![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
HürGeneral
Senior Contributor
|
Going to War in a "Tankette"??
![]() Polish TK3? ![]() or an Italian Semovente 75/34? What was the main idea of Tankette? cheaper? easy to hide?? what was it?
__________________
When i say, there will be no effect but i am not willing to remain silent. -Fuzuli |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Field mechanik
Senior Contributor
|
the idea was popular between ww1 and ww2, recon, suppresion of mashine gun points, mechanize infantry, early ww1 tanks were not fast enough to keep up with infantry, so lighter vehicle was needed, they didn,t prove to be especially effective, in ww2 and after, with development of anti tank, ap weapons, punzerfaust, recoiless rifle, later rpg, these things are useless, they were designed to protect crew from small arms fire, flack, they stand no chance against antitank weapons of ww2 and latter on, you'd be better off on a fast motorcycle. france instaled a 75mm recoiles gun on a vespa scooter, to deal with lav.
ussr had a few light tanks in ww2 t60, t70. they cost almost as much as t34, while being inferiour to it, it was used for recon..ect, some could swim but this was miniscule advantage, only usefull in recon. nowadays those things are replaced with btr,bmp, and other, Last edited by omon : 05-08-2007 at 17:06 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Regular
|
Quote:
My bad, that tube is way too small to be a TOW. Some shoulder-fired anti-tank weapon more likely. Here's the TOW version: http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...wiesel-001.jpg Last edited by lazybastard : 05-08-2007 at 17:52 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Resident Mythbuster
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
As shown on the pic, ATGW is the Euromissile HOT-2 and gun is the GIAT 20mm M621.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
HürGeneral
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
i thing this was one of the bravest and noblest thing in human history. i admire and respect those who sacrifice their lives for their country all around the world. my point was about the idea of tankette and and also tried to attract the attentions on this idea, going to war against full size panzers with tankettes takes a lot of courage. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | ||
|
Regular
|
Quote:
behind a turn on the road. Poles followed them and came upon tanks advancing. Not being able to turn around (due to speed and momentum) they rode on, past tanks. They did not charge them. But this myth continues because it's useful to both. Germans point to it how stupid and crazy Poles were and Poles point to it to show how brave they were.Quote:
However if your enemy were some natives with no AT weapons then they could do their job. If enemy had AT weapons less so. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Contrary by nature.
Military Professional
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Staff Emeritus
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Contrary by nature.
Military Professional
|
Poland inflicted over 50,000 causalties on Germany, but they never had a chance. Germanies border with Poland, Polands commitment to defend all of its borders, lack of mechanized transport, inferior airforce, and lack of tanks all combined to make the situation hopeless. Poland's only chance was a swift French invasion of the Saar. Once Poland's troops were encirlced on the Vistula, or trapped inside the Warsaw pocket it was all over.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How to Win in Iraq—and How to Lose | Ray | The War in Iraq | 4 | 03-29-2007 09:49 AM |
| So who moved the WMD? Someone did... | Anon | The War in Iraq | 53 | 03-16-2006 11:54 AM |
| Nervous in Baghdad | Shek | The War in Iraq | 0 | 07-18-2005 10:37 AM |
| No End to War. What the conservatives think of the Neo-thugs! | lulldapull | The Western Alliance | 14 | 02-13-2005 19:16 PM |
| Clinton and Iraq war | Major_Armstrong | Political Discussions | 10 | 12-24-2004 14:03 PM |