ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Land Forces
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-19-2007, 22:20 PM   #31 (permalink)
temujin77
Patron
 
Join Date: 12-05-06
Posts: 203
Country:
Thanks to you all, I've updated the caption:

"African-American troops of the 1st Bn, 24th Infantry Rgmt, US Army Americal Div behind a mid-production M4 Sherman tank, near Empress Augusta Bay, Bougainville, Solomon Islands, circa early 1944"

The link to the photo is here:
WW2DB: [Photo] African-American troops of the 1st Bn, 24th Infantry Rgmt, US Army Americal Div behind a mid-production M4 Sherman tank, near Empress Augusta Bay, Bougainville, Solomon Islands, circa early 1944

As for credits, you can find them in the comments section shortly
__________________
Pete
World War II Database
temujin77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 19:17 PM   #32 (permalink)
Gun Grape
Resident Curmudgeon
Military Professional
 
Gun Grape's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-12-05
Location: Panama City Fl
Posts: 2,566
Quote:
Originally Posted by Albany Rifles View Post
The newest version of M1A2 is a field modification for use in Iraq. The phone is not going to be adopted as a permanent item.
.
I know the MC was pushing for a phone since day one. The MC M-1s started getting phones in 01-02. And from the AARs from OIF everyone loved them.

Why doesn't the Army want to keep them?
Gun Grape is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 19:54 PM   #33 (permalink)
smilingassassin
Senior Contributor
 
smilingassassin's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-12-03
Location: Vancouver Canada
Posts: 2,719
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shipwreck View Post
Not the M4A3 since no engine grill doors.
The prefered model for American forces was the M4A3, the only version I can find that comes close is the M4A6. It would be alot easier if we had a front view of the nose.
__________________
Facts to a liberal is like Kryptonite to Superman.

-- Larry Elder
smilingassassin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 20:07 PM   #34 (permalink)
zraver
Contrary by nature.
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 10-22-06
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 2,532
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by smilingassassin View Post
The prefered model for American forces was the M4A3, the only version I can find that comes close is the M4A6. It would be alot easier if we had a front view of the nose.
Its not an M4 the turret lacks the ammo loading door, I stand by the M4A3 designation.
zraver is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 22:32 PM   #35 (permalink)
RustyBattleship
Defense Professional
 
RustyBattleship's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-06
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 2,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by zraver View Post
Its not an M4 the turret lacks the ammo loading door, I stand by the M4A3 designation.
There is not question that it is an M4A3. But what variant can be difficult as the E1 to E8(?) variations are often very minute details and don't always show up in most photos.

Yes, one of the GIs there is on the tank's phone line for communication directly with the crew. This works fine when the engine is turned off. The twin exhausts on my M-41 would singe the whiskers of anybody within 5 feet and the noise is even worse than inside the driver's pit.
__________________
Able to leap tall tales in a single groan.
RustyBattleship is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2007, 00:12 AM   #36 (permalink)
Triple C
Contributor
 
Join Date: 04-10-06
Posts: 680
The suspension doesn't look like HVSS to me. I don't think it's an E8 whatever else it maybe.
__________________
What benefits the body is called medicine; what benefits the soul, discipline.
-Augustine of Hippo
Triple C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2007, 05:15 AM   #37 (permalink)
dalem
Lord High Hullabalooster
Senior Contributor
 
dalem's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Columbia Heights, MN
Posts: 8,323
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Triple C View Post
The suspension doesn't look like HVSS to me. I don't think it's an E8 whatever else it maybe.
I agree. That is NOT the HVSS suspension. It also looks like it does not have the larger commander's cupola so that eliminates the later models. I'm going with the M4A2(L) for my guess.

-dale
dalem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2007, 07:53 AM   #38 (permalink)
Shipwreck
Resident Mythbuster
Senior Contributor
 
Shipwreck's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-07-06
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 2,030
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by smilingassassin View Post
The prefered model for American forces was the M4A3, the only version I can find that comes close is the M4A6.
Quote:
Originally Posted by zraver View Post
Its not an M4 the turret lacks the ammo loading door, I stand by the M4A3 designation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RustyBattleship View Post
There is not question that it is an M4A3.
On the M4A3 :

* The rear armor reached below the sponson line (as on the M4A2)

* The rear deck engine grill doors ran from sponson to sponson (approx. as wide as the turret bustle on the M4A2)

The tank shown here has an *inverted U backplate* (as Wiki calls it ) and no grill doors.

Therefore it is NOT an M4A3.
Attached Images
File Type: gif m4a3 sherman.gif (26.0 KB, 21 views)
__________________
"Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called children of God" (Matthew 5:9)

Last edited by Shipwreck : 09-21-2007 at 08:55 AM.
Shipwreck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2007, 08:23 AM   #39 (permalink)
Shipwreck
Resident Mythbuster
Senior Contributor
 
Shipwreck's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-07-06
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 2,030
Country:
The engine compartment provide some key identifying features which the M4 shares with the M4A1, i.e. :

Rear hull :
* twin access doors,
* air cleaners at the top outer corners of the doors,
* twin square muffler tailpipes at the top of the rear hull above the air cleaners

Rear deck :
* steel-covered air intake behind the turret
* solid engine access doors behind the air intake

You can make out some of these features on the picture below showing a late-production M4 from the Detroit Diesel Arsenal (with a hybrid cast/welded hull).

Since the tank shown here is a welded hull Sherman, it is either an early-production M4 or a mid-production M4.

Either way, it remains an M4.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg M4 late-production.jpg (66.1 KB, 19 views)

Last edited by Shipwreck : 09-21-2007 at 08:57 AM.
Shipwreck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2007, 08:31 AM   #40 (permalink)
Albany Rifles
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Albany Rifles's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-27-07
Location: Prince George, VA
Posts: 1,019
Country:
Gun Grape

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gun Grape View Post
I know the MC was pushing for a phone since day one. The MC M-1s started getting phones in 01-02. And from the AARs from OIF everyone loved them.

Why doesn't the Army want to keep them?
The Army loves them too but remember this is for a special field mod kit for use in urban environment.

The IK will still be there but the intention is to mount them only when needed by mission. I have seen what happens to sponsons boxes, etc on M1s and M2s when in a jungle/forest environment. Things tend to get bashed into uselessness.
__________________
"Always with the negative waves Moriarty, always with the negative waves." TSGT Oddball, Tank Commander
Albany Rifles is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best Tank of WWII Wraith601 The World Wars 384 07-23-2008 13:59 PM
Could Germany have won WWII Recon_sgt The World Wars 1889 07-14-2008 01:29 AM
Lessons from 1965 and 1971 wars Ray South Asian Defense Topics 22 09-10-2007 21:53 PM
Indian Army Satisfied With Arjun MBTs Performance Tronic South Asian Defense Topics 55 06-03-2007 18:20 PM
T-55 VS M48 Patton RepublicanGuard Land Forces 23 05-12-2006 15:24 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:55 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8