![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Patron
|
T-90 vs Type 99
Okay so I got fed up with people, mostly Chinese comparing a Type 99 tank with Abarms when they aren't even in the same weight class.
So I pick the T-90. It has a gun launched missile system and Kontact ERA. But I hear some unbelievable things about the Dazzeler system on the Chinese tank. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Contributor
|
real close battle, but, in regards of protection, i'd have to give it to the T-90, it has both ERA, and is protected by layers of ceramics, plastics, and metals in a Chobham styled armour
the thing i hate about the T-90 is its diesel engine, which is clearly inferior to a gas-turbine engine
__________________
for MOTHER MOLDOVA |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Contributor
|
Quote:
some say it is a light amphibious tank lightly armed ( this is wrong due to this type 63 A http://www.strategypage.com/gallery/..._200491103.asp others that it is a full Main Battle tank with ERA kits and Sudo Chobum and electronics near the level of a M1 ( in other words Dima your T90 is more likely to find it's self matched ) http://www.sinodefence.com/army/tank/type98.asp http://www.china-defense.com/armor/t...ype98-2_3.html
__________________
"Finger never touches Trigger unless some one is going too need a grave digger" (Me)[ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Contributor
|
well, the Type 99 is the Type 98G
what form of ERA does the Type 98G have? well, according to your links, the Type 98 is the last derivative of the Type 90 series, which was mean to counter the simple T-72 series of tanks, which shouldn't even be classified as MBT's, more like MPT's anyways http://sinodefence.com/army/tank/type90.asp if you look at the 3 paragraph, it mentions that the design was largely based on the T-80U when Russia showed China the tnak in 1995, the T-80U is clearly inferior to the T-90, and even the T-80UM1 is inferior to the T-90 "To accommodate more equipment and rounds, the Type 98's turret is slightly larger than that of the Type 90, which has resulted in a gap between turret and the hull in the front. This could be a major disadvantage in the battle as the whole turret might be blown off if the gap is hit." from the link you provided, could possibly be a major design flaw, and opponent nations will defeinitely take advantage of this also, since the gun is a Chinese domestic gun, it will be less advanced than the 2A46M-4, the most advanced Russian gun the T-90 has two more smoke discharging grenades than the Type 90 the only thing that i'd have to give the Type 98 is its much better engine, i think Russia made a mistake in choosing a diesel engine for the T-90, and i think that that is its only flaw, and it is quite major, for the T-90 only has a hp/ton ratio of about 18.26 while that for the Type 98 is 23.08 providing better mobility for the tank, but then again, because the Russian tank weighs more and is slightly smaller, it can be more accessible, can pass across bridges that may not be able to support more than 50 tons of weight the T-90's chobham styled armour(i have the specifications now) is made of multiple layers of each of these materials, plastics, kevlar, aluminum and titanium agreed sniper, but we cannot be that subjective to something such as this, take into account everythng, the whole point of a forum is to learn and discuss |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Contributor
|
oh, Terran, just a correction, the Type 98G/99 has a 1,500 horsepower engine, not 1,200 as your link stated
http://kampfpanzer.de/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Patron
|
the russian t-90 has been developed from the t-72bm. originally it's designation has been t-72bu, but it was changed to t-90. it includes t-80u technology (especially the fire control complex), but it has never been a t-80 version. and all t-72 versions have diesel engines (except prototypes)
the t-84 on the other hand is a t-80 version. to be ,ore precise it comes from the t-80ud which has been always diesel engine powered. regards axl www.kampfpanzer.de |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Contributor
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Thats me with my precious
Senior Contributor
|
That's a little go-kart engine compared to this baby:
http://www.marshallputnamfair.org/images/tp-eng.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Banished
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| World Navies Listing (updated 3/29/05) | rickusn | Naval Forces | 10 | 04-26-2005 14:08 PM |
| World Navies(Completed) | rickusn | Naval Forces | 17 | 04-03-2005 01:27 AM |
| World Navies | rickusn | Naval Forces | 0 | 03-31-2005 18:57 PM |
| World Navies Edited and Updated | rickusn | Naval Forces | 6 | 03-25-2005 22:02 PM |
| Greatly Revised Rankings | rickusn | Naval Forces | 2 | 03-20-2005 06:51 AM |