+ Reply to Thread
Page 9 of 15 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 LastLast
Results 121 to 135 of 214

Thread: Endgame in Iran?

  1. #121
    Senior Contributor kuku's Avatar
    Join Date
    28 Feb 08
    Location
    delhi
    Posts
    774
    Country: India
    could just pump the water if the reservoirs still there.

    Sewage doesnot have to contaminate reservoirs or groundwater that ways.
    cheers

  2. #122
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    21,433
    Country: Canada
    How are you going to pump the sewage out with no electricity and how are you going to get the crap out when the main pipes are busted? How are you going to get the clean water to where it's needed?

    Again, an earthquake tells you all that.
    Chimo

  3. #123
    Senior Contributor kuku's Avatar
    Join Date
    28 Feb 08
    Location
    delhi
    Posts
    774
    Country: India
    pumps running on oil, have seen entire industrial pockets right near delhi running exclusively on oil/gas generated electricity.

    Busted pipes would signal delibrate attack on a city with the aim of destroying it, what was written was an attack on the electricity grid in order to shut it down.

    If you want to know how to get drinking water to where its needed i think the city of delhi would be a good example, i dont know anyone who drinks tapwater without using some kind of filtering/boiling.

    However yes if someone attacks with that aim, destroyes the water and waste water distribution network, attacks the reservoirs i would say that there is little chance of recovery, a simple boil water warning might not suffice.
    cheers

  4. #124
    tankie Military Professional tankie's Avatar
    Join Date
    22 Nov 06
    Location
    u/k
    Posts
    10,424
    Country: UK
    Quote Originally Posted by kuku View Post
    .

    However yes if someone attacks with that aim, destroyes the water and waste water distribution network, attacks the reservoirs i would say that there is little chance of recovery, a simple boil water warning might not suffice.
    Especially when those nasty men called SAS and the US Marines toss dead camels down the wells






    TANKIE. ECO WARRIOR , SAVE THE TREES

  5. #125
    Senior Contributor kuku's Avatar
    Join Date
    28 Feb 08
    Location
    delhi
    Posts
    774
    Country: India
    Dont know about US Marines, but SAS, sabotaging ayatollahs toilet facility added to a already long list of jobs.:O
    cheers

  6. #126
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    21,433
    Country: Canada
    Quote Originally Posted by kuku View Post
    pumps running on oil, have seen entire industrial pockets right near delhi running exclusively on oil/gas generated electricity.
    And those would be targetted as well. What is needed to run a cascade can also run a small city.

    Quote Originally Posted by kuku View Post
    Busted pipes would signal delibrate attack on a city with the aim of destroying it, what was written was an attack on the electricity grid in order to shut it down.
    Nuke plants need water more than people.

    Quote Originally Posted by kuku View Post
    If you want to know how to get drinking water to where its needed i think the city of delhi would be a good example, i dont know anyone who drinks tapwater without using some kind of filtering/boiling.

    However yes if someone attacks with that aim, destroyes the water and waste water distribution network, attacks the reservoirs i would say that there is little chance of recovery, a simple boil water warning might not suffice.
    The idea is to collapse any and all infrastructure that can support a nuclear weapons plant. The people are collateral damage.
    Chimo

  7. #127
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    12 Jun 07
    Posts
    1,001
    Quote Originally Posted by S-2 View Post
    Here's a link for Tankie's Reuters article-


    As matters stand, I'm not particularly overwhelmed in any case. Most of the opposition has rallied around dissident clerics. How that shakes out WRT internat'l relations might prove questionable. Bluntly, we may be facing a variation of a theme, discernable internally but promising no change in its external outlook.
    Im afraid i share your sentiments as well. The problem that the international community has with Iran is its nuclear program. Right now as it stands i haven't heard anyone from the opposition say anything different to what the current regime says as far as the nuclear issue is concerned. We might just be used by the opposition to grab power for itself but end up with the same problem we had in the first place.

  8. #128
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    12 Jun 07
    Posts
    1,001
    Quote Originally Posted by Bigfella View Post
    Zinja,

    Apologies if I got the wrong end of the stick. I'm not a great fan of cheap shots, even against politicians I don't much like. As it happens I am not especially impressed by Obama after one year, but I think he is handling this OK.

    I largely agree with your second point. I am happy to see the US support freedom & democracy, but that support has to be carefully calculated to suit each situation. You are right about people having to be willing to secure their own freedom, though I have no objection to well targetted outside assistance (without which America would have struggled to win independence). In this case, however, 'hands off' is by far the best approach. I too hope that these brave Iranians, many of them kids, are successful.
    I wholly agree Bigfella!

  9. #129
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    12 Jun 07
    Posts
    1,001
    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
    Hey, idiot. The crowd here sees NO choice but to bomb. Iran is making nukes while under the protection of the NPT ... and therefore SUBJECT TO the punishment of the NPT.
    OoE, personally im for to bombing the mullahs to stone age but i don't want the US bearing the responsibility, at least not alone. Even those like China, Russia and some Arab countries know that Iran is being a nuisance but they are just cornering the US and then reap the benefits. Everybody was on US's throat when they went down town Baghdad accusing the US of being after oil, but now who are drilling the oil from Iraq enjoying the security that has been provided by hard earned US tax payer dollars and US blood?

    If Iran is to be bombed it has to be an international effort everyone bearing a share of the cost. Why should the US be lured into bankrupting itself for the benefit of others?

  10. #130
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    12 Jun 07
    Posts
    1,001
    Quote Originally Posted by Aryajet View Post
    The most insensitive, immoral and selfish comment I've ever read in WAB.
    I can post videos and pix of what is going in Iran and what Iranian people are going through at this moment but I will refrain from doing so b/c nothing will change yours and other "Bomb Bomb Baby" crowd's mindset.
    Insensitive and immoral in what sense? Why did you not toi-toi the streets when US servicemen were being blown to pieces by Iran made bombs? How is that more moral than merely saying the Iranians should pave their own freedom? Yes, human suffering caused by oppressive regimes is inexcusable and our hearts go out to the suffering Iranians who are on the receiving end of this regime, and we do wish them speedy success in their endeavor. However to think that your cause is more deserving because you can post videos of, may i respectfully say 8 people, when there has been no street protests when more than 4 000 US servicemen were being killed by weapons made by your same country is, to put it mildly, hypocritical.
    Last edited by Zinja; 31 Dec 09, at 19:19.

  11. #131
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    12 Jun 07
    Posts
    1,001
    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
    Captain,
    In other words, if we cannot identify the bomb making factories, we will spread cholera throughout Iran.

    Sucks big time, doesn't it?
    Yep! It sure does but that is the fact of life sir.

  12. #132
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    12 Jun 07
    Posts
    1,001
    Quote Originally Posted by Chunder View Post
    That's going to be a real blow to them as Tehran has just undertaken a Sewerage collection & infrastructure treatment program through a loan from the World Bank / IMF whatever (escaped me now) Prior to 2002 the cities effluent was just dumped into the ground I.E prior they did not have treatment. Back to 2002.
    Im surprised they managed to get funds from the world financial institutions when the US could have vetoed it.

  13. #133
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    12 Jun 07
    Posts
    1,001
    Quote Originally Posted by pChan View Post
    Israel prefers A-Jad in command than the "reformists" who may invariably support their proxies. And there is a reason for that. Any regime "adjustment" without removal of the ideological underpinnings would only give ammunition to wild-eyed lefties. These lefties can be counted on to do maximum damage by letting an Iran still arming its proxies acquire nukes.

    Personally I see these wild-eyed lefties with their "I don't agree with the mullahs but you know they have a point when they ...... " BS are about in the same plane as the "silent" muslims who don't come out on the streets to unconditionally condemn the jihadis and would rather parrot the line "I abhor suicide bombers but you know they....". I used to think that by themselves they are not dangerous but now I am not so sure.

    I wish those brave souls in the streets of Teheran every success. I also hope they succeed in installing a regime more representative of themselves for anything short of that is unacceptable.
    Took words out of my mouth Chan. Co-signed to that!

  14. #134
    Contributor 1980s's Avatar
    Join Date
    19 Jul 08
    Posts
    366
    Country: Iran
    Quote Originally Posted by Zinja View Post
    Insensitive and immoral in what sense? Why did you not toi-toi the streets US servicemen were being blown to pieces by Iran made bombs? How is that more moral than merely saying the Iranians should pave their own freedom? Yes, human suffering caused by oppressive regimes is inexcusable and our hearts go out to the suffering Iranians who are on the receiving end of this regime, and we do wish them speedy success in their endeavor. However to think that your cause is more deserving because you can post videos of, may i respectfully say 8 people, when there has been no street protests when more than 4 000 US servicemen were being killed by weapons made by your same country is, to put it mildly, hypocritical.
    Why should Iranians demonstrate when US soldiers are killed? Im confident that the majority of Iranians do not support the I.R’s interference in Iraq but im sure neither do Iranians support the occupation of that country, especially now given that the pretext to that war was based on lies and false assumptions. However, i can say that when 9/11 2001 occurred large crowds of Iranians came out onto the streets to hold candle-lit vigils for the American people. Quite unlike the scenes in many other Middle Eastern countries where some people even publicly celebrated those acts of terrorism.

    Now, consider what is really hypocritical about the West – Iran stand off. That is the relationship that European Union members have with the Islamic Republic; both economic and political. While Angela Merkel usually condemns the I.R’s authoritarianism and brutality whenever a mass demonstration in Iran is suppressed Germany apparently still remains as one of the biggest EU trading partners of Iran. Italy is another.

    Sanctions against Iran have failed, not solely because the I.R is disingenuous during negotiations, but because the European’s themselves are not serious about braking off economic and / or political relations with the Islamic Republic. That is the hypocrisy, not the silence of Iranian people over the fate of American soldiers in Iraq. Do Americans rally when Afghan and Iraqi civilians are killed by US forces? The silence does not imply that people from either country support such incidents.

    Negations with Iran over the nuclear programme have four stumbling blocks, the Islamic Republic being only one of them. Russia, China and the European Union being the other three. The Europeans might say all the things that the US wants to hear, but they don’t follow-up on them. All of them recognize the Islamic Republic, all of them trade with the Islamic Republic. Empty words from the EU, words of support or neutrality from the Chinese and Russians. And then some people, wonder why the Islamic Republic doesn’t take negotiations seriously?

  15. #135
    Senior Contributor kuku's Avatar
    Join Date
    28 Feb 08
    Location
    delhi
    Posts
    774
    Country: India
    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
    And those would be targetted as well. What is needed to run a cascade can also run a small city.

    Nuke plants need water more than people.

    The idea is to collapse any and all infrastructure that can support a nuclear weapons plant. The people are collateral damage.
    With the petrochemical industry gone, and the water/wastewater treatment facilities gone with roads and all the colleges with any PG cources in physics gone, i think the term back by a century might be accurate.

    got it dear sir, happy new year to you....
    cheers

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. US exports to Iran increase in Bush years
    By troung in forum International Economy
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12 Jul 08,, 20:34
  2. Stopping Iran:Why the Case For Military Action Still Stands
    By urmomma158 in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11 May 08,, 02:58
  3. When Is Islamic Terrorism Actually "Anti-Islamic Activity"?
    By dalem in forum International Economy
    Replies: 72
    Last Post: 30 Jan 08,, 08:45
  4. Candidates, How would you grapple with Iran's nuclear drive?
    By FibrillatorD in forum American Politics & Economy
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 16 Aug 07,, 17:11
  5. A Preemptive Attack on Iran's Nuclear Facilities: Possible Consequences
    By lulldapull in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 20 Nov 04,, 21:27

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts