![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Regular
|
Russia VS. China
in a fight for siberia who would win? Russia or china? Id say China (considering mongolia is out of the way) because russian troops would simply too many enemy troops to shoot at before being able to re-arm reload regroup that sort of thing even with constant air support.
__________________
Dont change fact... Scincerely, Napoleon |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
New Member
|
I think history has shown sufficiently that an invasion of Russia is insanity....for anyone considering it.
The Chinese would fail just as the Nazis and the French did(back when the french weren't pussies). Just as the American/British/French expeditionary force did toward the tail end of WWI. China could no more invade Russia(successfully, then hold it) than they could invade manhattan. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Military Enthusiast
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Banished
|
Quote:
Siberia's winter is no much colder than Moscow where there was a big battle fought in winter during WWII. And Mongols proved that as well. Mongols fought at any time. They knew nothing except war, purely a military stock at that time. And Russian learned a lot from them during their slavery under Mongols. Last edited by cateyes : 07-01-2004 at 12:20 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Tamizhanban
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
Moscow and St Petersburg share similar summer temperatures, both averaging around 24°C. Moscow is frozen by the end of November, with snow remaining until early April, and has an average January temperature of around -12°C. Moscow is relatively warm when compared to northeastern town of Oymyakon, which just happens to be the coldest inhabited place on earth. Its winter temperatures drop to -65°C. -65 is way colder than -12. http://www.russiansabroad.com/russian_history_96.html http://www.lonelyplanet.com/destinat...nvironment.htm
__________________
A grain of wheat eclipsed the sun of Adam !! Last edited by Jay : 07-01-2004 at 14:08 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Banished
|
Quote:
These places are quite north and worthless to fight from military point of view. The real fight will happen along Russia/China/Mongonlia borders, which are pretty south. The Russia stronghold in Siberia is Irkutsk, which is not that cold. It will be the key place in a fight. Same thing happens to US. If Us invades Canada, they won't fight at North Pole, meaningless. Anyway, I won't think any war between Russia and China will happen, impossible. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Moderator
Scotch taster |
Quote:
__________________
Chimo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Defense Professional
|
Quote:
In general Russian army is in very bad shape. Only few divisions are operational and those are used in Caucasus, Tadjikistan and around Moscow. So if strategic nukes are disconsidered, Chinese have good pretty chance. The problem with Russia is that it has most of its millitary force concentrated in the European part and communications are too scarce and slow to bring enough force to the East. Just like during the times of Russian-Jappan war.... this is despite a recent maneurves when 800 troops were transported to Chinese border by plane with intention to prove Chinese that something can be deployed fast. So the only thing Russia can rely to disconsider Chinese threat is that nobody will start a full scale war with Russia which can wipe out any state using only few of its 18,000 nuclear warheads..... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Regular
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Military Enthusiast
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
Yes it is because of China's lack of long logistics capability. Remember the phrase, "Powerful arms but short legs". But remember that Russia only has two lines of logistics, the Trans Siberia Railroad and the harbors on the east of Russia on Pacific Ocean. I think China has the ability to interdict and disrupt those lines of communication and logistics. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Israel works on Iran N-strike | Ray | Political Discussions | 30 | 01-14-2007 15:54 PM |
| America's Pathetic Putin-Envy | VovaLee | Political Discussions | 44 | 12-19-2006 17:34 PM |
| India & China Thread | percentage_plyr | Political Discussions | 35 | 06-18-2006 17:12 PM |
| @ I don't think US should be the leader of the world.. | MIKEMUN | Political Discussions | 17 | 03-16-2005 01:41 AM |
| US's $5 billion nuclear gamble with China | Ray | The Western Alliance | 0 | 03-14-2005 04:53 AM |