ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Land Forces
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-09-2006, 15:09 PM   #16 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalem
I know the M2 .50cal has penetration far in excess of rifle caliber MGs, but is its suppression value less because of its slower ROF, or is that irrelevant?

-dale
The M-2 suffers from a relatively low ROF, but it does have tremendous penetration, making above ground cover tenuous at best for enemy personnel.

The M-2 is a pretty good suppression weapon, but a M134 or Vulcan has no equal.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2006, 16:11 PM   #17 (permalink)
leib10
HKHolic
Senior Contributor
 
leib10's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-17-05
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 3,256
Country:
Problem with Vulcan weapons is that they have to have an external power source to operate.
__________________
"The right man in the wrong place can make all the difference in the world. So wake up, Mr. Freeman. Wake up and smell the ashes." G-Man
leib10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2006, 16:30 PM   #18 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by leibstandarte10
Problem with Vulcan weapons is that they have to have an external power source to operate.
That's what god invented the armored personnel carrier for. Let's face it, the VAST majority of heavy MG's are vehicle mounted.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2006, 19:35 PM   #19 (permalink)
leib10
HKHolic
Senior Contributor
 
leib10's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-17-05
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 3,256
Country:
Which generally precludes them from being used by infantry except, as you said, while they're mounted in vehicles or mounted in a static position. Unless they want to carry around batteries for the gun as well as a ridiculous amount of ammunition and the gun itself.
leib10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2006, 00:10 AM   #20 (permalink)
lemontree
Bandaid
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 10-04-04
Location: India
Posts: 5,928
The funny thing about Russian and US made gattling MGs like the M134 and Vulcan is that the US gattlings are electical operated while the russians ones are gas operated. Why the difference in operating systems?
__________________

Cheers!...on the rocks!!
lemontree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2006, 02:34 AM   #21 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by lemontree
The funny thing about Russian and US made gattling MGs like the M134 and Vulcan is that the US gattlings are electical operated while the russians ones are gas operated. Why the difference in operating systems?
US rotary cannons and mini-guns can also operate hydraulically. Gas op is nice in that it can operate without external power, but it also leads to a lot more weapon heating, fouling, and i would imagine, also restricts the absolute ROF as well. Gas op is probably heavier too.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2006, 03:05 AM   #22 (permalink)
lemontree
Bandaid
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 10-04-04
Location: India
Posts: 5,928
Quote:
Originally Posted by M21Sniper
US rotary cannons and mini-guns can also operate hydraulically. Gas op is nice in that it can operate without external power, but it also leads to a lot more weapon heating, fouling, and i would imagine, also restricts the absolute ROF as well. Gas op is probably heavier too.
Bill,
The comparison chart can be found in this Link, and the gas operated MGs < 12.7mm appear to be lighter than electrically operated ones.
lemontree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2006, 03:44 AM   #23 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by lemontree
Bill,
The comparison chart can be found in this Link, and the gas operated MGs < 12.7mm appear to be lighter than electrically operated ones.
Yep, some of them appear lighter, though the US 7.62mm weapon is lighter than the Russian gas pwd version.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dash To Baghdad Left Top U.S. Generals Divided Shek The War in Iraq 0 03-13-2006 11:40 AM
The Strange Case of Mr. Hyde and Dr. Jekyll: General Pervez Musharraf indianguy4u South Asian Defense Topics 0 08-29-2005 04:18 AM
Brigadier, Maruf's new BdA-InA tirade at CDF Officer of Engineers The Field Mess 34 08-24-2005 11:27 AM
Plight of Nagalim - A country brutally occupied & oppressed by the Indians Sher-e-Punjab South Asian Defense Topics 57 08-14-2005 06:03 AM
Defence Day of Pakistan - 6th September Asim Aquil South Asian Defense Topics 9 10-06-2004 03:36 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:57 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8