ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Land Forces
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-05-2008, 21:41 PM   #16 (permalink)
Tronic
Navajo Code Talker
Senior Contributor
 
Tronic's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-27-04
Location: Patiala, India
Posts: 5,287
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Khan_Han View Post
DRDO Bhavan does not state that. According to them the T6 is a derivative of the Arjun.
T6 is derivative of Arjun? Links? And, Can you tell me the difference between the Arjun and the Bhim? They are entirely different class of weapons mate.

Quote:
It is also no secret that DENEL has been very active in this area in India.
DENEL, Elbit, IAI, Lockheed Martin, Dassault, and a whole list of other international defense companies have been very active in India, providing technical know-how where and when needed, it is no secret. But if that makes a system non-indegineous, then just how much indegineous do you think these new rifles and that Turkish turret you keep talking about are?

Quote:
Do you know of any Indian company which specifically has been incorporated to design, test and manufacture turrets?
DRDO for the entire Arjun project, but for the turret, more specifically, CVRDE.

Quote:
They have all been the product of joint-ventures and co-production between DRDO and International Firms.
If they were all "joint-ventures", then all these weapons and the Indian defense industry would have been sunk during sanctions, my friend.
__________________
Nabha Sparasham Deeptam
-Touch The Sky With Glory
Tronic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2008, 23:47 PM   #17 (permalink)
Khan_Han
Banished
 
Join Date: 11-16-07
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 205
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tronic View Post
T6 is derivative of Arjun? Links? And, Can you tell me the difference between the Arjun and the Bhim? They are entirely different class of weapons mate.

Yes, yes we know the Arjun is an MBT and the Bhim is a self-propelled howitzer. However, there is commonality between both their chassis. In fact, there are Bridge layers and Armoured engineering vehicles also based on the Arjun MBT chassis.

Regarding the Arjun...I can simply say that there is alot of foreign support. The armour of the Arjun is a variant of the British "Chobhem" armor. The integrated semi-automatic fire control system based on ballistic computer is also not Indian but rather provided by the Spanish company "ENOSA". Add to this the German "MTU" 838 KA 501 ten cylinder diesel engine.



DENEL, Elbit, IAI, Lockheed Martin, Dassault, and a whole list of other international defense companies have been very active in India, providing technical know-how where and when needed, it is no secret. But if that makes a system non-indegineous, then just how much indegineous do you think these new rifles and that Turkish turret you keep talking about are?

I know for a fact that the Turkish MBT and Turrets amongst other items are or will be 100% Turkish made. This is because the current Turkish Government has insisted on innovation rather than procurement. They are paying double of what it will cost to purchase in order to develop it themselves. Turkish Laws have also been amended in this regard. The current Turkish Prime Minister has stated that they expect Turkey to be one of the major weapons producing countries within 10 years. In fact, that is why a majority of US companies is having alot of trouble selling Turkey weapons.


DRDO for the entire Arjun project, but for the turret, more specifically, CVRDE.

CVRDE has had foreign support. This cannot be denied. There is evidence of this all over the web.



If they were all "joint-ventures", then all these weapons and the Indian defense industry would have been sunk during sanctions, my friend.
I did not say "all" Indian weapons are the product of joint-ventures. India in actual fact produces some originals weapons.
Khan_Han is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 02:26 AM   #18 (permalink)
Tronic
Navajo Code Talker
Senior Contributor
 
Tronic's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-27-04
Location: Patiala, India
Posts: 5,287
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Khan_Han View Post
Yes, yes we know the Arjun is an MBT and the Bhim is a self-propelled howitzer. However, there is commonality between both their chassis. In fact, there are Bridge layers and Armoured engineering vehicles also based on the Arjun MBT chassis.
Khan,

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tronic
Yes, the Bhim is an entirely different project (artillery and not a tank) and is suppose to be a hybrid between the Arjun and T6.


Quote:
The armour of the Arjun is a variant of the British "Chobhem" armor.
No, wrong again mate. India had approached the British ages ago to jointly develop a composite armour, the British refused and went on to develop the Chobbam. Arjun's Kanchan armour is a totally different project which uses different composites then the Chobbam armour.

Quote:
The integrated semi-automatic fire control system based on ballistic computer is also not Indian but rather provided by the Spanish company "ENOSA".
The Fire Control System on the Arjun is the BE (Bharat Electronics) AL-4421 Mk.1B Digital FCS. Bharat Electronics is an Indian company, not Spanish.

As for the whole FCS package like laser rangefinders, ballistic computers, sensors, etc etc; that is the child of IRDE.

Quote:
Add to this the German "MTU" 838 KA 501 ten cylinder diesel engine.
I'll give you that. India still does not have its own engine to place in the Arjun, but work is going on at CVRDE to produce a 1500hp engine for it. (I think the Germans refuse to sell the 1500hp engines they have in the Leo2).

Quote:
CVRDE has had foreign support. This cannot be denied. There is evidence of this all over the web.
Khan, no one is denying;

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tronic
DENEL, Elbit, IAI, Lockheed Martin, Dassault, and a whole list of other international defense companies have been very active in India, providing technical know-how where and when needed, it is no secret.


[btw, my mistake, CVRDE is not responsible for Arjun's turret, it is ARDE (Armament Research & Development Establishment)]

Anyways mate, Don't know how the discussion went from discussing turrets to the nuts and bolts of the Arjun, but I think that is enough of this thread hijack. If you want to discuss anything on the Arjun, feel free to PM me. btw, I'd be very interested to know what sources you are using for your info.

Quote:
I know for a fact that the Turkish MBT and Turrets amongst other items are or will be 100% Turkish made. This is because the current Turkish Government has insisted on innovation rather than procurement. They are paying double of what it will cost to purchase in order to develop it themselves. Turkish Laws have also been amended in this regard. The current Turkish Prime Minister has stated that they expect Turkey to be one of the major weapons producing countries within 10 years. In fact, that is why a majority of US companies is having alot of trouble selling Turkey weapons.
Funny, that is the same thing Indian leaders were dreaming of 30 years ago; the problem is not money, the problem is time. I have no doubts that Turkey can develop a 100% Turkish MBT, but for that, it will take quite a lot of time without any external know how. Maybe they can look at Indian projects and learn from our delays, when India was placed under sanctions, a lot of the components on the Arjun and more specifically the LCA had to be home-built. A simple thing like the landing gear which would take a few months to develop turned into years of development without any technical know how. Other countries have already gone through the process of building and making mistakes and then refining them. For you to do the same, you are looking at decades of development experience. However, I doubt that Turkish government is that naive; maybe that is why they choose to look at German turrets rather then go on, on their own?

Last edited by Tronic : 01-06-2008 at 02:42 AM.
Tronic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 03:19 AM   #19 (permalink)
troung
A Self Important
Senior Contributor
 
troung's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 4,233
Country:
Quote:
Not the differences!
Ok the scope is Canadian - BTW with a rail system the scopes and backup sights can be changed.

They didn't reinvent the ****ing wheel here...
__________________
To sit down with these men and deal with them as the representatives of an enlightened and civilized people is to deride ones own dignity and to invite the disaster of their treachery - General Matthew Ridgway
troung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 06:23 AM   #20 (permalink)
Big K
HürGeneral
Senior Contributor
 
Big K's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-11-06
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 1,046
Country:
Send a message via Skype™ to Big K
i am not a pro. about rifles but it doesnt look a new rifle...quite similar to m16/m4's isnt it?
__________________
When i say, there will be no effect but i am not willing to remain silent.
-Fuzuli
Big K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 06:34 AM   #21 (permalink)
Khan_Han
Banished
 
Join Date: 11-16-07
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 205
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by troung View Post
Ok the scope is Canadian - BTW with a rail system the scopes and backup sights can be changed.

They didn't reinvent the ****ing wheel here...
The butt is different too and so are the mechanisms...

MKEK will manufacture 1.2 million units of this rifle over a period of 6 years. The first batch of 300,000 units is expected to enter service within 12 months.
Khan_Han is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 14:12 PM   #22 (permalink)
-{SpoonmaN}-
Death, the Destroyer of Worlds...
Senior Contributor
 
-{SpoonmaN}-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-08-04
Location: The badlands of West London.
Posts: 1,455
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Khan_Han View Post



Not the differences!

I'm afraid I don't see a lot of evidence of new design in the picture, since most of those mods and optics can be mail-ordered from Soldier Of Fortune magazine.

However the internal workings may be different I don't know.
__________________
"I have this to say to the people of Australia: Kick me, I'm different."
-{SpoonmaN}- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 15:23 PM   #23 (permalink)
ace16807
Regular
 
ace16807's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-01-08
Location: TN
Posts: 77
Country:
Send a message via AIM to ace16807 Send a message via MSN to ace16807 Send a message via Yahoo to ace16807 Send a message via Skype™ to ace16807
It's probably modeled off the HK-416 aesthetically, but internal, meh. I don't know about that. Can't say it's indigenous unless the internal workings are really something new and effective.
ace16807 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 15:31 PM   #24 (permalink)
troung
A Self Important
Senior Contributor
 
troung's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 4,233
Country:
If one opens it up it is either an HK-416 or M-4/M-16...

Not really inventing fire here...
troung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 15:44 PM   #25 (permalink)
AK Fan
New Member
 
Join Date: 03-24-07
Posts: 8
Turkey unveils...

Nothing strange. MKEK has a many years of producing H&K small arms (assault rifles, machine guns etc) by licence behind it. Now they think they are grown-up enough to start up their own production based of course on their previous experience of learning from H&K.
AK Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 21:24 PM   #26 (permalink)
omon
Field mechanik
Senior Contributor
 
omon's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-01-06
Location: bk
Posts: 1,921
Country:
i doubt internals are any different, from hk or m4, they even kept forward assist, so nothing new.
anyone who claims they are, post internal schematic,
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!" B. Franklin
omon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 23:58 PM   #27 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,353
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tronic View Post
Britain, US, France, (China?), Russia, Germany, India; thats 7 and counting, no?
You forgot about Japan and South Korea.
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 00:04 AM   #28 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,353
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Khan_Han View Post
DRDO Bhavan does not state that. According to them the T6 is a derivative of the Arjun. It is also no secret that DENEL has been very active in this area in India. Do you know of any Indian company which specifically has been incorporated to design, test and manufacture turrets? They have all been the product of joint-ventures and co-production between DRDO and International Firms.
So it's a derivative of the M-4, which is a derivative of the M-16, which was a modified AR-15 designed by Eugene Stoner. Many countries have done that. There are even M-4 derivatives with the buffer spring moved to the top of the rifle so it could be fitted with a folding stock.

I would like to see this rifle's inside, especially the recoil mechanism to see which branch it belongs to.
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 01:10 AM   #29 (permalink)
Khan_Han
Banished
 
Join Date: 11-16-07
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 205
Country:
HK-416


Mehmetcik-1 (With some other Turkish made Snipers etc)


MKEK of Turkey, has stated that there has been cooperation with H&K (The German company which manufactures the HK-416) regarding the ergonomics of the rifle design. The bolts, mechanism etc are a Turkish design.

I am trying to get some pictures of these parts.
Khan_Han is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 12:48 PM   #30 (permalink)
K Mehta
Regular
 
Join Date: 10-24-07
Posts: 43
Country:
well it does seem to be inspired by the features of HK-416. Nice looking.
K Mehta is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Greatest Turkish Empires AlpErTunga Ancient & Medieval 177 01-12-2008 07:49 AM
future Turkish war scenarios Gazi International Defense Topics 13 12-14-2007 20:08 PM
Declaration from Turkish General Staff against anti-secularists Big K International Politics 47 05-02-2007 06:29 AM
The Impacts Of Turkey’s Geopolitics And Geostrategical Position On Our Foreign Policy Gazi International Defense Topics 0 01-25-2006 10:39 AM
Turkey and EU: rough road ahead Ray The Western Alliance 1 10-11-2005 15:14 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:12 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8