ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > International Strategic Affairs > Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 02-27-2006, 11:26 AM   #16 (permalink)
Ray
Postmaster General
Military Professional
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 26,149
Country:
We fly Mi 17.

They are not cheap to fly. They are rough, robust and heavy.

On Maintainability, they are very reliable. In fact, they are like trucks. One kick on the tyres and the nuts and bolts fall in place ready for the mission!

I wonder if it will remain a stable platform if missiles are launched from it and what effect on the accuracy would be there?

__________________


"Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

HAKUNA MATATA

Last edited by Ray : 02-27-2006 at 11:28 AM.
Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2006, 02:57 AM   #17 (permalink)
Tronic
Navajo Code Talker
Senior Contributor
 
Tronic's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-27-04
Location: Patiala, India
Posts: 5,288
Country:
hmm... ours have rocket pods i believe, i don't know if any other air force flies them with missiles on em.
__________________
Nabha Sparasham Deeptam
-Touch The Sky With Glory
Tronic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2006, 03:11 AM   #18 (permalink)
Garry
Defense Professional
 
Join Date: 06-18-04
Posts: 1,528
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray
We fly Mi 17.

They are not cheap to fly. They are rough, robust and heavy.

On Maintainability, they are very reliable. In fact, they are like trucks. One kick on the tyres and the nuts and bolts fall in place ready for the mission!

I wonder if it will remain a stable platform if missiles are launched from it and what effect on the accuracy would be there?

Hi Ray, I guess that Mi-17 is not really good platform for acurate bombing.... they are basically made to be trucks. I totally agree that it is very robust. As for rough.... I was flying on a VIP refitted Mi-17.... except for terrible noise it was looking very nice inside and outside.

I read that it can be fitted with air to surface missiles.... yes it is fitted in armies but any helicopter big enough can cary a pod with unguided air to survace missiles as a secondary capability. Then any chopper is a millitary hardware!!!

Mi-17 requirees less hours of maintanance per flight hour than its direct competitors - heavy helicopters American S-92 and European EH-101. It is actually better in this terms than even much lighter Black Hawk. As for the cost per flight hour it is estimated at $800 for hour on civil Mi-17s..... it is around 4.5 times cheaper than cost of flight hour of S-92.... and probably much cheaper than an hour of EH-101. Many compare Mi-17 cost per flight hour to much lighter western helicopters.... but this is not correct. In its heavy family Mi-17 remains cheapest for maintainance.... and with VK-2500 engines it is on par in terms of fuel efficiency.

I actually heard that Palestinians will get some of their helicopters refitted to VIP transport. Is it really a millitary hardware?

Last edited by Garry : 03-04-2006 at 03:14 AM.
Garry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2006, 03:55 AM   #19 (permalink)
canoe
Military Professional
 
canoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-13-05
Posts: 698
Country:
Well given the political situation in the middle east this purchase makes perfect sense.

The Mi-17's are cheaper, easier to acquire (politics) and are less of an issue to lose. Hamas knows if things go reallly south with the Isrealies it won't matter what choppers they have, they'll either be shot down or bombed on the ground.

The other aspect is it will be easier for Hamas to get parts for Mi-17's even if there under sanctions from everyone else.

To be honest I'm not even sure why Hamas would waste their money with military choppers. I'm assuming there planning to buy these to use them as weapon platforms. They'd be better off buying portable anti-tank weapons and surface to air missiles. Maybe if they bought a crap load of flares and reflective tape they could dump them all over the roads to *attempt* to clutter the Isreali aircraft's infrared sensors. Combined with alot of smoke it could at least make it aggrivating for the Isrealies.
canoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2006, 18:10 PM   #20 (permalink)
Kontakt Era
Patron
 
Join Date: 10-28-04
Posts: 227
Hmmm...dont the Iranians give a lot of aid to Palestine? They probably got the money from there for these weapons right? In any case, why would Isreal be worried? This little deal is a parady if u think about it. Maybe the government wants this to suppress domestic violence from various other warlords. They probably arent trying to wage war.
Kontakt Era is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2006, 11:16 AM   #21 (permalink)
glow
Banished
Regular
 
Join Date: 04-15-05
Posts: 93
Well if it wasn't Russia it be China. You want it they got they don't care who's buying
glow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2006, 22:42 PM   #22 (permalink)
Kontakt Era
Patron
 
Join Date: 10-28-04
Posts: 227
idk its just it seems so like grimey tat Russia would actually stoop to the point of selling any type of arms to a place filled with raging lunatics. i mean they're part of the security council....arent they supposed to KEEP the peace? lol
Kontakt Era is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2006, 22:16 PM   #23 (permalink)
Onyxnine
Banished
 
Join Date: 05-07-06
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 14
Jerusalem is the key. Whoever holds Jerusalem holds the fulcrum of world history. We should first and foremost be supporting Israel in their struggle against the Arab states, and Iran.
Hamas can buy all the used Russian equipment they want-- as many have pointed out, they can neither maintain nor effectively operate sophisticated military equipment-- and the Russians aren't going to let their fingers get burned through too close an association w/Hamas.
Onyxnine is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Civil War in Palestine Criniit Current Affairs 9 12-20-2006 18:36 PM
U.S. and Israel Discuss Undermining Hamas troung Israeli-Palestinian Conflict 1 02-28-2006 03:07 AM
Hamas, Israel, the World and Palestine Ray International Defense Topics 8 02-22-2006 01:09 AM
Hamas floats Palestinian 'army' EricTheRed Israeli-Palestinian Conflict 0 01-29-2006 09:08 AM
Israel after Sharon Bulgaroctonus Political Discussions 9 01-10-2006 11:44 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:55 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8