I'm just about to the point of believing that the goal of political reconciliation is a farce, regardless of the outcome on the de-baath and oil revenue legislation. It's too intractable. We need other alternatives but I fear this administration is unwilling to consider the wider implications and choices.
Said it before. Now I'm adamant. Surrender the south, understanding that it lays the groundwork for a de facto partition. Understand, therefore, that we must determine that which we WON'T surrender, acting accordingly. Oh, and unabashedly.
O'Hanlon & Pollack Comment-NYT
This article is being offered elsewhere here as evidence that conditions are improving. Still, O'Hanlon and Pollack also said this-
"How much longer should American troops keep fighting and dying to build a new Iraq while Iraqi leaders fail to do their part? And how much longer can we wear down our forces in this mission? These haunting questions underscore the reality that the surge cannot go on forever. But there is enough good happening on the battlefields of Iraq today that Congress should plan on sustaining the effort at least into 2008."
LOL!!! Has anybody suggested that we'll be gone before January 1, 2008?
Looking forward to exercising my god-given right to pursue some "political expediency".![]()



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

Share this thread with friends: