ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Land Forces
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-28-2007, 17:42 PM   #1 (permalink)
Sandman
Military Professional
 
Sandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-05-05
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 218
Country:
Thaad

What would a comparable Russian weapon be? An ABM or SA-12? How about Sprint and Spartan? What is the speed and range of THAAD? How does it rate? It seems to be performing well lately. Is it meant for defending US contenintal cities from ICBMs in their terminal phase?
Sandman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 20:36 PM   #2 (permalink)
-{SpoonmaN}-
Death, the Destroyer of Worlds...
Senior Contributor
 
-{SpoonmaN}-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-08-04
Location: The badlands of West London.
Posts: 1,455
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandman View Post
What would a comparable Russian weapon be? An ABM or SA-12? How about Sprint and Spartan? What is the speed and range of THAAD? How does it rate? It seems to be performing well lately. Is it meant for defending US contenintal cities from ICBMs in their terminal phase?
While I'm sure it could be used to defend CONUS like any other AD weapon, I think the primary role of the THAAD will be in defending US Expeditionary Forces from hostile missile attack.
__________________
"I have this to say to the people of Australia: Kick me, I'm different."
-{SpoonmaN}- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 02:31 AM   #3 (permalink)
Wraith601
Title Classified
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,144
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by -{SpoonmaN}- View Post
While I'm sure it could be used to defend CONUS like any other AD weapon, I think the primary role of the THAAD will be in defending US Expeditionary Forces from hostile missile attack.
One of the big selling points was that it was C-17 transportable and can be ready to fire in a something like 30 mins after landing.
__________________
"We always have been, we are, and I hope that we always shall be, detested in France."
-Sir Arthur Wellesley
Wraith601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 10:47 AM   #4 (permalink)
Sandman
Military Professional
 
Sandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-05-05
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 218
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wraith601 View Post
One of the big selling points was that it was C-17 transportable and can be ready to fire in a something like 30 mins after landing.
That is all and good, but would not a more important issue be to protect those west coast citied that North Korea, and China and even Russia hold at risk? Is there any, or much consideration to protect AMERICAN lives at home?
Sandman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 14:34 PM   #5 (permalink)
highsea
Defense Professional
 
highsea's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-10-04
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,465
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandman View Post
That is all and good, but would not a more important issue be to protect those west coast citied that North Korea, and China and even Russia hold at risk? Is there any, or much consideration to protect AMERICAN lives at home?
That's why we have sea-based Aegis BMD, interceptors in Japan, GBI in Alaska and California...

NMD is still in it's early stages. We have a long way yet to go.
__________________
My baby called me up. She said- Why don't you ever take me out? Pick me up in your brand new car....You shake the short change from the old fruit jar...
highsea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2007, 00:56 AM   #6 (permalink)
Wraith601
Title Classified
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,144
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by highsea View Post
That's why we have sea-based Aegis BMD, interceptors in Japan, GBI in Alaska and California...

NMD is still in it's early stages. We have a long way yet to go.
Not to mention ABL.

THAAD is only one of many possible systems under development.
Wraith601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2007, 19:55 PM   #7 (permalink)
-{SpoonmaN}-
Death, the Destroyer of Worlds...
Senior Contributor
 
-{SpoonmaN}-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-08-04
Location: The badlands of West London.
Posts: 1,455
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wraith601 View Post
One of the big selling points was that it was C-17 transportable and can be ready to fire in a something like 30 mins after landing.
Very handy indeed. What's the Patriot's usual readiness time again?
-{SpoonmaN}- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2007, 01:01 AM   #8 (permalink)
Wraith601
Title Classified
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,144
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by -{SpoonmaN}- View Post
Very handy indeed. What's the Patriot's usual readiness time again?
The Patriot can be brought to ready to fire state from movement posture in about 45 mins, not sure how that time changes after an airlift though.
Wraith601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2007, 22:47 PM   #9 (permalink)
urmomma158
the real plastic
Senior Contributor
 
urmomma158's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-05-06
Location: NJ Turnpike
Posts: 936
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wraith601 View Post
The Patriot can be brought to ready to fire state from movement posture in about 45 mins, not sure how that time changes after an airlift though.
That's pretty slow,I wonder why they never made a fully mobile variant of the PATRIOT instead of the semi mobile version they have now.
__________________
urmomma158 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2007, 23:05 PM   #10 (permalink)
Wraith601
Title Classified
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,144
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by urmomma158 View Post
That's pretty slow,I wonder why they never made a fully mobile variant of the PATRIOT instead of the semi mobile version they have now.
The PAC-2 missile is 5.31 meters long and weighs 900 kgs, it's hard to make a launcher and all the associated support equipment for a missile that big very mobile.
Wraith601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 14:10 PM   #11 (permalink)
urmomma158
the real plastic
Senior Contributor
 
urmomma158's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-05-06
Location: NJ Turnpike
Posts: 936
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wraith601 View Post
The PAC-2 missile is 5.31 meters long and weighs 900 kgs, it's hard to make a launcher and all the associated support equipment for a missile that big very mobile.
The russians managae to do it with the S300's. They can shoot and scoot in about 5 minutes. I think germany operates mobile PATRIOT launchers i've seen some pics of em online.
urmomma158 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 17:35 PM   #12 (permalink)
highsea
Defense Professional
 
highsea's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-10-04
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,465
Quote:
Originally Posted by urmomma158 View Post
The russians managae to do it with the S300's. They can shoot and scoot in about 5 minutes.
Yeah, if they want to leave a bunch of crap behind, lol.

It would take longer than that just to disconnect the cables, lower the launcher and radar, get everything secured for travel, etc. I would imagine that there are ground jacks for stability, etc to get in place too.

This emphasis on how fast can they set up and break down is a way overblown imo. I'm sure it takes a lot longer to actually do in practice than is claimed in the brochures.
highsea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 18:35 PM   #13 (permalink)
urmomma158
the real plastic
Senior Contributor
 
urmomma158's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-05-06
Location: NJ Turnpike
Posts: 936
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by highsea View Post
Yeah, if they want to leave a bunch of crap behind, lol.

It would take longer than that just to disconnect the cables, lower the launcher and radar, get everything secured for travel, etc. I would imagine that there are ground jacks for stability, etc to get in place too.

This emphasis on how fast can they set up and break down is a way overblown imo. I'm sure it takes a lot longer to actually do in practice than is claimed in the brochures.
Guess you're right that's under optimal conditions. I think I'd give it about 15 minutes but that's just a guess. Their mobility is severly impaired if they have their radar masts deployed and without those their horizon is impaired.
urmomma158 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:46 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8