ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > International Strategic Affairs > Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 05-01-2007, 00:48 AM   #16 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 15,688
Country:
Please post the links. I will be very interested.

As for your service, I was trying to figure out the timing. You could not have possibly have enough time to rejoin your battalion from the US ... unless you were in Israel at the time.
__________________
Chimo
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2007, 00:50 AM   #17 (permalink)
Ray
Postmaster General
Military Professional
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 25,850
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Druze View Post
Most IDF companies sat on the border waiting for the full advance into Lebanon for days, then they'd finally get their orders only to have them rescinded minutes before deploying. This indescision and back and forth lasted until the last 48 hours till Israel made a smalll symbolic push to the Litani with a very limited amount of soldiers.

When I came across the border back into Israel after the war I was deeply suprised that many full regiments never went in and spent the whole war pretty much throwing pebbles at one another and didn't even cross north.

The political leadership and its Air Force oriented Chief of Staff made horrible mistakes.

Rather then awe Lebanon with immediate airstrikes on their National airport, bridges, and power facilities, an immediate force could have pushed straight to the Litani and clean up crews could have followed immediately to locate tunnels, weapons caches, and secure the area which would have stopped nearly all of the rocket attacks on Israel. But Top command decided they could stop the rockets from the air instead of from the ground so Hezbollah was able to launch their crude rockets up until the third to last day of the war. Big mistake.

The fact that IDF soldiers deep behind enemy lines had to actually hydrate themselves by taking water canteens from Dead Hezbollah fighters shows clearly that the top commanders knew all along the political leadership was not willing and did not plan for a full scale assault. It was also a source of humour among many soldiers returning with Hezbollah flags and jokingly saying that if it hadn't been for those twenty Hezbollah fighters that they got into a firefight with they would have died of thirst!!!!

I have some video from my unit as we crossed back that I am still trying to get back from military censors. It is pretty much a twenty minute collage of clips of joke on the government, some very funny such as one commander saying that if Ariel Sharon had woken up today and saw how Olmert had handled the war he'd force his doctor to re-induce his coma at gunpoint. Because mention was made in the video of the tunnel system my battalion discovered those bastards took my memory card away and I'm still waiting to get it back.
Druze,

All wars lost or stalled is always blamed on the politicians and lack of will and indecision. It is nothing that is new.

The political leadership gives the National Intent to the Commander in Chief (CinC) and he is to translate the political intent to the military intent. In the event, the political intent cannot be converted into the military intent, the CinC has to state so and if still forced then he either resigns or modifies the war plan to achieve as much as possible. Now, if this, which is followed universally, is what is done in Israel, don't you think that it is the fault also of the military, even if the political leadership was inept?

Indecision in the battlefield is not the fault of the politician. The battefield is the sole preserve of the military. There is nothing called symbolism in battle. Nor can anyone but the military commanders be blamed for embarking on mission with 'limited amount of troops'. The troops to task is the prerogative of the commander and not politicians. I am saddened and shocked since this does speak negatively of the casual attitude displayed and the cavalier execution. Could it be overconfidence at play to only discover it is that it was misplaced?

If the troops were throwing pebbles and not enjoining in battle even when the situation was nearly turning into a crisis, it is indeed a extraordinary commentary about the professionalism displayed at all levels. It borders on the ridiculous not to use combat ready units when a crisis has developed. Compare this with the Suez Crossing of Sharon during 1967. I am sure there would have been good reasons for troops throwing pebbles and not being employed and which has not been placed on the public forum.

Likewise, it is not the politicians who dictate how much of water is to be taken on a mission. The illustration that Israeli soldiers on a mission had to take water off the Hezb dead does speak of the lacklustre attitude towards planning of a mission and ineptness of the military commanders at the unit and formation level. It does give a poor impression of the professionalism that is current and that there has been a degradation from the past.

I have read on this forum about how the Hezbs used the A Tk msls against IDF and also the way the Hezb were painted as they were some bogeymen.

It is deeply disturbing a thought that Israel could be halted by a rag tag lot.

I am sure that in Israel there is some real serious discussions taking place and errors being rectified so that the next time, it is back to business as it was before the Lebanon phase of IDF's history.

It is not the time to find scapegoats and fall guys or find excuses for what appears to be a real botched up affair and instead do some real honest heart searching!
__________________


"Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

HAKUNA MATATA

Last edited by Ray : 05-01-2007 at 00:55 AM.
Ray is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2007, 03:09 AM   #18 (permalink)
Druze
Regular
 
Druze's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-23-07
Posts: 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
Please post the links. I will be very interested.

As for your service, I was trying to figure out the timing. You could not have possibly have enough time to rejoin your battalion from the US ... unless you were in Israel at the time.
I spend my summers in Israel. I work for a family owned aerospace firm here in Los Angeles that specializes in custom pins and sockets for connectors. Our vendors are mostly in Switzerland and France, and I try to call on our customers in Israel every summer while I visit my family and in addition to summer I usually make a winter call as well. We sell to Rafael, IAI, and Elbit with Elbit being our most valuable customer. So I take my two weeks in Israel for vacation during the summer and add an extra week calling on customers.
however even if I am a reservist in Israel at a time of war, I have no right to join my unit by law if I did not do my yearly reserve call up time which every reservist must do to familarize oneself with new equipment, tactics, and conditioning. During Winter Break I do one week of Reservist training with my battalion. I do my 1 week per year more to catch up with my old squaddies then to run around in the mud or man a checkpoint for a few days.
I don't know how it is here in the States, but in Israel the soldiers you serve with during your 3 years of active duty (ages 18-21) are the reservists you will spend the rest of your army life with for 1 week to 1 month a year until you are 45. But since Herev is a well respected Unit most soldiers go on to very established military careers in the IDF. Its a very close bond you develop with these men and living in the US I don't get to stay in touch my old friends as much as I'd like to so I make time to do my minimum reserve time every year.

Even though I was in Israel at the time of the outbreak of the war, had I not done my reserve training that year I would not have been allowed to join my battalion.

Many of Israel's elite forces suffered heavy casualties during the war and even Israel's Sayeret force suffered some casualties as well.

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...291414,00.html

All-Druse unit returns without single casualty | Jerusalem Post

Best Battalion Award for 2001 Goes To Druze Volunteers

Last edited by Druze : 05-01-2007 at 03:14 AM.
Druze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2007, 07:46 AM   #19 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 15,688
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Druze View Post
I don't know how it is here in the States, but in Israel the soldiers you serve with during your 3 years of active duty (ages 18-21) are the reservists you will spend the rest of your army life with for 1 week to 1 month a year until you are 45.
When I was in, the Canadian Forces Reserves requires 52 Parade Days a year with an additional 60 day training before deployment.
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2007, 16:27 PM   #20 (permalink)
S-2
Military Professional
 
S-2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-11-06
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 2,057
Country:
Druze Reply

Your comments were very welcome. Thank you. The young Israeli tanker that I earlier mentioned talked about their battalion being used to run water into rifle platoons that had exhausted themselves.

I'm not prepared to toss the IDF's professionalism from top to bottom under the bus. Mistakes appear to have been made at each level, but it is hardly an indictment of the entire force. It was, though, an unmistakable "shot across the bow" to the IDF, particularly the shoddy preparation that many of the reservists seemed to imply with funding shortages for training, diversion of training time to operational demands in Gaza, and equipment shortages on call-up.

We'll see how matters progress in the next go-around. Druze, I'd love to ask you more but it appears that you may be a tad close to the operational after-action reviews...We'll keep it that way, eh?

OoE,

Sir, thank you for the great links. I knew that you'd have a few tucked away!
__________________
"This aggression will not stand, man!" Jeff Lebowski
S-2 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2007, 17:53 PM   #21 (permalink)
Ray
Postmaster General
Military Professional
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 25,850
Country:
S 2,

I think you are mistaking my critique for a J'Acuse.

However, compare the Lebanon episode with the Yom Kippur War.

In the Lebanon episode, the Israelis had the initiative, were opposed by only ragamuffins and NOT by Arab armies en mass. In the Yom Kippur War, the Israelis faced the Arab conventional armies in all its might and were totally surprised, with more than half their forces away from the units and at home!


And yet, they not only snatched the initiative back, but gave the Arabs the hiding of their lives.


Just to recapitulate the Yom Kippur War. In the early days of the war, the IDF suffered heavy losses as Egyptian forces crossed the Suez Canal and overran Israeli strongholds, while Syrians marched deep into the Golan Heights. Israel launched its counteroffensive first against the Syrian front, and only when it had pushed the Syrians back well east of the 1967 cease-fire line (by October 15) did Israel turn its attention to the Egyptian front. In ten days of fighting, Israel pushed the Egyptian army back across the canal, and the IDF made deep incursions into Egypt. On October 24, with Israeli soldiers about one kilometer from the main Cairo-Ismailia highway and the Soviet Union threatening direct military intervention, the UN imposed a cease-fire.

Much that my earlier post does appear a bit rough, but I prefer a pragmatic analysis to one which tends to nibble around the periphery or which obfuscates the reality.

Most of the after action reports are not available in the open forum and to that extent I am handicapped, but prima facie, the Lebanon war has badly tarnished the image and is a little short of being a fiasco. It is unbelievable that the redoubtable IDF can be halted by rag tag tuchkus. I still can't believe it!

Much that I find the IDF formidable and am enthralled by some of their campaigns, you will agree that one should not cloud one's critique because of extraneous reasons. Don't you think that one rather face the unpleasant truth and prepare, than perish because one is afraid to face the truth?!

The Israelis are already finding out what went wrong and will surely come out better the next round.

Quote:
...........their battalion being used to run water into rifle platoons that had exhausted themselves.
Honestly, I find this unbelievable and unusual way to conduct a war! Very unusual.

The Indian Army has gone in deep into the desert and into enemy territory in the wars they have conducted and never faced such poor planning in logistics. Interestingly, we do not take water from enemy sources or their dead since there is a good possibility that the water is poisoned since water is a precious commodity in the deserts and poisoning it is the best way to slow down the advancing columns.

Also, it is a rare thing if any army has fought wars at full strength and with full equipment as per the TOE or WET (as we call it).

Last edited by Ray : 05-01-2007 at 18:20 PM.
Ray is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2007, 18:27 PM   #22 (permalink)
S-2
Military Professional
 
S-2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-11-06
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 2,057
Country:
Ray Reply

Brigadier,

"I think you are mistaking my critique for a J'Acuse."

Not at all, sir. Your points are well-taken, if "...a bit rough...".

Still, as you and I have both mentioned, the AARs are what really matter. External analysis by CSIS, Parameters, or the Washington Institute For Near-East Policy will simply have to suffice while the lessons-learned at the operational and tactical level are so relevant and sensitive.
S-2 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2007, 20:56 PM   #23 (permalink)
Druze
Regular
 
Druze's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-23-07
Posts: 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by S-2 View Post
Brigadier,

"I think you are mistaking my critique for a J'Acuse."

Not at all, sir. Your points are well-taken, if "...a bit rough...".

Still, as you and I have both mentioned, the AARs are what really matter. External analysis by CSIS, Parameters, or the Washington Institute For Near-East Policy will simply have to suffice while the lessons-learned at the operational and tactical level are so relevant and sensitive.

Israel had established itself as one of the best logistical supply armies in its previous wars. For such a small country to take over so much territory in such a short time it needs a flawless ferrying of supplies so as not to impede advance. the fact that supplies were short in the Lebanon war shows that the ground units places insides Lebanon were merely symbolic and small. Engineer and supply units were not deployed correctly and when they were deployed they were lacking in numbers. battalions like mine don't use regular supplies as we are essentially on our own once behind enemy lines and we are very adept at gathering our own supplies.

But you know what? Israel is lucky that this wasn't a major war, and Israel is also lucky to be sometimes to open a democracy in its post-war inquiry's in which everything will come out pubicly.
Druze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2007, 21:39 PM   #24 (permalink)
Ray
Postmaster General
Military Professional
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 25,850
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Druze View Post
Israel had established itself as one of the best logistical supply armies in its previous wars. For such a small country to take over so much territory in such a short time it needs a flawless ferrying of supplies so as not to impede advance. the fact that supplies were short in the Lebanon war shows that the ground units places insides Lebanon were merely symbolic and small. Engineer and supply units were not deployed correctly and when they were deployed they were lacking in numbers. battalions like mine don't use regular supplies as we are essentially on our own once behind enemy lines and we are very adept at gathering our own supplies.

But you know what? Israel is lucky that this wasn't a major war, and Israel is also lucky to be sometimes to open a democracy in its post-war inquiry's in which everything will come out pubicly.
That is history.

Are you suggesting the battles conducted in Lebanon was some sort of a picnic the IDF decided to have? In war or combat, there can be nothing half way home or a lark.

I can't believe that you were so short of equipment that you did not have water bottles/ jerricans/water trucks? What operations were the IDF on? What about ammunition?

Behind enemy lines you are on your own without the basic essentials? The enemy is a damn fool that they did not poison the water supplies they abandoned!

Doesn't the IDF advance on an axis and don't you open up an axis of maintenance?

I must say you are very fortunate to have dumb Bedouin as your enemy!

I have seen the Arab army personnel and I know they are pretty dumb and most importantly, very lazy!
Ray is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2007, 16:56 PM   #25 (permalink)
Stan187
WAB BOUNCER
Senior Contributor
 
Stan187's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-06
Posts: 2,283
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray View Post

I must say you are very fortunate to have dumb Bedouin as your enemy!
I'm pretty sure, sir, that the only Bedouins who possibly fought during this war were on the Israeli side.

And there were tank units ferrying water to exhausted rifle companies. I know because my cousin told me about it from personal reservist experience In Lebanon.
__________________
In Iran people belive pepsi stands for pay each penny save israel. -urmomma158
The Russian Navy is still a threat, but only to those unlucky enough to be Russian sailors.-highsea
Stan187 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 03:21 AM   #26 (permalink)
Ray
Postmaster General
Military Professional
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 25,850
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stan187 View Post
I'm pretty sure, sir, that the only Bedouins who possibly fought during this war were on the Israeli side.

And there were tank units ferrying water to exhausted rifle companies. I know because my cousin told me about it from personal reservist experience In Lebanon.

If tanks ferry water, then there is something terribly wrong.

And it does not speak of any logistic planning at all!

Please read up on the Principle of War - Economy of Effort!

It is like using a Stretch limousine with outriders and sirens to ferry vagrants to the jail for vagrancy!

Do forgive me, this is totally incongruent with the my idea of the dash, derring do and flamboyance of Sharon's crossing of the Suez with the Arabs shivering in their pants!

My classmate from India is/ was in the IDF and his anecdotes were something totally different from the idea you all are giving me!

Bedous are in the Israeli Army?

As I said before, I have experience with the Arab military. I find them lazy and dumb except for the PLO.

I retired too early or else I would have gone and observed the IDF first hand!

What you chaps are writing is not my idea of what I have read of the IDF.

Last edited by Ray : 05-03-2007 at 03:27 AM.
Ray is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 12:02 PM   #27 (permalink)
Druze
Regular
 
Druze's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-23-07
Posts: 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray View Post
That is history.

Are you suggesting the battles conducted in Lebanon was some sort of a picnic the IDF decided to have? In war or combat, there can be nothing half way home or a lark.

I can't believe that you were so short of equipment that you did not have water bottles/ jerricans/water trucks? What operations were the IDF on? What about ammunition?

Behind enemy lines you are on your own without the basic essentials? The enemy is a damn fool that they did not poison the water supplies they abandoned!

Doesn't the IDF advance on an axis and don't you open up an axis of maintenance?

I must say you are very fortunate to have dumb Bedouin as your enemy!

I have seen the Arab army personnel and I know they are pretty dumb and most importantly, very lazy!
No Israel had supply lines set. However the constant changing of plans every single day incorporates major shifting in supplies. The lack of supplies was something reported by a few units not all the IDF. It wasn't an epidemic. I'm not a logistical commander so I can't say how many supply troops you need per active troops and all the other logistical operations needed to plan an assault.
And my unit specifically doesn't carry water for an entire operation as we go behind enemy lines for an undetermined previous amount of time as opposed to other units.
Ammunition I don't believe was much of a problem. IDF soldiers conserve ammunition well and use air strikes and their FAO whenever possible.
Druze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 12:17 PM   #28 (permalink)
Stan187
WAB BOUNCER
Senior Contributor
 
Stan187's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-06
Posts: 2,283
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray View Post
If tanks ferry water, then there is something terribly wrong.

And it does not speak of any logistic planning at all!

Please read up on the Principle of War - Economy of Effort!

It is like using a Stretch limousine with outriders and sirens to ferry vagrants to the jail for vagrancy!

Do forgive me, this is totally incongruent with the my idea of the dash, derring do and flamboyance of Sharon's crossing of the Suez with the Arabs shivering in their pants!

My classmate from India is/ was in the IDF and his anecdotes were something totally different from the idea you all are giving me!

Bedous are in the Israeli Army?

As I said before, I have experience with the Arab military. I find them lazy and dumb except for the PLO.

I retired too early or else I would have gone and observed the IDF first hand!

What you chaps are writing is not my idea of what I have read of the IDF.

I'm not trying to justify it, sir, I'm simply saying such was the case in at least a few instances.

As Druze pointed out, both Bedouin and Druze soldiers serve in the IDF, often as trackers and scouts because they are taught this from childhood.
Stan187 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 13:04 PM   #29 (permalink)
Druze
Regular
 
Druze's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-23-07
Posts: 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stan187 View Post
I'm not trying to justify it, sir, I'm simply saying such was the case in at least a few instances.

As Druze pointed out, both Bedouin and Druze soldiers serve in the IDF, often as trackers and scouts because they are taught this from childhood.

Bedouins and Druze are more crucial to Israel's national security then ever before. As young Sephardic Jews no longer speak any Arabic it is the job of native Arabic speakers to work in intelligence gathering in Israel's wide intelligence apparatus.

During the war, and I'm not sure which raid it was but I believe it was Qana, an amphibious special ops unit that was sent deep behind enemy lines was apparently opened fire on after a Hezbollah road block talked to the soldiers who were undercover and noticed a strange accent. The raid is still classified so its hard to know for sure.

Bedouins also served very disproportionately in Gaza during the occupation.
Druze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 14:23 PM   #30 (permalink)
Ray
Postmaster General
Military Professional
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 25,850
Country:
I will not comment since I find any further discussion would expose the IDF.
Ray is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BMPT - the new Russian class - Tank Assistance Combat Vehicle. Garry Land Forces 123 11-05-2007 18:39 PM
Articles and links for the Military Professional Officer of Engineers The Staff College 115 11-20-2006 11:28 AM
2003 Navy Global Conops Defcon 6 Naval Forces 6 07-06-2006 22:26 PM
IDF lessons from 1982 troung Warfare in the Modern Age 0 10-14-2005 17:36 PM
A Preemptive Attack on Iran's Nuclear Facilities: Possible Consequences lulldapull International Defense Topics 14 11-20-2004 16:27 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:10 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8