ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > General Forums > Member Introductions
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-11-2006, 22:40 PM   #1 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,663
Country:
Military Professionals Program

Dear Members,

We have recently launched the Military Professionals program. The program is for officers, non-commissioned officers, warrant officers, and certain specialists who have served, or are currently serving in a branch of one of the armed forces of the world in a professional capacity.

Members of the Military Professionals program will have the same benefits given to senior members (750 posts), a blue user title, and a 'Military Professional' user rank.

The purpose of the Military Professionals program is to confer that these members have authoritative knowledge of military matters regarding their military specialty given their years of experience in the military, and, at minimum, a good knowledge of military affairs in general.

If I have overlooked you, or you know of any current members that I have overlooked, please contact Ironduke, Tophatter, or Officer of Engineers at your earliest convenience so that we can get you or them added to the list. Please be prepared to provide information on rank, unit(s), and a brief history of service, and please do not provide any information that is regarded as overly sensitive or classified.

Any additional information is welcome and will help expedite your admission. Information may be shared with a select few senior military professionals on the forum to help verify your inclusion in the group.

We eventually plan on expanding the scope of the program in the near future, the details of which will be worked out in time.

Military Cadets: We have a 'Military Cadets' usergroup, the details of which will be announced shortly. In the meantime, send me a private message if you are interested for inclusion in that usergroup.

Note: If you know a long-time senior military member here, and you have military service qualifying you for entry but do not wish to discuss the details, their recommendation will be accepted.

Regards, Ironduke
Ironduke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2006, 23:16 PM   #2 (permalink)
Shek
Moderator
 
Join Date: 02-23-05
Location: Krblachistan
Posts: 7,253
Country:
Ironduke,
I'd like to thank you, the staff, and all the posters at WAB for the hospitality that you've all shown us military folk, especially to a dumb infantryman like myself.
__________________
"So little pains do the vulgar take in the investigation of truth, accepting readily the first story that comes to hand." Thucydides 1.20.3
Shek is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2006, 23:25 PM   #3 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 14,876
Country:
I 2nd that thanks, especially allowing me in here after I dug the backyard latrine.
__________________
Chimo
Officer of Engineers is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2006, 06:20 AM   #4 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,663
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
I 2nd that thanks, especially allowing me in here after I dug the backyard latrine.
Heh, not quite sure what you are referring to

On another note, I don't think its you who should be thanking us, it's us who should be thanking the military professionals here at WAB.
Ironduke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2006, 08:18 AM   #5 (permalink)
-{SpoonmaN}-
Death, the Destroyer of Worlds...
Senior Contributor
 
-{SpoonmaN}-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-08-04
Location: The badlands of West London.
Posts: 1,455
Country:
Do Officers in training count? Just wondering if I should let you know when I start, or should I wait to see if I make it to comission first?
__________________
"I have this to say to the people of Australia: Kick me, I'm different."
-{SpoonmaN}- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2006, 09:38 AM   #6 (permalink)
glyn
Military Professional
 
glyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-15-06
Location: Penzance, Cornwall UK
Posts: 5,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by -{SpoonmaN}- View Post
Do Officers in training count? Just wondering if I should let you know when I start, or should I wait to see if I make it to comission first?
First you have to learn to be a soldier, then you have to become ever more professional, and finally your rank will match your ability. In many ways I think the whole commissioning story needs re-jigging and if necessary starting all over with a clean sheet of paper. I see nothing wrong with everybody coming in with the rank of private soldier, with promotion wholly dependant on the individuals ability. The career officers structure would obviously also need to be reformed, along with much of what is presently taught at staff college.
__________________
Semper in excretum. Solum profunda variat.
glyn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2006, 09:42 AM   #7 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 14,876
Country:
It's the other way around, Glyn, sh!t floats.
Officer of Engineers is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2006, 12:17 PM   #8 (permalink)
glyn
Military Professional
 
glyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-15-06
Location: Penzance, Cornwall UK
Posts: 5,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
It's the other way around, Glyn, sh!t floats.
Whilst I can't deny that, it must also be observed that cream floats to the top of the pitcher as well!
The point I tried to make (and obviously failed to do so) is that we are persevering in using old methods for officer selection in the armed forces. What may have been appropriate hundreds of years ago may not be as suitable for today. Obviously qualified doctors, engineers, teachers and the like should be commisioned on joining, but those entering the 'sabre' arms could progress through all the ranks on merit. Technically thats the case now but I know, as I'm sure you do also, that a number of superb soldiers never get the chance even to be considered. To my mind this is a dreadful waste of talent. High qualifications are not the full story, gumption and grit are what's required. I had a driver for 2 years whose qualifications ( BA, BSc,MIT) were better than the 2 specialist engineering officers we had! He was a delightful chap to know but he refused every opportunity to go to RCB as he simply wasn't motivated to make the Army a career. Soldiering is unlike any other profession. We have to make sure the opportunities are there for the 'right stuff' to get on.
glyn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2006, 12:58 PM   #9 (permalink)
Shek
Moderator
 
Join Date: 02-23-05
Location: Krblachistan
Posts: 7,253
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by glyn View Post
Whilst I can't deny that, it must also be observed that cream floats to the top of the pitcher as well!
The point I tried to make (and obviously failed to do so) is that we are persevering in using old methods for officer selection in the armed forces. What may have been appropriate hundreds of years ago may not be as suitable for today. Obviously qualified doctors, engineers, teachers and the like should be commisioned on joining, but those entering the 'sabre' arms could progress through all the ranks on merit. Technically thats the case now but I know, as I'm sure you do also, that a number of superb soldiers never get the chance even to be considered. To my mind this is a dreadful waste of talent. High qualifications are not the full story, gumption and grit are what's required. I had a driver for 2 years whose qualifications ( BA, BSc,MIT) were better than the 2 specialist engineering officers we had! He was a delightful chap to know but he refused every opportunity to go to RCB as he simply wasn't motivated to make the Army a career. Soldiering is unlike any other profession. We have to make sure the opportunities are there for the 'right stuff' to get on.
Glyn,

I'll have to disagree here, at least within the American military. My observation has been that while those who have served before as enlisted have made some of the best officers, those plucked from the ranks have alos made by far the worst officers (they were either stuck in their ways or else couldn't make the break from being enlisted and were too buddy buddy with the soldiers in their units, to the detriment of the unit). On the contrary, those from the non-OCS commissioning sources were on average pretty good to great, with only a few outliers.

Second, as an army with a tradition of being big on maneuver and firepower, we often promote folks beyond their strategic capabilities - you are advanced based on your tactical prowess in tactical units. However, at some point, you decisions are strategic, and not tactical. Yet, many don't have the necessary strategic foundation to make strategic decisions. Thus, you end up with a General Franks that wants to talk about taking out a bunker in Afghanistan instead of grand strategy when addressing an audience that is at the operational or strategic levels of their careers. By requiring prior service as an enlistee, you'll cut down on the advanced education opportunities for officers, as most will need to complete their undergraduate studies, and timelines won't allow for as many graduate school opportunities as exists now. If you look at the US Army, it's been those with advanced graduate experience that have excelled: Petraeus, Chiarelli, McMaster, etc.

So, from this side of the pond, I would heartily disagree with the prior service requirement (you can look at Israel as an example - officers with great tactical and operational experience, but not so keen on some strategic areas, resulting in some less than optimal performance during its occupational duties in the territories).
Shek is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2006, 15:17 PM   #10 (permalink)
glyn
Military Professional
 
glyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-15-06
Location: Penzance, Cornwall UK
Posts: 5,875
Shek, if it's any consolation I can pick holes in my own suggestion too! It's just that I feel there must be a better system than the one we now have. You and I can swap stories about good or bad officers that came through the ranks / were direct entry. In the British Army we actually had one man who went from 12 year old bugle boy to Chief of the Imperial General Staff (Lord Roberts, known as 'Bobs') and that was in Victorian times when we were supposed to have been class-ridden. Generations of soldiers were told by recruiting sergeants that there was a Field Marshalls baton at the bottom of every knapsack! Yes, there would have to be many changes to the system to get it to work, and there are few institutions more conservative in outlook, and resistant to change than the military. I expect many more brickbats to come my way!
glyn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2006, 16:23 PM   #11 (permalink)
Shek
Moderator
 
Join Date: 02-23-05
Location: Krblachistan
Posts: 7,253
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by glyn View Post
Shek, if it's any consolation I can pick holes in my own suggestion too! It's just that I feel there must be a better system than the one we now have. You and I can swap stories about good or bad officers that came through the ranks / were direct entry. In the British Army we actually had one man who went from 12 year old bugle boy to Chief of the Imperial General Staff (Lord Roberts, known as 'Bobs') and that was in Victorian times when we were supposed to have been class-ridden. Generations of soldiers were told by recruiting sergeants that there was a Field Marshalls baton at the bottom of every knapsack! Yes, there would have to be many changes to the system to get it to work, and there are few institutions more conservative in outlook, and resistant to change than the military. I expect many more brickbats to come my way!
Glyn,

I agree that we could do a better job at tweaking our commissioning sources, but the dichotomy of the performance of officers with prior service that I've seen in the US Army was so strong, that it amazed me - you were either great or sucked, no in between. An inverse bell curve to the extreme.

I think that a blended system is best: some prior service and some wet behind the ears from ROTC and USMA each brings their own unique strengths. It be interesting to introduce a Sandhurst commissioning source here in the US and see how that changes the dynamics. In any event, I'd hate to see a movement towards homogenizing the commissioning experience by having only a single source to where you create more groupthink in an environment that already attracts a relatively homogenous group.
Shek is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2006, 17:54 PM   #12 (permalink)
glyn
Military Professional
 
glyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-15-06
Location: Penzance, Cornwall UK
Posts: 5,875
The Danes when they had conscription took everybody in and through recruit training. After that the top 10% went to NCOs school whilst everyone else did their trade training. The top 10% after completion of the NCOs course went to Officer training school, and the other NCOs were sent to their units.Officer school took the candidates and trained them, sending them to their units for a few months before their conscription time was up. Some soldiers, NCOs and officers would elect to become regulars. Promotion from then on depended on ability and experience. It seemed to me to be a good system and I thought the Danish army to be quite professional in outlook and accomplished in the field. I did some exercises with them in Jutland in the 1960s.
glyn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2006, 07:44 AM   #13 (permalink)
Draconion
Contributor
 
Draconion's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-14-06
Location: Pune, India
Posts: 614
Country:
Ok..I may be far from qualified to talk about the army, be it Indian or otherwise.

But I think the ACR system of the army needs an overhaul. It is realy nice and really bad too.

Sycophants reach the top these days and many good officers dont.

Not that I know much of the army, but my Dad got superseeded just because on many occasions he stood his ground on issues in which he disagreed with the CO. There were others who just were the yes sir,yes sir three backs full sir types and they are presently Colonels.
__________________
"To every man upon this earth, Death cometh soon or late;
And how can a man die better; Than facing fearful odds,
For the ashes of his father; And the temples of his gods."
Draconion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2006, 15:56 PM   #14 (permalink)
Rifleman
Military Professional
 
Rifleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-29-06
Location: The edge of the gene pool with a jug of Clorox
Posts: 199
It's an honor to be included, since I was a fire team leader extraordinaire, even if I do say so myself .

In seriousness and fairness to someone who might tend to give something I say extra credence because of this designation, I remind everyone that I was a paratrooper/light infantryman for four years. Sure, I know what I know, but what I know isn't that broad or well rounded if you think in terms of "military matters."

I do appreciate the blue though. Infantry colors!
__________________
"Aim small, miss small." - Benjamin Martin in The Patriot
Rifleman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2006, 16:57 PM   #15 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 14,876
Country:
Don't sell yourself short. You know what doesn't work. That is as important as knowing what does.
Officer of Engineers is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Iraq in Books - Review Essay Shek The War in Iraq 9 02-29-2008 06:08 AM
Guerilla Warfare troung The Staff College 13 04-05-2006 02:25 AM
Mullah's leading the charge... troung The Field Mess 11 03-28-2006 10:59 AM
Bangladesh plays the China card Ray South Asian Defense Topics 136 10-17-2005 10:14 AM
Pentagon under fire for waste of military supplies troung The Western Alliance 7 06-09-2005 12:40 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:02 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8