Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!
The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
|
 |
03-14-2006, 12:00 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Regular
|
Light Cavalry in Modern Context
I've been thinking for quite some time the role of light cavalry in modern battlefeild. I mean the light tanks with crew of two made of composite material equipped mainly with a heavy machine gun, mortar, and ATGM, no big main gun. I have been thinking it can be exellent in the role of supporting MBT's and filling the role of between MBT's and APC's or dismounted infantry.
The one reason is that it will be Light, so for silent recon mission before the tanks or mainly supporing or say augmenting the utility of MBT perticulerly in being able to carry ammo for MBT's and having short range indirect fire capability. When used in this role it would be cheap too for the mass production since the number of euipment one can get the cost of an MBT will be more than 4 but I don't know much....is there someone who can help? I think it might also reduce the burden on logistics compared to utility one can get out. Of course! having an MBT for a light tank would only be better but I'm talking in terms of maximizing overall utility for a fixed amount of resources.
Or is the idea has been considered an discarded in modern context?
|
|
|
03-14-2006, 12:07 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Military Professional Moderator Scotch taster
Join Date: 08-06-03
Country:
|
What's the difference now with Armoured HUMVEEs assigned to the Air Assualt divisions?
__________________
Chimo
|
|
|
03-14-2006, 12:18 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Regular
|
I'm not sure sir!
I was thinking of this doing the role of tank support vehicle as well while running with the tanks and thought of it being tracked. And used more in exploitation and pursuit phase rather than assault phase, massed in numbers like in independent cavalry operation. Are HUMVEE's able to cruise all the terrain a tank can?
|
|
|
03-14-2006, 14:11 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
New Member
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers
What's the difference now with Armoured HUMVEEs assigned to the Air Assualt divisions?
|
The difference is they have HUMVEEs and not two man light tanks!
Sorry sir, i couldn't resist... 
|
|
|
03-14-2006, 23:43 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Death, the Destroyer of Worlds...
Senior Contributor
Join Date: 09-08-04
Location: The badlands of West London.
Country:
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers
What's the difference now with Armoured HUMVEEs assigned to the Air Assualt divisions?
|
How durable are those vehicles? I'm aware that unarmoured HUMVEEs have had a hard time in Iraq, how much safer are troops in armoured models?
|
|
|
03-15-2006, 12:04 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Regular
|
Sir,
Just one more thing on HUMMVEEs, I was talking in the context of third world army like that of India that still follows Strike Corps Doctrine.
|
|
|
03-15-2006, 12:05 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Contributor
Join Date: 08-15-05
Location: Oak Hill, VA
|
The USMC LAR battalions can also be considered a form of light cav. (As can, to a lesser extent, the RSTA squadron in Stryker brigades)
They seemed to do pretty well in OIF.
Last edited by B.Smitty : 03-15-2006 at 12:07 PM.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:28 AM.
|
|