ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Land Forces
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-16-2007, 00:18 AM   #1 (permalink)
Bluesman
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Bluesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Vacaville, CA.
Posts: 7,387
Country:
And the answer is:

Quote:
Originally Posted by colonelf40
Who do you think would win between the 8 most powerfull nations of the middle east/south asia?

EGYPT
INDIA
ISRAEL
IRAN
PAKISTAN
SAUDI ARABIA
SYRIA
TURKEY

no nukes!

in this war it will be every nation for themselves!
no outside help from u.s/russia/china/e.u/nato
The answer is, of course...we ALL win.

This place needs a Twit Detector that'll go off when these schmendricks register for membership.
__________________
"The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it, and if one finds the prospect of a long war intolerable, it is natural to disbelieve in the possibility of victory."
- George Orwell
Bluesman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 00:28 AM   #2 (permalink)
Parihaka
Moderator
 
Parihaka's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-10-04
Location: Te Ika a Maui
Posts: 9,465
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluesman View Post
This place needs a Twit Detector that'll go off when these schmendricks register for membership.
That twit detector (oh my joy on discovering that twit is a word common to our cultures) would be me, but I like to leave some lying around so you have something to eat for breakfast
__________________
In the realm of spirit, seek clarity; in the material world, seek utility.
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
Parihaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 04:14 AM   #3 (permalink)
Stan187
WAB BOUNCER
Senior Contributor
 
Stan187's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-06
Posts: 2,325
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluesman View Post
The answer is, of course...we ALL win.

This place needs a Twit Detector that'll go off when these schmendricks register for membership.
YOU'RE OUR TWIT DETECTOR! lol
__________________
In Iran people belive pepsi stands for pay each penny save israel. -urmomma158
The Russian Navy is still a threat, but only to those unlucky enough to be Russian sailors.-highsea
Stan187 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 04:47 AM   #4 (permalink)
glyn
Military Professional
 
glyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-15-06
Location: Penzance, Cornwall UK
Posts: 6,537
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stan187 View Post
YOU'RE OUR TWIT DETECTOR! lol
I think that those people wishing to join WAB and post here should have to complete a public profile and then make a formal introduction. Members should have 10 days or so to object to the candidate, who if he/she is thought acceptable can then start posting. This will stop the occasional advertiser and at least some sock puppets.
__________________
Semper in excretum. Solum profunda variat.
glyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 05:05 AM   #5 (permalink)
THL
Senior Contributor
 
THL's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-23-05
Location: 35 minutes outside Chicago (please don't refer to it as "Chi-Town"...that's annoying)
Posts: 5,690
Country:
Send a message via AIM to THL Send a message via Yahoo to THL
Good idea, Glyn
I joined a different message board recently and that it what I had to do to become a member...I had to send in a bio on myself and then that had to be approved by a moderator on that board before I could post.
__________________
"To dream of the person you would like to be is to waste the person you are."-Sholem Asch

"I always turn to the sports page first, which records people's accomplishments. The front page has nothing but man's failures."-Earl Warren

"I didn't intend for this to take on a political tone. I'm just here for the drugs."-Nancy Reagan, when asked a political question at a "Just Say No" rally

"He no play-a da game, he no make-a da rules."-Earl Butz, on the Pope's attitude toward birth control
THL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 12:39 PM   #6 (permalink)
Bluesman
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Bluesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Vacaville, CA.
Posts: 7,387
Country:
I like our current 'Open Borders' policy, strangely enough. It's not that I object to letting just ANYbody join (kinda LIKE that aspect, actually). It's just maybe I wish we could all drop the n00b offenders (y'all know of my famously-low tolerance by now, I'm sure ) into a virtual Waring blender and set it to 'Annihilate', so we can all enjoy a FrootLoop Smoothie first thing in the morning.

I suppose we have to be ready to absorb the irritations. I'll try harder to do that myself. Oh, I'll still wield the N00b Hammer with the ruthlessness that I always have, but instead of putting up the razor wire and minefields, I guess we'll just deal with it, and let the established members have some fun with the chew toys. (Hey, who was it that introduced that phrase, anyway? I really like it. )
Bluesman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 13:46 PM   #7 (permalink)
dalem
Lord High Hullabalooster
Senior Contributor
 
dalem's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Columbia Heights, MN
Posts: 8,323
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluesman View Post
I like our current 'Open Borders' policy, strangely enough. It's not that I object to letting just ANYbody join (kinda LIKE that aspect, actually). It's just maybe I wish we could all drop the n00b offenders (y'all know of my famously-low tolerance by now, I'm sure ) into a virtual Waring blender and set it to 'Annihilate', so we can all enjoy a FrootLoop Smoothie first thing in the morning.

I suppose we have to be ready to absorb the irritations. I'll try harder to do that myself. Oh, I'll still wield the N00b Hammer with the ruthlessness that I always have, but instead of putting up the razor wire and minefields, I guess we'll just deal with it, and let the established members have some fun with the chew toys. (Hey, who was it that introduced that phrase, anyway? I really like it. )
I think I was the "chew toy" guy.

-dale
dalem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 18:35 PM   #8 (permalink)
zraver
Contrary by nature.
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 10-22-06
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 2,532
Country:
I enjoy the noob questions, the answers to them serve a very useful education purpose. A recent noob question US vs NK ave me some updated insight into current US Army deployments in South Korea and if the noob is willing a treasure trove of solid critically based thinking for him to ponder.
zraver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 19:04 PM   #9 (permalink)
entropy
Senior Reader
Senior Contributor
 
entropy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-19-07
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,628
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by glyn View Post
I think that those people wishing to join WAB and post here should have to complete a public profile and then make a formal introduction. Members should have 10 days or so to object to the candidate, who if he/she is thought acceptable can then start posting. This will stop the occasional advertiser and at least some sock puppets.
If objecting a canditate, a vote should be held, with Contributors having 1 vote point, Senior contributor 1 per 500 posts, Defence and Military Professionals 5 votes + one per 500 posts. The Moderators are not allowed to vote, but then they can rig the elections!
__________________
If memory serves...

entropy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 19:11 PM   #10 (permalink)
entropy
Senior Reader
Senior Contributor
 
entropy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-19-07
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,628
Country:
And new members should read some threads and integrate themselves into the local culture before they start posting. Read which subjects are not preferred and the like. And it would be a good idea to allow them to sign a "user agreement" where they swear that they should not open India vs Pakistan threads, compare apples to oranges, or proclaiming that some particular item of military gear is the best.

In the meanwhile, we could have a fun game. We start typical pissing contest threads, and we see which moderator locks them first. First to lock 5 wins.
entropy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 19:13 PM   #11 (permalink)
crooks
Green, White 'n Orange
Senior Contributor
 
crooks's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-17-06
Location: Blarney, County Cork, Ireland
Posts: 1,291
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by entropy View Post
If objecting a canditate, a vote should be held, with Contributors having 1 vote point, Senior contributor 1 per 500 posts, Defence and Military Professionals 5 votes + one per 500 posts. The Moderators are not allowed to vote, but then they can rig the elections!
Interesting entropy, would this require much coding (question for mod or admin)?
__________________
'Liberty - it is newly strung and shall be heard.' - Motto of the United Irishmen.
crooks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 20:36 PM   #12 (permalink)
ArmchairGeneral
Devil's Advocate
Senior Contributor
 
ArmchairGeneral's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-03-06
Location: The boonies of NC, USA.
Posts: 2,746
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalem View Post
I think I was the "chew toy" guy.

-dale
Somehow I thought it was 2DREZQ, but I think it was definitely one of you two.
__________________
"Apocalyptic thought is curiously pleasurable."
-Theodore Dalrymple
ArmchairGeneral is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2007, 17:06 PM   #13 (permalink)
YellowFever
Contributor
 
YellowFever's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-17-06
Location: In front of my computer...duh!
Posts: 502
Originally Posted by colonelf40
Who do you think would win between the 8 most powerfull nations of the middle east/south asia?

EGYPT
INDIA
ISRAEL
IRAN
PAKISTAN
SAUDI ARABIA
SYRIA
TURKEY

no nukes!

in this war it will be every nation for themselves!
no outside help from u.s/russia/china/e.u/nato






Hmmm...this is a tough one.

Given the geo-politics at play, not to mention the terrains and the military hardware each country uses, I have come to the conclusion that Israel or India would win in any military conflict since I've only tasted their food and none of the others.
__________________
...If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space!
YellowFever is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:12 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8