Defense, Miitary, and Geopolitical Forum
                                                     The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | WAB Bookstore


LOGIN or REGISTER to REMOVE ADS

Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Discussion > Land Forces



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-25-2005, 00:12 AM   #1 (permalink)
Patron
 
Join Date: 04-15-05
Posts: 195
Air Defense System - Patriot Missile vs S300

I've read from a Chinese magazine that the Russian S300 systems are "more advanced" than American Patriot system, is that true?

Discuss.

Sorry if somebody else already post similar topic(s).
Enzo Ferrari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2005, 00:16 AM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 09-29-04
Posts: 789
Great thread. I'm interested. I'm favoring the S-300 or newer versions such as 450. I have finals tommorow but if someone can start posting it would be great.
Franco Lolan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2005, 00:40 AM   #3 (permalink)
Patron
 
Join Date: 04-15-05
Posts: 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franco Lolan
Great thread. I'm interested. I'm favoring the S-300 or newer versions such as 450. I have finals tommorow but if someone can start posting it would be great.
American one is the first and only tactical missile "kills" air defense system (despite the low killing rate), and judge from the traditions of the exaggeration from Russian weapon brochures......

http://www.ima.umn.edu/~arnold/disasters/patriot.html
Enzo Ferrari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2005, 05:05 AM   #4 (permalink)
Banished
 
Join Date: 05-07-04
Posts: 93
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enzo Ferrari
I've read from a Chinese magazine that the Russian S300 systems are "more advanced" than American Patriot system, is that true?

Discuss.

Sorry if somebody else already post similar topic(s).
amercans r more advanced in electronic warfare systems but russians r always superior in rocketry systems. true...s-300 is anytime superior to patriots.we saw in gulf war how accurate pac system was.
vishv29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2005, 09:44 AM   #5 (permalink)
Military Professional
 
Sandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-05-05
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 218
Country:
Numbers on the Russian missile are advertised as the best over the Patriot. How does the range/speed of the PAC-2 compare to the S-400?
Sandman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2005, 05:04 AM   #6 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
The PAC-2 system hit everything it was fired at during ODS.

Including our own planes.

S-400: Mach 6.2, range believed to be at least 200 miles
PAC-2: Mach 5+, range approx 90 miles
USN SM-3: Mach 8+, range approx 160 nautical miles
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2005, 05:06 AM   #7 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
"amercans r more advanced in electronic warfare systems but russians r always superior in rocketry systems."

What russian AAM has the speed or range of the 20+ yo Phoenix AAM?

Answer: None

What Russian SAM has the speed of the SM-3?

Answer: None.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2005, 08:12 AM   #8 (permalink)
Real Madrid CF
Senior Contributor
 
indianguy4u's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-07-05
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 3,213
Country:
What about Israeli Arrows?
__________________
Hala Madrid!!
indianguy4u is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2005, 08:44 AM   #9 (permalink)
Contributor
 
hello's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-31-05
Posts: 697
Quote:
Originally Posted by M21Sniper
"amercans r more advanced in electronic warfare systems but russians r always superior in rocketry systems."

What russian AAM has the speed or range of the 20+ yo Phoenix AAM?

Answer: None

What Russian SAM has the speed of the SM-3?

Answer: None.
The phoenix has actually never killed directly. It's only "kill" was when its speed made the target Mig25's pilot force it over the top and had to eventually ditch it.
hello is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2005, 01:23 AM   #10 (permalink)
Regular
 
Join Date: 07-15-05
Posts: 41
Yes S-300 PMU2 favorit is better than any American air defense system. S-400 Triumf is a beast with no one even close to it. Air Defense is one field where Russians really have an edge over Americans.
Child of War is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2005, 01:30 AM   #11 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
"The phoenix has actually never killed directly. It's only "kill" was when its speed made the target Mig25's pilot force it over the top and had to eventually ditch it."

Not true.

The Iranians shot down numerous aircraft during the Iran Iraq war with AIM-54s. It was well into the twenties.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2005, 11:08 AM   #12 (permalink)
Jay
Tamizhanban
Senior Contributor
 
Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,820
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by M21Sniper
The PAC-2 system hit everything it was fired at during ODS.
Including our own planes.
They didnt have IFF like stuff in them missiles, yet?? I guess all the missiles/smar bombs/Cruise missiles have to be equipped with some sort of IFF to reduce friendly fires.
__________________
A grain of wheat eclipsed the sun of Adam !!
Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2005, 02:18 AM   #13 (permalink)
Military Professional
 
Sandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-05-05
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 218
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by M21Sniper
The PAC-2 system hit everything it was fired at during ODS.

Including our own planes.

S-400: Mach 6.2, range believed to be at least 200 miles
PAC-2: Mach 5+, range approx 90 miles
USN SM-3: Mach 8+, range approx 160 nautical miles
This is what I was thinking from the info on the PAC-1 info published, and the fact that the Patriot was to ultimately replace the capability of Nike Herculese as a high altitude long range SAM. Another interesting question is if the US has plans, particularly after the announced withdrawal from the ABM treaty, to be able to data link the Patriots and Thaads and AEGIS cruisers and their SM-3s to a "battle management" and "break out" an ABM defense of the US in case things ever got ugly with Russia or China (more likely China and a crisis with Taiwan).
At one time in the 1960s we had close to 10,000 Nike Herculese SAMS many with nuclear warheads around our cities and major bases. Ed Thaelen(http://ed-thelen.org/) has a website talking about his service with the "circles of supersonic steal". Could we re-erect a SAM/ABM defense of our country quickly?

Last edited by Sandman; 07-17-2005 at 02:29 AM..
Sandman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2005, 02:50 AM   #14 (permalink)
HKHolic
Senior Contributor
 
leib10's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-17-05
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 3,389
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by M21Sniper
"The phoenix has actually never killed directly. It's only "kill" was when its speed made the target Mig25's pilot force it over the top and had to eventually ditch it."

Not true.

The Iranians shot down numerous aircraft during the Iran Iraq war with AIM-54s. It was well into the twenties.
So what's the beef about the Phoenix being a worthless, expensive and cumbersome POS? A theory for the lack of Phoenix kills in ODS was because Iraqi MiG pilots would recognize the powerful AWG-9 emissions and try to get away from it and bump into other coalition aircraft while attempting to escape.

As for Russian weapons, the experimental or lesser-known ones always have inflated capabilities.
__________________
"The right man in the wrong place can make all the difference in the world. So wake up, Mr. Freeman. Wake up and smell the ashes." G-Man

Last edited by leib10; 07-17-2005 at 02:54 AM..
leib10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2005, 11:01 AM   #15 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
The F-14 earned a reputation as 'mig repellant' during ODS because as soon as the Iraqis detected emmisions from the AWG-9/APG-71 radar they'd turn tail and run like hell.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share this thread with friends:



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PLAN Analysis rickusn Naval Forces 9 06-12-2006 15:05 PM
Success Rate of SAMs The_Burning_Kid Military Aviation 81 05-22-2006 17:27 PM
JSF vs Rafale vs EF-2000 indianguy4u Military Aviation 7 08-29-2005 04:33 AM

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:23 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting and a specialist in joomla hosting services.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.