ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Land Forces
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
View Poll Results: which is the best tank?
M1A2 Abrams 111 52.36%
Challenger II 53 25.00%
T-80 48 22.64%
Voters: 212. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-21-2004, 10:49 AM   #1 (permalink)
tomas
Patron
 
Join Date: 12-15-03
Location: Area 51
Posts: 182
Which is the best tank?

which is the best out of these. in my opinion and mine means most since i started this thread it is the far superior challenger II.

:D :D :sniper :taynk :taynk :taynk
__________________
two wrongs dont make a right but three wrongs do. ;D

join my games site
fragsgames.forumer.com
tomas is offline  
Old 01-21-2004, 11:03 AM   #2 (permalink)
bigross86
401 Ikvot Habarzel
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 08-07-03
Location: Ra'anana, Israel
Posts: 3,148
Send a message via ICQ to bigross86 Send a message via AIM to bigross86 Send a message via Yahoo to bigross86
A- Your opinion isn't the most important, everyone's opinion is equal. Second, I'd have to say its the Merkava Mk IV
__________________
You're a naughty girl, go to my room!
bigross86 is offline  
Old 01-21-2004, 11:06 AM   #3 (permalink)
tomas
Patron
 
Join Date: 12-15-03
Location: Area 51
Posts: 182
i was being sarcastic dude
:D :D :sniper :taynk

ps nice to see you again

frag
tomas is offline  
Old 01-21-2004, 19:16 PM   #4 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,869
Country:
Heh, Abrams, battle tested to the bone.
Ironduke is online now  
Old 01-22-2004, 06:27 AM   #5 (permalink)
tomas
Patron
 
Join Date: 12-15-03
Location: Area 51
Posts: 182
i would say you guys are nutts voting for the abrams but you guys are american so you would vote form your tank
tomas is offline  
Old 01-22-2004, 10:02 AM   #6 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,869
Country:
I would go with what has been proven in battle.
Ironduke is online now  
Old 01-22-2004, 10:24 AM   #7 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 16,673
Country:
The Challenger was in the Kuwait and Iraq Wars also.
__________________
Chimo
Officer of Engineers is offline  
Old 01-22-2004, 10:33 AM   #8 (permalink)
tomas
Patron
 
Join Date: 12-15-03
Location: Area 51
Posts: 182
thank you very much so it has been proven too. and it is almost same specs as far as i know.

:D :D :sniper :taynk
tomas is offline  
Old 01-22-2004, 11:40 AM   #9 (permalink)
bigross86
401 Ikvot Habarzel
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 08-07-03
Location: Ra'anana, Israel
Posts: 3,148
Send a message via ICQ to bigross86 Send a message via AIM to bigross86 Send a message via Yahoo to bigross86
Merkava Mk I, Mk II and Mk III have all ben proven in battle. No reason why the Mk IV shouldn't be as good as the others, for tankers as well as infantry due to the compartment in the back for foot soldiers
bigross86 is offline  
Old 01-22-2004, 15:17 PM   #10 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
The best tank is a dead tank.
Anon is offline  
Old 01-22-2004, 15:47 PM   #11 (permalink)
bigross86
401 Ikvot Habarzel
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 08-07-03
Location: Ra'anana, Israel
Posts: 3,148
Send a message via ICQ to bigross86 Send a message via AIM to bigross86 Send a message via Yahoo to bigross86
Says the Tank-phobic sniper...
bigross86 is offline  
Old 01-22-2004, 22:24 PM   #12 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,869
Country:
Quote:
Originally posted by tomas
i would say you guys are nutts voting for the abrams but you guys are american so you would vote form your tank
What tank has outperformed the Abrams in combat?
Ironduke is online now  
Old 01-23-2004, 15:51 PM   #13 (permalink)
axl
Patron
 
Join Date: 09-18-03
Posts: 242
try it the other way round: what tank got outperformed by the later abrams versions? let me think...wasn't it crappy t-72 versions which were 20 years older from a technical point of view, not really in a good shape and with horribly trained crews? your combat prooven means nothing.

and also one comment for the topic starter: there are nearly 15 years of development between chal2/m1a2 and t-80. so what you wanna prove? maybe that the the tommies and yanks needed quite some time to bring hunter/killer capabilities to the own tanks? yes, soviet tanks have that since the early 1980s.

regards
axl

www.kampfpanzer.de
axl is offline  
Old 01-23-2004, 16:26 PM   #14 (permalink)
Praxus
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-26-03
Posts: 3,237
From a technicle Standpoint the Leopard 2A6 is a better tank, however Abrams crews no matter how much you want to belittle this fact, has had MUCH more experiance then most other western armies(excluding GB).

You obviously have NEVER had any experiance with Tanks, no matter how much you want to pretend you can not change the facts.
Praxus is offline  
Old 01-24-2004, 10:41 AM   #15 (permalink)
Sparky
Regular
 
Join Date: 09-12-03
Location: Illinois USA
Posts: 50
The ABRAMS is at the top or so close to it that ithe difference dosen't amount to anything. Understand that with the US military budget and US technology and the frequency of its likely use if the US main battle tank wasn't up to the job then it would be modified or replaced in short order. "Not good enough" wouldn't go over well in the US and it wouldn't stay that way very long if US tanker started dyng because their tanks weren't as good as opposing tanks. Unlike some other countries we critique ourselves rather nastily when it comes to military effectiveness, especially if it will mean more funding for something better. The manufactureres are just waiting for and excuse/justification for building it.
Sparky is offline  
Closed Thread




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Greatest Ever Military Tanks vinay60000 Land Forces 111 06-20-2006 14:12 PM
Tank ex India's new main battle tank (MBT)??? vinay60000 South Asian Defense Topics 78 06-05-2006 10:58 AM
T-55 VS M48 Patton RepublicanGuard Land Forces 23 05-12-2006 15:24 PM
US Armor - A Russian Point of View Shek Land Forces 7 04-25-2005 17:50 PM
US Tankers wishlist for upgrades to Abrams Anon Land Forces 7 03-30-2005 19:47 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:55 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8