![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Military Professional
|
U.S Army Readiness Wearing Thin
I've noticed this is starting to make headlines more often. I first read about it maybe 3-4 months ago but it seems to be getting into the headlines alot now and becoming more urgent.
Given the current U.S commitments abroad currently the U.S Army appears to be stretched too thin. Reported readiness rates for active duty army units are declining and are now reaching a point where unless significant changes are made the current deployment rates will reach unsustainable levels. Using more Reserves and National Guard could offset the shortfall somewhat but its apparent that unless there is a significant increase in funding to the Army, particularly to deal with equipment shortfalls the Army will begin to experence major gaps in readiness and equipment availability for active operations. How long can the Army keep this up without major changes? --- Some quotes (I'll post the links at the bottom): "The likelihood that many Army combat and support units scheduled to deploy to Iraq in 2007 will have less than the required one year period for rest and re-training. This is one of the key indicators that lead many Army officials to conclude that current deployment rates cannot be sustained without breaking the force." "The lowest readiness levels for the vast majority of non-deployed active-duty combat units. The situation for the Army Guard and Reserves is worse." "Thousands of key Army weapons platforms – such as tanks, Humvees, Bradley Fighting Vehicles – sitting in disuse at Army maintenance depots for lack of funding." "In fact it’s quite likely that Army combat units preparing for the next rotation (07-09) will be “short-cycled”; that is, units will be forced to return to battle with less than one year’s time to recuperate, reset, and train. For example, the 3rd brigade of the 3rd Infantry Division returned from Iraq in February of this year. Prior to the last deployment it had a 16-month preparation period. The brigade now expects to receive its “prepare to deploy” orders within roughly the next 3 months, which would force the brigade to curtail training and eliminate leave for its soldiers." "The situation for the Army’s combat support and combat service support units (CS/CSS), such as military police and civil affairs, is worse. Manned mostly by the Guard and Reserve, the Army has been forced to cobble together CS/CSS units in order to meet theater deployment requirements. Since January of 2005, roughly three-quarters of all CS/CSS units deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan were augmented with Army personnel pulled from other units, personnel trained for other jobs, personnel from other military services or, increasingly, private contractors." "Of particular concern is the readiness rates of the units scheduled to deploy later this year, particularly the 1st Cavalry Division. This division and its 4 brigades will deploy to Iraq in October at the lowest level of readiness because of equipment shortfalls. To meet its needs, this unit – like virtually all other units that have recently deployed or will soon deploy to Iraq – must fall-in on equipment in theater. Operating unfamiliar, battle weary equipment increases the potential for casualties and accidents." "Funding shortfalls have created backlogs at all of the Army’s key depot maintenance facilities. At Anniston Army Depot in Alabama, some 600 M1 tanks sit in disuse. At Red River Army Depot in Texas, 700 Bradley Fighting Vehicles and over 450 trucks have not been serviced. Roughly 2,600 Humvees are sitting idle at various Army depots. Tens of thousands of small arms, communications sets, and other key items have been similarly backlogged." --- http://www.slate.com/id/2149684/fr/rss/ http://www.democraticleader.house.go...lReadiness.pdf http://www.defensetech.org/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Military Professional
|
I agree with alot of what is said about rapid redeployments wearing on units very quickly....
No longer uptodate with any army units so can't comment based on personal statements about actual readiness..... I do have to say that if I was a unit commander I'd be sure that my units readiness reports were all stamped with a nifty red confidential stamp so that they wouldn't make headlines and end up in the hands of those who would want to hit the units least ready for casualty purposes. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NATO vs. Warsaw Pact | Metak | Warfare in the Modern Age | 348 | 08-22-2008 04:21 AM |
| Red Storm Rising - Tom Clancy | Amaterasu | Warfare in the Modern Age | 67 | 03-27-2008 10:17 AM |
| Do G4 have a case. | crooks | Political Discussions | 165 | 12-31-2006 06:58 AM |
| Articles and links for the Military Professional | Officer of Engineers | The Staff College | 115 | 11-20-2006 11:28 AM |