ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Land Forces
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-12-2005, 07:03 AM   #121 (permalink)
agent09
Regular
 
Join Date: 03-12-05
Posts: 32
The Chinese Eat Rats

Subject: Chinese restaurant selling rat dishes despite health warnings

Rats to SARS, diners still lap it up
http://news.com.au/common/story_page...E13762,00.html
>From correspondents in Beijing
December 22, 2003

A RESTAURANT in southern China's Guangdong province is doing a brisk
business in rat dishes, ignoring warnings to stop serving wildlife to
prevent the spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome.

The eatery in the city of Zhuhai sells more than 100 rat dishes a day,
the state-run Information Times reported yesterday. Some of the rats are
caught on farms, while others are from the mountains.

Southern Chinese believe rodents are safe to eat or turn into wine if
caught wild in the countryside.

But regardless of whether the rodents are from rural or urban areas,
they can still transmit diseases, the report quoted experts as saying.

The outbreak of SARS in Guangdong last November did not discourage
locals from their eating habits.

Scientists from China and elsewhere found the SARS virus in several
types of wildlife, including rats, and the Government banned vendors
from selling wild animals.

Officials also tried to discourage people from eating such creatures,
but the practice, part of Guangdong culture, continues.

Rats served by the restaurant can be as big as 20cm long. The restaurant
skins the rodents by putting them in a pot of melted asphalt. Their skin
comes free when the cooled asphalt is peeled off.

Agence France-Presse

the wild, cruel beast is not behind the bars of the cage. he is in front of it - axel munthe

http://lists.envirolink.org/pipermai...22/013792.html
agent09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2005, 09:40 AM   #122 (permalink)
ajaybhutani
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 09-05-04
Posts: 2,100
Quote:
Originally Posted by agent09
The Chinese Eat Rats

Subject: Chinese restaurant selling rat dishes despite health warnings

Rats to SARS, diners still lap it up
http://news.com.au/common/story_page...E13762,00.html
>From correspondents in Beijing
December 22, 2003

A RESTAURANT in southern China's Guangdong province is doing a brisk
business in rat dishes, ignoring warnings to stop serving wildlife to
prevent the spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome.

The eatery in the city of Zhuhai sells more than 100 rat dishes a day,
the state-run Information Times reported yesterday. Some of the rats are
caught on farms, while others are from the mountains.

Southern Chinese believe rodents are safe to eat or turn into wine if
caught wild in the countryside.

But regardless of whether the rodents are from rural or urban areas,
they can still transmit diseases, the report quoted experts as saying.

The outbreak of SARS in Guangdong last November did not discourage
locals from their eating habits.

Scientists from China and elsewhere found the SARS virus in several
types of wildlife, including rats, and the Government banned vendors
from selling wild animals.

Officials also tried to discourage people from eating such creatures,
but the practice, part of Guangdong culture, continues.

Rats served by the restaurant can be as big as 20cm long. The restaurant
skins the rodents by putting them in a pot of melted asphalt. Their skin
comes free when the cooled asphalt is peeled off.

Agence France-Presse

the wild, cruel beast is not behind the bars of the cage. he is in front of it - axel munthe

http://lists.envirolink.org/pipermai...22/013792.html

Cant they ban the use of these animals in food. They are communists . even democracies can ban it . why not the communists. ?
ajaybhutani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2005, 18:51 PM   #123 (permalink)
Commando
Contributor
 
Join Date: 01-01-05
Posts: 412
Country:
I would pick 100 000 Russian troops would down the whole Chinese army without any other air interference.
Commando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2005, 20:41 PM   #124 (permalink)
agent09
Regular
 
Join Date: 03-12-05
Posts: 32
Inferior Chinese Forces are absolutely No Match from Superior Russian Forces and Thats the Truth
agent09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2005, 11:18 AM   #125 (permalink)
Garry
Defense Professional
 
Join Date: 06-18-04
Posts: 1,528
Quote:
Originally Posted by Commando
I would pick 100 000 Russian troops would down the whole Chinese army without any other air interference.
I wouldn't be so sure. In my non-prefessional view there are few divisions in Russian army which are capable to meet high challenges but rest are very inaddequate. The best officers have left army in last 12 years, while tallented young people have considered army the least attractive place in 90-es and early 2000-es. This led to high losses in Chechnya... Among those best divisions are Pskov Paratrooper Division, 201 infantry and Ryazan Paratrooper Divsiion. In general it would make less than 100,000 soldiers.

In addition to that Russia will have problems with bringing enough forces and supplies to Amur region (Chinese border) fast enough - there are two railroads and both go along Chinese border. When required Chinese army will cut them first. On other side Chinese supply lines would be much shorter.

Air superiority might be problem as well - too few strips in the area and too few fighters are based there, while China has good part of its AF close to border with North Korea.

And the last but not least is issue of numbers - China may easily outnumber Russian troops in the area.

So nukes is the only hope that they would never try any Blitzkrieg...
Garry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2005, 19:35 PM   #126 (permalink)
agent09
Regular
 
Join Date: 03-12-05
Posts: 32
No. Russia had been a SuperPower. China did not. That simply means that Russia is still not intact or Stabilized now a days thats why they are still on a unstable situation right now. What they need right now is a leader like Josef Stalin. Who cares for all the lives that he'd wasted? Atleast he created Russia as a SuperPower and thats what is important. Power!
agent09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2005, 01:39 AM   #127 (permalink)
MIKEMUN
Contributor
 
Join Date: 01-13-05
Posts: 467
Quote:
Originally Posted by agent09
No. Russia had been a SuperPower. China did not. That simply means that Russia is still not intact or Stabilized now a days thats why they are still on a unstable situation right now. What they need right now is a leader like Josef Stalin. Who cares for all the lives that he'd wasted? Atleast he created Russia as a SuperPower and thats what is important. Power!


Brother,you are heading for a banning. Tone down.......
__________________
"They want to test our feelings.They want to know whether Muslims are extremists or not. Death to them and their newspapers."

Protester
MIKEMUN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2005, 23:49 PM   #128 (permalink)
lwarmonger
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 02-08-05
Posts: 1,784
Quote:
Originally Posted by agent09
No. Russia had been a SuperPower. China did not. That simply means that Russia is still not intact or Stabilized now a days thats why they are still on a unstable situation right now. What they need right now is a leader like Josef Stalin. Who cares for all the lives that he'd wasted? Atleast he created Russia as a SuperPower and thats what is important. Power!
Morality aside, Josef Stalin may have helped Russia become a great power in the short run, but over the long term his policies were what caused the collapse of the Soviet system. A system which is reliant upon fear to survive can only survive as long as those in charge maintain the will and the strength to cause that fear. Stalin was about as terrifying as a person could be, and there has never been a Russian leader to match him in terms of personality. The problem is that his successors were incapable (just as a new Josef Stalin's successors would be incapable) of matching his ruthlessness and cruelty due to the fact that all the others who were died at the hands of the NKVD. After that, it was simply a matter of time before the traditional fear wore away, and the system collapsed. A system based upon fear is never permanent, and quite incapable of adapting itself to meet changing situations.... and is therefore ultimately doomed.
lwarmonger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2005, 23:56 PM   #129 (permalink)
lwarmonger
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 02-08-05
Posts: 1,784
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garry
I wouldn't be so sure. In my non-prefessional view there are few divisions in Russian army which are capable to meet high challenges but rest are very inaddequate. The best officers have left army in last 12 years, while tallented young people have considered army the least attractive place in 90-es and early 2000-es. This led to high losses in Chechnya... Among those best divisions are Pskov Paratrooper Division, 201 infantry and Ryazan Paratrooper Divsiion. In general it would make less than 100,000 soldiers.

In addition to that Russia will have problems with bringing enough forces and supplies to Amur region (Chinese border) fast enough - there are two railroads and both go along Chinese border. When required Chinese army will cut them first. On other side Chinese supply lines would be much shorter.

Air superiority might be problem as well - too few strips in the area and too few fighters are based there, while China has good part of its AF close to border with North Korea.

And the last but not least is issue of numbers - China may easily outnumber Russian troops in the area.

So nukes is the only hope that they would never try any Blitzkrieg...
Agreed. The biggest difficulty would be cutting the raillines before mobilization, to try and prevent additional Russian forces from making it in theater. Also, a clear strategic direction is necessary, otherwise China will just end up flailing about inside Siberia. I have no doubt that Russia's troops are superior to that of China (and they have 6 category A formations along the Siberian border), but if the Chinese play their cards right, they could take much of Siberia away from Russia. Assuming no nukes.

Because Russia has nukes, China would be obliterated very quickly, and it's ground forces would grind to a halt as they run out of supplies.
lwarmonger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2005, 21:11 PM   #130 (permalink)
beantown05
New Member
 
Join Date: 03-16-05
Location: bean town
Posts: 8
RUSSIA VS. CHINA WILL NEVER HAPPEN! MORE LIKE RUSSIA,CHINA,NORTH KOREA,(MYBE)IRAN VS. USA,UK,JAPAN,S KOREA ,Taiwan

let wwIII begin!
beantown05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2005, 23:51 PM   #131 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 15,915
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garry
The best officers have left army in last 12 years, while tallented young people have considered army the least attractive place in 90-es and early 2000-es.
That's exactly the difference. The Russians have far more superior officer staff than the Chinese.
__________________
Chimo
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2007, 17:11 PM   #132 (permalink)
Woodsy the Lar
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 02-27-07
Location: Germany
Posts: 39
Country:
Absence

Ive been reading this thread for a while now and no-one has mentioned that the Russian officers corps are not at the standard of the cold war,the standard of the purges would be more right. The other problem is 88% of the Russian ground force,basically everything not in TCHECHEN is waiting for spare parts.

If China goes north in summer it would im absolutly sure reach Siberia, holding it is another matter.

Last edited by Woodsy the Lar : 04-27-2007 at 17:29 PM.
Woodsy the Lar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2007, 07:29 AM   #133 (permalink)
Garry
Defense Professional
 
Join Date: 06-18-04
Posts: 1,528
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woodsy the Lar View Post
Ive been reading this thread for a while now and no-one has mentioned that the Russian officers corps are not at the standard of the cold war,the standard of the purges would be more right. The other problem is 88% of the Russian ground force,basically everything not in TCHECHEN is waiting for spare parts.

If China goes north in summer it would im absolutly sure reach Siberia, holding it is another matter.
I actually had your oppinion before. Now after I have studied the question more in detail I realized that China has VERY little chance invade... it may attack and fall back. But invading would be problem.

Russia still keeps quite a force in far east... look at number of artillery/MLRS it has there.... add strong air force... Its FIREPOWER exceeds anything China can put against them in that region.

Moreover, Russians will always know if China wants to do invasion YEAR before anything happens. Without occupying Mongolia there is only one way to attack Russia - in eastern part of the boarder (which is but in two by Mongolia).

that is list of forces in Siberian millitary district while Far Eastern exceeds it....

Siberian Military District - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Quote:
District Forces Today
The 41st Army was formed from the headquarters of the former Siberian Military District at Novosibirsk while the new district’s headquarters were established at Chita (the former Trans-baikal HQ). It is likely safe to assume that the 41st Army controls all the field formations of the previous Siberian Military District, while the 36th Army, at Borzya, and the 29th Army, recently upgraded from the former 57th Army Corps at Ulan-Ude, control the forces in the former Trans-baikal District.

The IISS lists the district as having a total of one tank, two motor-rifle and one machine-gun artillery divisions, two motor-rifle and one air assault brigades. The 2nd Tank Division, previously active in the District having moved from the Leningrad Military District in the 1960s, disbanded in 2001-3. Also, while the 21st Guards 'Tagenrog' Motor Rifle Division, withdrawn from Germany to the former Siberian Military District, was apparently partially re-equipped with the T-90 MBT in the mid 1990s, in 2000 it was apparently disbanded.

Cossack Separate Motor Rifle Regiment, Borzya
29th Army, Ulan-Ude
5th Guards Tank Division
245 Motor Rifle Division
11 Air Assault Brigade
36th Army, Borzya
131st Motor Rifle Division, Sretensk
41st Army, Novosibirsk
85th Motor Rifle Division
74th Motor Rifle Brigade, Yurga(Constant readiness
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Russia_Federation(in_layers).pdf (425.1 KB, 3 views)
Garry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2007, 16:37 PM   #134 (permalink)
Woodsy the Lar
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 02-27-07
Location: Germany
Posts: 39
Country:
Thanks for the Information Garry! My main concern is that for all the manpower the Russian army has it still has problems in Tchetchnea.The problem on the Chinease side is of coarse Oil!
Woodsy the Lar is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Israel works on Iran N-strike Ray Political Discussions 30 01-14-2007 15:54 PM
America's Pathetic Putin-Envy VovaLee Political Discussions 44 12-19-2006 17:34 PM
India & China Thread percentage_plyr Political Discussions 35 06-18-2006 17:12 PM
@ I don't think US should be the leader of the world.. MIKEMUN Political Discussions 17 03-16-2005 01:41 AM
US's $5 billion nuclear gamble with China Ray The Western Alliance 0 03-14-2005 04:53 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:56 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8