ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Land Forces
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-23-2003, 02:19 AM   #1 (permalink)
bigross86
401 Ikvot Habarzel
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 08-07-03
Location: Ra'anana, Israel
Posts: 3,148
Send a message via ICQ to bigross86 Send a message via AIM to bigross86 Send a message via Yahoo to bigross86
M1A2 VS Merkava Siman Arba (Merkava Mk IV)

Being that we're comparing other tanks can anyone post figures and data as to the performances of these two tanks?
__________________
You're a naughty girl, go to my room!
bigross86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2003, 14:23 PM   #2 (permalink)
Lunatock
Staff Emeritus
 
Lunatock's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Location: Southeast Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,497
Country:
Send a message via AIM to Lunatock Send a message via Yahoo to Lunatock
Off the top of my head. Abrams would have a hell of a time trying to slug it out with Merkavas in Israel Cities. Those streets are awfully narrow.

Think Kelly's Heroes, when the Sherman was behind the Tiger Tank.
Lunatock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2003, 14:28 PM   #3 (permalink)
TopHatter
Administrator
 
TopHatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-03-03
Location: Fort Myers FL
Posts: 9,693
Country:
Send a message via AIM to TopHatter
One thing I love about the Merkava is that compartment in the rear of the tank. Dead useful for all sorts of mischief, especially in MOUT ops.
__________________
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.
~John Quincy Adams
TopHatter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2003, 14:56 PM   #4 (permalink)
bigross86
401 Ikvot Habarzel
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 08-07-03
Location: Ra'anana, Israel
Posts: 3,148
Send a message via ICQ to bigross86 Send a message via AIM to bigross86 Send a message via Yahoo to bigross86
'Tock, what about out in the open? I heard the the Merkava Mk IV even has an air conditioner so the troops dont get exhausted and tried out from the heat of a steel coffin on wheels (as Snipe so lovingly calls them...)
bigross86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2003, 16:33 PM   #5 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
Most modern western tanks have air conditioning(it's part of the NBC system).

The infantry compartment in the Merkava is it's greatest asset, to me at least.

Good tank, but i don't know that it's protected to the level the M-1A2SEP, Challenger II and Leopard 2 are.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2003, 18:37 PM   #6 (permalink)
Praxus
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-26-03
Posts: 3,237
I think on the top armour it is more protected then the Abrams, but elsewhere there is less then Abrams, I may be wrong through.
Praxus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2003, 09:15 AM   #7 (permalink)
TopHatter
Administrator
 
TopHatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-03-03
Location: Fort Myers FL
Posts: 9,693
Country:
Send a message via AIM to TopHatter
From what I understand, the design of the Merkava had 1 overriding priority: the safety of the crew. Everything was designed to protect Israel's most precious commodity: Her soldiers.
TopHatter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2003, 09:57 AM   #8 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 15,915
Country:
Except that they went the wrong way.

They didn't bother to look up WWII answers which was to get out of the friggin tank. The Middle East should not be the examples for MOUT. Grozny should be the modern example where mines, booby traps, and elvated heavy ATGMs dominated the battlefield.
__________________
Chimo
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2003, 10:03 AM   #9 (permalink)
bigross86
401 Ikvot Habarzel
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 08-07-03
Location: Ra'anana, Israel
Posts: 3,148
Send a message via ICQ to bigross86 Send a message via AIM to bigross86 Send a message via Yahoo to bigross86
It seems that most battles will be fought out in the open, not in cities. The Negev, Golan, and Judea/Samaria are probably going to be the battlefields. The Arabs don't wanna get bogged down in urban warfare.
bigross86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2003, 12:45 PM   #10 (permalink)
TopHatter
Administrator
 
TopHatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-03-03
Location: Fort Myers FL
Posts: 9,693
Country:
Send a message via AIM to TopHatter
I would submit that MOUT warfare is ONLY place the Arabs can succeed. After all, there is enough destroyed Arab equipment littering the Middle East to show that conventional warfare is a bad idea when taking on Israelis or the Western Allies.
TopHatter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2003, 13:00 PM   #11 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 15,915
Country:
And you would be wrong.

The cities in the Middle East ain't built to the same standards as the West, mainly due to the lack of an ice belt. Houses and buildings ain't built to keep out cold and hence, a natural barrier for alot of fragmentation and bullets.

Plus, no large sewer system that has to be big enough and deep enough to avoid freezing in the winter. Such systems are also natural secured LOCs against bombing and even some bunkers at juncture points.

Their buildings would collapse with much more ease and therefore would not serve as ideal bunkers unlike those of Stalingrad or Berlin.
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2003, 13:10 PM   #12 (permalink)
TopHatter
Administrator
 
TopHatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-03-03
Location: Fort Myers FL
Posts: 9,693
Country:
Send a message via AIM to TopHatter
Perhaps I should clarify my opinion.
In a comparison between city-fighting and open area warfare, the Arab will have a great advantage. It may not be enough of one to win, but he certainly has a great advantage in the city then conventional warfare. As you pointed out, he won't enjoy the same advantages as the Russian in Stalingrad for example, but he still stands a better chance in the city.
TopHatter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2003, 14:56 PM   #13 (permalink)
axl
Patron
 
Join Date: 09-18-03
Posts: 242
Quote:
Originally posted by M21Sniper
Most modern western tanks have air conditioning(it's part of the NBC system).

The infantry compartment in the Merkava is it's greatest asset, to me at least.

Good tank, but i don't know that it's protected to the level the M-1A2SEP, Challenger II and Leopard 2 are.

nearly no western tank has an air condition. the latest leclerc has it and also the leo2a6 for spain and greek will get it. the nbc protection systems are mainly overpressure systems which simply pump filtered air inside the tank.

the compartment at the merks rear i nice, yes. but it is extremely small, has no seats and or places for personal gear. in addition it reduces the ammunition load if somebody is carried here. so don't overestimate it.

regards
axl
axl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2003, 15:08 PM   #14 (permalink)
TopHatter
Administrator
 
TopHatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-03-03
Location: Fort Myers FL
Posts: 9,693
Country:
Send a message via AIM to TopHatter
oh it's utility is certainly limited. This is an MBT, not an IFV of course. On the other hand, it does make for some interesting possibilities that are not available on other MBTs
TopHatter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2003, 15:31 PM   #15 (permalink)
Praxus
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-26-03
Posts: 3,237
Quote:
the compartment at the merks rear i nice, yes. but it is extremely small, has no seats and or places for personal gear. in addition it reduces the ammunition load if somebody is carried here. so don't overestimate it.
Please tell me, where in the history of the Merkava tanks were their long lasting tank battles and when they were far enough from Israel were they couldn't get rearmed.

Last edited by Praxus : 09-24-2003 at 15:36 PM.
Praxus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
T-95 vs M1A2 Lunatock Land Forces 181 02-11-2008 09:11 AM
Merkava to undergo updates.. then stop production? Catalan Land Forces 20 11-15-2006 21:45 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:59 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8