Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Lebanon admits it okayed arms transfer to Hezbollah

  1. #1
    A Self Important Senior Contributor troung's Avatar
    Join Date
    03 Aug 03
    Posts
    6,788

    Lebanon admits it okayed arms transfer to Hezbollah

    Lebanon admits it okayed arms transfer to Hezbollah


    The Lebanese government publicly admitted recently, for the first time, that it had permitted the delivery of a convoy of arms from Syria to Hezbollah. The United Nations responded by issuing a condemnation.

    According to Lebanese sources, Lebanese soldiers halted a convoy of arms-laden trucks from Syria at an army checkpoint in the Lebanon Valley on January 31. However, the Lebanese Defense Ministry ordered the soldiers to allow the convoy to proceed.

    A report on this incident then reached the UN's special envoy to the Middle East, Terje Larsen, in New York, and Larsen instructed his staff to investigate. Eventually, the Lebanese government admitted both that it had allowed the convoy to pass, and that the arms had been destined for Hezbollah.

    The UN then published a statement condemning the Lebanese government for having blatantly violated UN Security Council Resolution 1559, which, inter alia, calls for disarming the country's militias.

    The arms in the convoy originated apparently from Iran. It is not known how many trucks were in the convoy or what arms they carried.

    Arms smuggling from Syria into Lebanon has been going on for years, seemingly with the knowledge of the Lebanese government. In this fashion, huge quantities of arms from Iran and Syria have reached Hezbollah in recent years, including massive quantities of Katyushas and other rockets that are stationed in batteries in southern Lebanon and are aimed at Israel.

    However, this is the first time that the Lebanese have publicly admitted the existence of these convoys, much less that it has been authorizing arms deliveries to Hezbollah. The convoy's passage was apparently approved by the office of Defense Minister Elias Murr, in coordination with the office of Lebanon's pro-Syrian president, Emile Lahoud.

    According to a statement published by the UN on February 13, the UN forces in Lebanon were initially unaware of the convoy's passage, though reports of the incident reached them later. When the news reached Larsen, he demanded clarifications from Beirut, adding that if the reports were true, the action constituted a gross violation of Resolution 1559. Larsen's office is responsible, inter alia, for overseeing implemention of this resolution, which was passed in September 2004.

    In response, Prime Minister Fuad Siniora's office confirmed the convoy's arrival, but did not specify for whom the arms were destined.

    At the same time, the UN contacted the Lebanese Defense Ministry, which informed it that the arms were destined for Hezbollah. The ministry added that the army permitted the transfer of weapons to the "resistance" forces - i.e. Hezbollah - in accordance with a decision made by the Lebanese government.

    Following receipt of this information, the UN published a second statement, in which it condemned the incident as a grave violation of Resolution 1559, expressed concern and demanded that Beirut take steps to prevent a repetition.

    Hezbollah claims that it is not a "militia," and therefore, the resolution's demand that all Lebanese militias be disarmed does not apply to the organization. This interpretation has also been adopted by the Syrian government, Lahoud and several Lebanese cabinet ministers. As a result, Hezbollah has enjoyed preferential treatment compared to other Lebanese militias.

    In contrast, the Lebanese army has at times confiscated arms shipments to Palestinian organizations based in Lebanon. In December 2005, for instance, after a Palestinian group with ties to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's organization, Al-Qaida in Iraq, fired Katyushas at Israel, Lebanon arrested some members of the group and confiscated their weapons




    http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/687109.html

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    26 Feb 06
    Posts
    19
    Go Lebanon!!!

    Howcome Hezbollah are labelled as terrorists? Because they are the only ones who fought Israeli occupation of their land? RIDICULOUS.

  3. #3
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    03 Aug 03
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    2,042
    This may shock you but there is no Israeli occupation of Lebanon.

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    26 Feb 06
    Posts
    19
    There was up until a few years ago... do you remember, or just a little wet behind the ears? Hezbollah was the only military organisation resisting that occupation and hence the Israelis conveniently labelled them as terrorists.

  5. #5
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    03 Aug 03
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    2,042
    So why does Hezbollah still exist? Oh yeah, they served as cronies to the Syrian occupiers of Lebanon. Or did you forget the Syrian occupation of Lebanon that JUST ENDED? You must be REALLY wet behind the ears.

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    26 Feb 06
    Posts
    19
    No, they are not cronies of Syria, they have a substantial popular mandate within Lebanon, they are allies to Syria. And if it was not for Syria's intervention, the country would still be in civil war. Their continued presence in Lebanon was comparible to the current US presence in the Persian Gulf Arab states.

    Hezbollah should not disband otherwise they open an invitation for further Israeli impertinence in their country.

  7. #7
    Defense Professional Dreadnought's Avatar
    Join Date
    12 May 05
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA.
    Posts
    13,648

    Post

    Hezbolla,
    Until they cease hostilities and fully pursue the political process peacfully will continue to be considered nothing short of terrorists. Nothing more nothing less.

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    02 May 04
    Posts
    622
    Hizbollah arming themselves again? Are we going to be witnessing another civil war in Lebanon again?

    Looks like the Lebanese feel didn't kill enough of each other in the last civil war, and hizbollah are pumping themselves up for round two.

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    26 Feb 06
    Posts
    19
    As far as I know they never did disarm. And I think tehy are strong enough to pacify any other militant group in Lebanon should things start to deteriorate again.

  10. #10
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    03 Aug 03
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    2,042
    How about having the army of the somewhat elected government keep the peace, instead of a group which has been trying to provoke a war with Israel for several years (they have launched tons of attacks on Israel since Israel withdrew from Lebanon).

  11. #11
    New Member
    Join Date
    14 Apr 06
    Posts
    4

    Okay...allow me to bring your attention to a couple of things...

    Graydonkey, I don't know where you get your political analysis from, and quite frankly, I don't care. But Syria occupied Lebanon from 1976 till 2005, and it still has some say in Lebanese politics. Mind you, the war ended in 1989. Damn long time, don't you think?

    Furthermore, they are NOT the only ones who funded Hizbullah with financial and military aid; Iran did that too. Besides, Hizbullah is a religious party, not a nationalist party; a real nationalist party should be secular. And FYI, Lebanon is still technically at war with Israel, and though the majority of them withdrew in 2000, there are still some in the Shebaa region. Though I have nothing against you, Graydonkey, please do some more research before openly declaring a political opinion.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Syria still arming Hezbollah
    By Ray in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02 Nov 06,, 06:17
  2. Israel won't expand offensive in Lebanon
    By troung in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 12 Sep 06,, 04:07
  3. Lebanon's Politics Gives Hezbollah Power
    By Ray in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03 Sep 06,, 11:49
  4. Who won it?
    By Khan Sahab in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 81
    Last Post: 26 Aug 06,, 19:39
  5. Arabs Press Syria to End Hezbollah Support
    By troung in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 24 Jul 06,, 03:42

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •