![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Military Professional
|
MoD Reply
"'There is no question of training being compromised.'” However, she added: “'We have adapted our training in terms of our operational requirement and we’re taking action in terms of the manning challenges.'”
Yes. They're "taking action in terms of the manning challenges". However, to suggest that training of 28 weeks cut to 14 isn't a "compromise[d]" is ludicrous. Of course it is. If everything taught in 28 weeks could be taught in 14, that's the way it would always have been done. This is serious change for the worse. How it can be viewed differently, I'm unsure.
__________________
"This aggression will not stand, man!" Jeff Lebowski |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Military Professional
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Military Professional
|
Quote:
"Hello passengers this is your Pilot speaking, by the way I've only finished half my training...do feel free to PANIC" ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Military Professional
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Banished
Regular
|
Never having been a commissioned member of ... well yeah,
Also, I'm not clear on what training is being "cut". I do recall that new arrivals required theatre specific training at once ... Especially Officers who (some of whom I'm forced to admit, were outstanding) Had little idea of the capabilities or limitations of the assets at their disposal. So ... what training is being cut. My point is that some training cannot and should not be cut, while other "trainings" cannot be administered with out knowledge of the particular conditions to be encountered. A fantastic step is the employment of experienced troops, state side... Preparing soldiers for the environment they will be placed in. I don't know exactly what this training consists of, but I do recall that new guys have a special knack of doing everything within their power to get a free flag. If any of this "adapted training" is cutting out useless training ... and adding survival skills, then I say "great, it's about time!". But I realize that would be asking a lot of the military. I have noted the seeming proliferation of SDM and upswing of Sniper applications... This is a good start ... however, If officers in command of said assets, are not clear upon aplication specifics, SOP , or indeed limitations of these units, they will be sqandered. So, no change there. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Death, the Destroyer of Worlds...
Senior Contributor
|
Can't help but wonder if this is going to affect me, since I'll probably be starting the CIC in about 3 months time, assuming I don't screw up at Selection.
At the end of the day, if I were to be one of said "half-trained" troops, it wouldn't effect by decision to join one bit.
__________________
"I have this to say to the people of Australia: Kick me, I'm different." |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Military Professional
|
The timing of Troop Training is very carefully worked out, its not a figure pulled out of the hat. At Depot level, soldiers not quite up to strength are given extra training either at the Depot or within their Regiments/battalions etc. To cut this training by half is nothing short of a panic move to get troops on the ground.
Hence: "One senior defence source admitted that the new recruits would not be properly qualified to fight since they would receive only 50 per cent of the basic training usually given to qualified combat infantrymen. “I would be very nervous of having to deploy with this limited level of expertise and experience" |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
WAB BOUNCER
Senior Contributor
|
Don't military units regardless of the nation have such a reputation?
__________________
In Iran people belive pepsi stands for pay each penny save israel. -urmomma158 The Russian Navy is still a threat, but only to those unlucky enough to be Russian sailors.-highsea |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Military Professional
|
t_igger_cs_30 & ShawnG Reply
"Well one thing is well known S-2, us Brits and Canucks have a reputation for adapting and making do
."Yes, Sergeant Major, you do. ""Adapt and overcome. Suck it up and drive on." So do our N.C.O.s. It is, however, a problem in officer country and not N.C.O. business. You guys are left with the clean-up of this foul-up by senior officers. EVERYBODY at some point does a smart salute and says," Yes sir, yes sir, three bags full". Training, however, is an immensely serious issue where generals need to fall on swords before giving in. Umm...especially when at war. That's what GENERALS get paid to do. ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Qaeda warns of attacks 'worse than 9/11' | xrough | International Defense Topics | 11 | 06-06-2007 11:55 AM |
| Average Iraqi's life is worse now | omon | The War in Iraq | 91 | 12-12-2006 18:48 PM |
| Socialism makes people worse | mtnbiker | Political Discussions | 53 | 04-01-2006 12:25 PM |
| Damage on USS Philadelphia is worse than expected | Saturn5 | Naval Forces | 3 | 09-16-2005 09:16 AM |
| Is Iraq Another Vietnam? Actually, It May Become Worse | lulldapull | The War in Iraq | 140 | 12-20-2004 12:34 PM |