![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Contributor
|
Assault gun, any use today?
Just out of curiosity I was wondering if tanks like ww2 era Jagdpanther or the sturm series could be used today. Ofcourse you would have to build modern tank hull, optics and use modern weapons. An assault tank could mount a bigger gun than tanks with turret also they could have lower silhuette therefor making them good defensive units too.
What do you guys think? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
New Member
|
"But how about the A-10 gun I suggested way back?"
On an M-1 chassis with a high elevation turret and FLIR that would be a hell of a MOUT asset, as well as very good against helos and all but the most modern MBTs(and probably most of those too). I think a GAU-8/A equipped M-1 is a fantastic idea. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Senior Contributor
|
[I think a GAU-8/A equipped M-1 is a fantastic idea.[/quote]
Most flattered sir! Specifically, what I had in mind was just a cheap off-the-shelf turret replacement. Lighter, of course - in my mind this is no MBT replacement - as well as set far back and v. fast traversing. You're on the mark (can't ****in' resist can I?) when you state high angle. I'd ideally go for a two part elevation: normal -5 to +60 coupled with a hydraulic option to transfer the range +25 for urban. I would ideally envision the whole turret auto and opperated from within the hull. I have no bloody idea whether that is practical/practicable. Glad you like the concept tho! I can't see why it wouldn't be worth a few bucks to try? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Administrator
|
Quote:
As much as I would love to see a fine little darling like that in action, I have to wonder: Wouldnt such a vehicle need a very prodigous ammo capacity to be viable? I mean, can anybody guesstimate how much 30mm could an M-1 chassis carry?
__________________
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader. ~John Quincy Adams |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| F-22, stuff you should know | Rusky | Military Aviation | 275 | 09-21-2007 01:19 AM |
| A new, better U.N. | -{SpoonmaN}- | Political Discussions | 57 | 12-04-2006 19:57 PM |
| 2003 CONOPS chp 8-9 & appendix's | Defcon 6 | Naval Forces | 1 | 07-06-2006 22:38 PM |
| Brigadier, Maruf's new BdA-InA tirade at CDF | Officer of Engineers | The Field Mess | 34 | 08-24-2005 11:27 AM |