing themselves up.

    Quote Originally Posted by shek
    If you want me to take out Sunnis and Kurds from my numbers, I'll do it. 0.038% of Shia attended the rallies to protest the American presence. That's less than 4 people out of every 10,000. To put it another way, 9,996 out of every 10,000 Shia didn't attend.
    Like, I said at this point the Sunni and Shia are not in good relations. Why would several Shia make theirselves a huge target since they what could happen.

  10. #100
    Contributor
    Join Date
    23 Jul 04
    Posts
    355
    Quote Originally Posted by dalem
    Semper Fi-

    Sadly, I hope that's a rubber Ka-bar that you're playing with there. Your efforts so far have shown no ability to reason yourself outside of the wet paper bag you have climbed into.

    I wish you luck in your life. You're gonna need some.

    -dale
    Why because, I dont agree with you?

    I guess then several millions in the US are also going to need the same luck huh?

    I also wish you luck in life especially our armed forces all around the world. Dont worry about me though after, I finish my EMT course and apply to become a Paramedic, I will to busy to disagree with you here.

  11. #101
    Senior Contributor BenRoethig's Avatar
    Join Date
    03 Jan 04
    Location
    Dubuque, Iowa, United States
    Posts
    1,458
    You shouldn't need a reason to depose a genocidal maniac. Instead of the leftists asking how could we justify going in there, they should be asked how they just sat there and do nothing while inocents died.
    F/A-18E/F Super Hornet: The Honda Accord of fighters.

  12. #102
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    03 Aug 03
    Posts
    16,429
    "And M21Sniper if Osama Bin Laden was in the same room with me the only one who would have a smile on their face would be me..........after, I removed his head with my ka-bar."

    Then pull on some BDUs, rejoin your MEU, and lets make it friggin happen.

    All this dissention only serves to further embolden the enemy.

    Didn't you people learn anything from Vietnam?

    I mean, jesus christ already.

  13. #103
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    03 Aug 03
    Posts
    16,429
    "Have you heard of the Powell Doctrine? I believe General Powell, as Chairman of the JCS, qualified as a militarily knowledgable man. The fourth part of Powell's doctrine stated:

    “ . . . There must be a clear exit strategy from the conflict in which the military is engaged,” "

    There is, and it's an obvious one.

    In Iraq, it's the election of a permanent gov't. So far, so good on that front.

    In the overall WOT, it's victory.

    So far, so good on that front too.

  14. #104
    Canadian again at last! Military Professional
    Join Date
    17 May 05
    Location
    Yellowknife, NWT
    Posts
    1,407
    Quote Originally Posted by Semper Fi
    Wait are you trying to tell me suicide bombers would stop a attack just because the Al Mahdi Army was their? Their has been several attacks on Shiite areas, I'm pretty sure Al Mahdi Army was their and suicide bombers could care less.



    Do have any proof that the suicide car bombers are only foreing fighters. I was not aware Iraqis were not capable of blowing themselves up.



    Like, I said at this point the Sunni and Shia are not in good relations. Why would several Shia make theirselves a huge target since they what could happen.

    Semper Fi my freind you've been flayed enough for being an idiot but I'd like to add one on. It's hard to believe someone's argument when you don't grasp basic spelling. For example: Shia make "themselves" ... not theirselves.

    Furthermore, their implies ownership. There is the spelling used to imply location. Such as that man over "there" is an idiot.

  15. #105
    Canadian again at last! Military Professional
    Join Date
    17 May 05
    Location
    Yellowknife, NWT
    Posts
    1,407
    I've been cruising this site for a bit now reading what people have to say. I've come to this conclusion. Bluesman, I love you

    What I have a hard time understanding is why people assume that they will ever know the whole picture as a civilian. The whole point of making something classified is so that everyone doesn't know the classified information. I mean why let the enemy know that you know everything they've done? I'd rather the bastard be surprised when I kick in his front door to get him and drag his ass away rather than be armed and ready. Most likely however, he just won't be there.

    Semper Fi: note the correct use of "there" as used in a sentence

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Why We Are in Iraq
    By Leader in forum Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation New Dawn
    Replies: 139
    Last Post: 07 Nov 10,, 15:46
  2. Iran president wants Israel "wiped off the map"
    By ZFBoxcar in forum The Iranian Question
    Replies: 170
    Last Post: 26 Sep 09,, 00:35
  3. Rethinking Iraq: The Way Forward
    By astralis in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 30 Oct 06,, 17:51
  4. So who moved the WMD? Someone did...
    By Bill in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 16 Mar 06,, 15:54
  5. Why the U.S. must withdraw from Iraq
    By lulldapull in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 56
    Last Post: 04 Jan 05,, 18:20

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •