ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > International Strategic Affairs > Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 11-12-2006, 23:31 PM   #1 (permalink)
Julie
Moderator
 
Julie's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-04-03
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 6,640
Country:
Hamas agrees to international peace conference with Israel

CAIRO, Egypt (AP) -- The Hamas-led Palestinian government agreed Sunday to an international peace conference with Israel.

The decision came after the Arab League -- angered by Israel's military offensive in Gaza -- agreed to end a financial blockade on the Palestinians.

Palestinian Foreign Minister Mahmoud Zahar of Hamas endorsed a statement by Arab foreign ministers calling for the peace conference during a meeting in Cairo to respond to a U.S. veto of a U.N. Security Council resolution condemning the Gaza offensive.

Israel responded by saying it would not hold talks with Hamas unless it agreed to demands, backed by the U.S. and Europe, that the group recognize Israel, renounce violence and abide by existing agreements between Israel and Palestinians.

Zahar said the Palestinians had asked for the peace conference "in order to reach just and comprehensive solutions."

The West cut off hundreds of millions of dollars in international aid and tax revenues to the Palestinians after Hamas took power in March in an effort to pressure the Islamic militant group to moderate its anti-Israel ideology.

Hamas is a Palestinian Islamic fundamentalist organization. The group's military wing, Izzedine al Qassam, has admitted responsibility for terrorist attacks against Israeli civilians as well as attacks against the Israeli military.

Israel made clear that Hamas' shift fell short of its demands. Mark Regev, a foreign ministry spokesman, said he was not aware of the conference proposal. But he said Hamas could not be a party to talks with Israel unless it met the international community's stipulations.

"A multilateral conference doesn't make Hamas legitimate," Regev said. "What makes Hamas legitimate is accepting the international benchmarks."

Hamas' decision came as Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert arrived in Washington on Sunday ahead of a meeting with President Bush on Monday.

The Arab League statement said ministers sought a conference to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict "according to international resolutions and the principle of 'land for peace'."

Arabs want Hamas to endorse a 2002 Arab initiative that calls for peace in exchange for land seized by Israel in the 1967 Middle East war -- the West Bank, the Gaza Strip and east Jerusalem.

Sunday was the first time Zahar had attended an Arab foreign ministers' meeting since Hamas became the ruling party. The Arab League had previously refused to let him join unless Hamas accepted the peace initiative.

Arab ministers also decided Sunday to end a financial blockade on the Palestinians to show their anger over U.S. veto in the Security Council on Saturday.

The U.N. draft resolution would have condemned the Israeli offensive in Gaza that has killed more 50 people recently and also demanded that Israeli troops pull out of the territory.

U.S. Ambassador John Bolton said the Arab-backed resolution was "biased against Israel and politically motivated."

It was the second U.S. veto of a draft resolution on Israeli military operations in Gaza this year.

"There will no longer be an international siege," said Bahrain's Foreign Minister Sheik Khalid bin Ahmed Al Khalifa.

The economic sanctions against Hamas have debilitated the Palestinians and have led to clashes between the Islamic militants and the more moderate Fatah party led by Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas.

Abbas has been trying to form a more moderate government and renew the peace process with Israel.

Arab banks have not transferred funds to the Hamas-run Palestinian Authority for fear of U.S.-led sanctions. The United States and European Union lists Hamas as a terrorist organization and takes steps against those who transfer funds to such groups.

It was not immediately clear whether Arab banks would immediately begin transactions in response to Sunday's decision and if sanctions would be imposed if they did.

State Department spokesman Kurtis Cooper said he had no immediate comment on that question.

Arab League Secretary-General Amr Moussa said the decision to break the Western-lead financial blockade was a message to the United States.

"Our message is loud and clear to those who take unfriendly positions against Arabs," Moussa told reporters in Cairo.

In an immediate show of support, Kuwait's foreign minister said his country would send $30 million to the Palestinians, and Bahrain's foreign minister said the Arab countries would begin contacting international financial institutions to get the money transferred to the Palestinians.

Mohammed Awad, secretary general of the Palestinian Cabinet, said at least $52 million would be ready for immediate transfer. The Arab League should now be able to transfer the money to the government accounts instead of to the president's coffers, he said.

"Most banks follow their governments. They must remove the blockade," Awad told The Associated Press in Gaza City.

The money would go to paying salaries, Awad said.

The ministers also decided to ask the U.N. General Assembly to hold a special session to discuss the situation in the Palestinian territories.

Israeli artillery killed at least 18 civilians in a crowded Gaza neighborhood of Beit Hanoun on Wednesday, the latest bloodshed in an offensive meant to halt militant rocket attacks. (Watch mourners carry bodies of victims through the streets -- 1:49)

The incident marked the highest number of Palestinian civilians killed in a single strike since fighting erupted six years ago.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/....ap/index.html
Julie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2006, 13:34 PM   #2 (permalink)
Intifadah
New Member
 
Join Date: 11-13-06
Posts: 2
Country:
HAMAS rules!
Intifadah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2006, 14:49 PM   #3 (permalink)
TopHatter
Administrator
 
TopHatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-03-03
Location: Fort Myers FL
Posts: 9,822
Country:
Send a message via AIM to TopHatter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Intifadah View Post
HAMAS rules!
Please read the Forum Rules, particularly 2.11
TopHatter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2006, 15:23 PM   #4 (permalink)
Intifadah
New Member
 
Join Date: 11-13-06
Posts: 2
Country:
I did, and I don't understand.....how can we place labels like this when so many people have so many different points of view?
Intifadah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2006, 15:42 PM   #5 (permalink)
Julie
Moderator
 
Julie's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-04-03
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 6,640
Country:
Paragraph 2, Item #11:

11. expressing support for groups that are internationally recognized as terrorist or criminal organizations.

Hamas has forever fought the peace-initiative, never backed it, which the Arab League are now stepping in to force them to do.
Julie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2006, 15:43 PM   #6 (permalink)
ZFBoxcar
Moderator
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 2,129
Country:
Send a message via MSN to ZFBoxcar
Quote:
I did, and I don't understand.....how can we place labels like this when so many people have so many different points of view?
Because "we" are participants in a privately owned forum with rules established by said owner. As well, Hamas is recognized by even the anti-Israel EU as a terrorist organization. The fact that some tyrants in the Middle East who oppress their own people disagree is irrelevant, or even supportive of the argument that Hamas is scum. If you want to have an actual debate on the merits of the Intifadah, Palestinian violence, the state of Israel, etc, please start one. But just going "Hamas rules" is not acceptable.
ZFBoxcar is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Should members of the Church of God go to war? Ray World Affairs Board Pub 22 06-19-2008 09:53 AM
Religion And Secularism In Israel Ray Current Affairs 46 04-05-2007 14:49 PM
Israel Must Be Held Accountable For Its International Law Violations SolveEtCoagula World Affairs Board Pub 59 08-12-2006 15:58 PM
Iran to be refered to U.N. Security Council Dreadnought Political Discussions 13 01-16-2006 15:14 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:23 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8