ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Land Forces
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-31-2008, 10:17 AM   #1 (permalink)
T_igger_cs_30
Military Professional
 
T_igger_cs_30's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-04-07
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,943
Country:
It just keeps getting worse

If this is a true report

Half-trained troops to fight the Taleban - Times Online
__________________
<img src=http://C:\Documents and Settings\Wayne Smith\My Documents\002...My Pictures border=0 alt= />FEAR NAUGHT

I don't work here ...I am an analyst!
T_igger_cs_30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 11:58 AM   #2 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 15,688
Country:
Same crap, different bowl. I remember we (both the Brits and us) had the same problem with our reserves during UNPROFOR. We merely shifted the training to in theatre.
__________________
Chimo
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 12:03 PM   #3 (permalink)
T_igger_cs_30
Military Professional
 
T_igger_cs_30's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-04-07
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,943
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
Same crap, different bowl. I remember we (both the Brits and us) had the same problem with our reserves during UNPROFOR. We merely shifted the training to in theatre.
Training in theatre, prior too ops, advantage of aclimatisation(sp?)also,good point OoE, I hope you are right
T_igger_cs_30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 12:12 PM   #4 (permalink)
S-2
Military Professional
 
S-2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-11-06
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 2,057
Country:
MoD Reply

"'There is no question of training being compromised.'” However, she added: “'We have adapted our training in terms of our operational requirement and we’re taking action in terms of the manning challenges.'”

Yes. They're "taking action in terms of the manning challenges". However, to suggest that training of 28 weeks cut to 14 isn't a "compromise[d]" is ludicrous. Of course it is. If everything taught in 28 weeks could be taught in 14, that's the way it would always have been done.

This is serious change for the worse. How it can be viewed differently, I'm unsure.
__________________
"This aggression will not stand, man!" Jeff Lebowski
S-2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 12:21 PM   #5 (permalink)
T_igger_cs_30
Military Professional
 
T_igger_cs_30's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-04-07
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,943
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by S-2 View Post
"'There is no question of training being compromised.'” However, she added: “'We have adapted our training in terms of our operational requirement and we’re taking action in terms of the manning challenges.'”

Yes. They're "taking action in terms of the manning challenges". However, to suggest that training of 28 weeks cut to 14 isn't a "compromise[d]" is ludicrous. Of course it is. If everything taught in 28 weeks could be taught in 14, that's the way it would always have been done.

This is serious change for the worse. How it can be viewed differently, I'm unsure.
Well one thing is well known S-2, us Brits and Canucks have a reputation for adapting and making do
T_igger_cs_30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 12:56 PM   #6 (permalink)
dave lukins
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 01-04-07
Location: cheshire uk
Posts: 4,566
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by T_igger_cs_30 View Post
Well one thing is well known S-2, us Brits and Canucks have a reputation for adapting and making do
And we have always done so, but does it make it right? I just love the term "adapted our training" It doesn't take size 10s in hats to work that one out.

"Hello passengers this is your Pilot speaking, by the way I've only finished half my training...do feel free to PANIC"
dave lukins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 13:06 PM   #7 (permalink)
T_igger_cs_30
Military Professional
 
T_igger_cs_30's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-04-07
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,943
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by dave lukins View Post
And we have always done so, but does it make it right? I just love the term "adapted our training" It doesn't take size 10s in hats to work that one out.

"Hello passengers this is your Pilot speaking, by the way I've only finished half my training...do feel free to PANIC"
No Dave does not make it right, but nonetheless still true
T_igger_cs_30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 13:47 PM   #8 (permalink)
1 Observer
Banished
Regular
 
Join Date: 01-28-08
Location: Highplains
Posts: 123
Country:
Never having been a commissioned member of ... well yeah,
Also, I'm not clear on what training is being "cut". I do recall that new arrivals required theatre specific training at once ... Especially Officers who (some of whom I'm forced to admit, were outstanding) Had little idea of the capabilities or limitations of the assets at their disposal.
So ... what training is being cut.
My point is that some training cannot and should not be cut, while other "trainings" cannot be administered with out knowledge of the particular conditions to be encountered.
A fantastic step is the employment of experienced troops, state side... Preparing soldiers for the environment they will be placed in.
I don't know exactly what this training consists of, but I do recall that new guys have a special knack of doing everything within their power to get a free flag.
If any of this "adapted training" is cutting out useless training ... and adding survival skills, then I say "great, it's about time!". But I realize that would be asking a lot of the military.
I have noted the seeming proliferation of SDM and upswing of Sniper applications... This is a good start ... however, If officers in command of said assets, are not clear upon aplication specifics, SOP , or indeed limitations of these units, they will be sqandered. So, no change there.
1 Observer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 13:50 PM   #9 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 15,688
Country:
If history is any guide, section and platoon level training would be kept. Company and battalion would be delayed until in theatre.
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 14:09 PM   #10 (permalink)
-{SpoonmaN}-
Death, the Destroyer of Worlds...
Senior Contributor
 
-{SpoonmaN}-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-08-04
Location: The badlands of West London.
Posts: 1,455
Country:
Can't help but wonder if this is going to affect me, since I'll probably be starting the CIC in about 3 months time, assuming I don't screw up at Selection.
At the end of the day, if I were to be one of said "half-trained" troops, it wouldn't effect by decision to join one bit.
__________________
"I have this to say to the people of Australia: Kick me, I'm different."
-{SpoonmaN}- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 14:10 PM   #11 (permalink)
dave lukins
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 01-04-07
Location: cheshire uk
Posts: 4,566
Country:
The timing of Troop Training is very carefully worked out, its not a figure pulled out of the hat. At Depot level, soldiers not quite up to strength are given extra training either at the Depot or within their Regiments/battalions etc. To cut this training by half is nothing short of a panic move to get troops on the ground.

Hence: "One senior defence source admitted that the new recruits would not be properly qualified to fight since they would receive only 50 per cent of the basic training usually given to qualified combat infantrymen.

“I would be very nervous of having to deploy with this limited level of expertise and experience"
dave lukins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 15:50 PM   #12 (permalink)
Stan187
WAB BOUNCER
Senior Contributor
 
Stan187's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-06
Posts: 2,283
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by T_igger_cs_30 View Post
Well one thing is well known S-2, us Brits and Canucks have a reputation for adapting and making do
Don't military units regardless of the nation have such a reputation?
__________________
In Iran people belive pepsi stands for pay each penny save israel. -urmomma158
The Russian Navy is still a threat, but only to those unlucky enough to be Russian sailors.-highsea
Stan187 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 15:56 PM   #13 (permalink)
ShawnG
Military Professional
 
ShawnG's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-03-08
Location: in the State of Denial
Posts: 189
Country:
Send a message via AIM to ShawnG
"Adapt and overcome. Suck it up and drive on."
__________________
"Patriotism is not short, frenzied outbursts of emotion, but the tranquil and steady dedication of a lifetime." -Adlai E. Stevenson
ShawnG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 16:37 PM   #14 (permalink)
S-2
Military Professional
 
S-2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-11-06
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 2,057
Country:
t_igger_cs_30 & ShawnG Reply

"Well one thing is well known S-2, us Brits and Canucks have a reputation for adapting and making do ."

Yes, Sergeant Major, you do.

""Adapt and overcome. Suck it up and drive on."

So do our N.C.O.s.

It is, however, a problem in officer country and not N.C.O. business. You guys are left with the clean-up of this foul-up by senior officers. EVERYBODY at some point does a smart salute and says," Yes sir, yes sir, three bags full". Training, however, is an immensely serious issue where generals need to fall on swords before giving in. Umm...especially when at war.

That's what GENERALS get paid to do.
S-2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 17:17 PM   #15 (permalink)
T_igger_cs_30
Military Professional
 
T_igger_cs_30's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-04-07
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,943
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stan187 View Post
Don't military units regardless of the nation have such a reputation?
Of course ......just some more than others
T_igger_cs_30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Qaeda warns of attacks 'worse than 9/11' xrough International Defense Topics 11 06-06-2007 11:55 AM
Average Iraqi's life is worse now omon The War in Iraq 91 12-12-2006 18:48 PM
Socialism makes people worse mtnbiker Political Discussions 53 04-01-2006 12:25 PM
Damage on USS Philadelphia is worse than expected Saturn5 Naval Forces 3 09-16-2005 09:16 AM
Is Iraq Another Vietnam? Actually, It May Become Worse lulldapull The War in Iraq 140 12-20-2004 12:34 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:58 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8