ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Land Forces
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-30-2007, 12:49 PM   #1 (permalink)
Silent Hunter
Contributor
 
Silent Hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-09-07
Location: London, UK
Posts: 500
Country:
Send a message via MSN to Silent Hunter
Marksmanship of different military forces?

Whose military forces are generally perceived to be the best and worst shots in small-arms fire?
Silent Hunter is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2007, 13:14 PM   #2 (permalink)
glyn
Military Professional
 
glyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-15-06
Location: Penzance, Cornwall UK
Posts: 6,368
As a certain tennis player once famously remarked "You cannot be serious!"
__________________
Semper in excretum. Solum profunda variat.
glyn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2007, 13:26 PM   #3 (permalink)
omon
Field mechanik
Senior Contributor
 
omon's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-01-06
Location: bk
Posts: 1,869
Country:
this question makes as much sence, as would, who has cleanest uniform.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!" B. Franklin
omon is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2007, 14:24 PM   #4 (permalink)
S-2
Military Professional
 
S-2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-11-06
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 2,040
Country:
McEnroe

Uh, Glyn, I think it's the only phrase that he knew. As such, John remained mute all year until Wimbleton.

Of course, before God, Queen, and country, he'd show off his mastery of our shared language. While phrases were limited to one, J.E. had a large vocabulary of !#@$%@# and his favorite, (of course) *&^#$@!

One of America's finer examples of public decorum while abroad. As talented a tennis player as he was, he nonetheless missed his true calling serving our nation from foggy bottom.
__________________
"This aggression will not stand, man!" Jeff Lebowski
S-2 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2007, 15:16 PM   #5 (permalink)
Silent Hunter
Contributor
 
Silent Hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-09-07
Location: London, UK
Posts: 500
Country:
Send a message via MSN to Silent Hunter
I'm deadly serious. I'm interested.
Silent Hunter is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2007, 17:22 PM   #6 (permalink)
Debbie
WAB Cautioner of Poo
Senior Contributor
 
Debbie's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-20-06
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 3,272
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by glyn View Post
As a certain tennis player once famously remarked "You cannot be serious!"
He made me want to watch tennis. A great feat mind you.
__________________
And I close my eyes, and I kiss that frog. Each time finding the more boys I meet, the more I love my dog ------ More Boys I Meet - Carrie Underwood
Debbie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2007, 18:14 PM   #7 (permalink)
Feanor
Banished
 
Join Date: 06-12-07
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,385
Country:
Cats. That's right, the cat army.

Feanor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2007, 02:11 AM   #8 (permalink)
RustyBattleship
Defense Professional
 
RustyBattleship's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-06
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 2,665
I consider this a serious question and a serious matter.

The Army and the Marines stress more on individual marksmanship than the Navy or the Air Force. When my brother joined the AF he blew their minds away qualifying as expert his first time up on the range. He credits me for teaching him how to shoot in the first place.

Rifle and pistol training is supposed to be the same in all services, but the Navy and Air Force are a bit more cavalier about it because they don't expect to be in the front lines like the Army or Marines. Therefore they are just satisfied that you shoot well enough while on guard duty.

However, the Air Force does have more intense pistol training programs for air crews (that might have to parachute into enemy territory) and Military Police.

In the Navy, security forces that have to respond to "INTRUDER ALERT" aboard ships are selected from their marksmanship records. But lately they have only been worried about small boats and are pretty well trained with the .50 caliber M2 Machinegun and the 25 mm Chain Gun.

I base this on the armory capacity of the Battleships in the 1980's. For a crew of 1500 men they may have had up to 100 rifles on board. Probably only 50 and about a dozen handguns. The 44 man Marine Detachment however had all assigned personal weapons and were the main "INTRUDER ALERT" respondents (though they weren't supposed to be according to some desk clerk back in NAVSEA).
__________________
Able to leap tall tales in a single groan.
RustyBattleship is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2007, 10:36 AM   #9 (permalink)
Silent Hunter
Contributor
 
Silent Hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-09-07
Location: London, UK
Posts: 500
Country:
Send a message via MSN to Silent Hunter
Thanks for that. What about other forces?
Silent Hunter is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2007, 13:51 PM   #10 (permalink)
kato
Patron
 
Join Date: 09-05-06
Posts: 208
Country:
Germany, at least in the late 90s, didn't put much worth on individual marksmanship. There's a standard everyone has to keep, beyond that is just a "bonus" for the squad that soldier is assigned to.

Consequently, there isn't (or at least wasn't back then) much training in that regard either. As long as you passed the standards every year or so, that meant you had enough training. Training is meant to bring everyone up to the regulatory standard, not beyond; keeping your ability up to that (same) standard is required to serve in pretty much any function in the Bundeswehr.

There are a few marksmanship awards in Germany (the Schützenschnur stuff), but you pretty much don't get these for an individual excellent result with a particular weapon, but for consistent results at a-standard-better-than-regular-standard across the board with all small arms in your platoon's STAN outfit.

Regular standards in the Bundeswehr (Heer/Army) emphasize rifle and - to some extent - (L)MG shooting capability btw. There are very few pistol exercises (focussing on "being able to hit your target(s) when you absolutely have to use a pistol"), and SMGs are only trained in those units where it's part of the STAN outfit anyway.
kato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2007, 15:27 PM   #11 (permalink)
toemag
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 01-28-07
Location: Bavaria
Posts: 324
Country:
All of our Service personnel are excellent shot's , our enemy's marksmanship is a joke , well we hope so anyway .

Tony
__________________
Yet another ex-tankie of 1 RTR origin.
toemag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2008, 05:26 AM   #12 (permalink)
Ucar
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 06-19-07
Posts: 292
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silent Hunter View Post
Thanks for that. What about other forces?
In the Turkish Army, the standard training for conscripts have a shooting curriculum which is selectively applied. Most conscripts will shoot between 3-40 rounds in their 15 months of service. In units that are stationed in SE Turkey, and in sensitive zones, this is more vigorously enforced, and conscripts have a better shooting training.

Turkish Army does not hold specialist shooting courses for its conscripts who constitute a majority of its armed personnel. Our average conscript rifleman's marksmanship is between abysmal to poor.

On the other hand, professional and semi-professional soldiers especially among NCO's, receive relatively good training and it is possible to rate their marksmenship as average to good.

In selective units, especially those that conduct continious security missions, and have high readiness, shooting skills courses are organized for conscripts as well.
Ucar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2008, 12:02 PM   #13 (permalink)
Albany Rifles
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Albany Rifles's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-27-07
Location: Prince George, VA
Posts: 971
Country:
A Sea Change

As an old US Army infantryman I would nod my hat to the USMC who have always had outstanding marksmanship training. The Army's infantry got away some but started to bring it back in the late 1990s. The US Army learned its lesson the hard way (does the 507th MT CO and Jessica Lynch come to mind?) and has really increased its marksmanship for everyone. I work on FT Lee, VA, home of the Quartermaster Corps and I can tell you the firing on th eranges is not quite 24/7 but it is close. Troops are always using the simulator building and firing on the ranges. I beleive our support troops have increased their weaposn raining by several orders of magnitude. And this is a good thing since logistics soldiers are the ones fighting along the supply lines. The Army has about reached the level of dedication of the Marine Corps; I am not sure we have received their level of proficiency yet.
__________________
“When the gods wish to punish us, they answer our prayers.” — Oscar Wilde
Albany Rifles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2008, 14:27 PM   #14 (permalink)
RustyBattleship
Defense Professional
 
RustyBattleship's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-06
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 2,665
Quote:
Originally Posted by Albany Rifles View Post
The Army has about reached the level of dedication of the Marine Corps; I am not sure we have received their level of proficiency yet.
At least they are reaching for it. Since I lived only 2 miles from a shooting range (back in the 50's and 60's) I bought my own .45 1911, M-1 Carbine, M-1 Garand and 03-A3 Springfield and taught myself how to shoot.
RustyBattleship is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2008, 14:37 PM   #15 (permalink)
Albany Rifles
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Albany Rifles's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-27-07
Location: Prince George, VA
Posts: 971
Country:
I qualified expert on literally every weapon I used in the Army, from M1911A1 through Bradley Fighting Vehicle (990 first time Table VIII Baby!!!) That included M16, HG, M203, M60, M2, 81 mm mortar, 107mm mortar, DRAGON & TOW. Of course, as an officer, I did not wear qualification badges....but you bet there is one banging around in my foot locker somewhere.

And as I remind my son where did I learn to shoot so well? Boy Scout summer camp!
Albany Rifles is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Top Ten Chinese Military Modernization Developments oneman28 International Defense Topics 96 06-23-2008 01:49 AM
Russian Military Doctrine rickusn The Western Alliance 216 02-12-2007 18:28 PM
Brigadier, Maruf's new BdA-InA tirade at CDF Officer of Engineers The Field Mess 34 08-24-2005 11:27 AM
Quagmire or not? Shek The War in Iraq 72 07-04-2005 12:18 PM
Doctrine: Total Peoples Defense troung Land Forces 17 07-02-2005 01:46 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:10 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8