ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > International Strategic Affairs > The Iranian Question
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 10-30-2007, 05:36 AM   #1 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,784
Country:
France & US on same page

I like Sarko.
Quote:
IAEA findings on Iran dismissed

France and the US have dismissed a finding by the head of the UN's nuclear watchdog Mohammed ElBaradei that there is no evidence of Iran building a bomb.

French Defence Minister Herve Morin challenged Iran to allow UN inspectors unlimited access to sites.

A White House spokeswoman said Iran was "enriching and reprocessing uranium, and the reason that one does that is to lead towards a nuclear weapon".

Mr ElBaradei said on Sunday that Tehran was years away from developing a bomb.

Iran denies it is seeking to build nuclear weapons and says it wants only civilian nuclear energy.

Its refusal to stop enriching uranium - a process which can lead to a nuclear bomb - has led the UN Security Council to impose two sets of sanctions, which the US has followed up with unilateral penalties of its own.

French scepticism

"Our information, which is backed up by other countries, is contrary [to Mr ElBaradei's comments]," Mr Morin told reporters on a visit to Abu Dhabi.

"If... ElBaradei is right then there is no reason that Iran stops ElBaradei and the IAEA [the UN nuclear watchdog] from carrying out inspections.

"If [the nuclear programme] is only civil what would be the reason to stop international inspections?"

The IAEA has some access to Iranian nuclear facilities but Tehran's refusal to allow intrusive inspections means the UN cannot verify the absence of undeclared nuclear material.

The US Ambassador to the UN, Zalmay Khalilzad, said on Monday that Washington saw "no indication" Iran was moving towards suspending uranium enrichment.
BBC NEWS | Middle East | IAEA findings on Iran dismissed
__________________
The Buck Stops Here
Ironduke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2007, 13:00 PM   #2 (permalink)
Dreadnought
Senior Contributor
 
Dreadnought's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Posts: 5,199
Country:
IMO,France's new president is a breath of fresh air to the U.S. He seems like a pretty good guy who would like to renew ties with us. I was glad to see his stop his interview with cbs when they fired the cheap shots about his divorce which surely were not in the brief he was given before hand.

Bravo Sir, gentlemenly standards still do exist and I respect you for it.
__________________
Fortitude.....The strength to persist...The courage to endure.
Dreadnought is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2007, 01:18 AM   #3 (permalink)
Bella
Patron
 
Join Date: 09-03-07
Location: Chicago
Posts: 281
Country:
What I don't understand is, If Iran is not building nuclear weapons, then why don't they just let the U.N. inspectors poke around to prove them right.
Also, if ElBaradei says that there is no evidence that Iran is not producing WMD's, what is he basing his findings over? Anyone can say that from a distance. This whole thing is B.S. If everyone followed ElBaradei's conclusions, Iran will have a Nuke in a few years.
Bella is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2007, 13:18 PM   #4 (permalink)
Dreadnought
Senior Contributor
 
Dreadnought's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Posts: 5,199
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bella View Post
What I don't understand is, If Iran is not building nuclear weapons, then why don't they just let the U.N. inspectors poke around to prove them right.
Also, if ElBaradei says that there is no evidence that Iran is not producing WMD's, what is he basing his findings over? Anyone can say that from a distance. This whole thing is B.S. If everyone followed ElBaradei's conclusions, Iran will have a Nuke in a few years.
Thats what the entire U.N. is asking.

To be truthfull I certainly dont trust ElBaradei nor his conclusions I would rather trust foreign intelligence first and then listen to what he has to say and compare and ask him his explanation. It cant be very accurate if he cannot inspect when he wants to. IE "Quick hide this this and this person and we will tell him to come back at a later day". Yeah I d trust em.

To be truthfull as well again I would much rather see a German,Canadian,French,British head that team. Somebody that is all to well familiar with the games they play such as hide and seek. That way nobody can scream American influence. It seems the harder questions arent being asked by his team nor the hard reports being made to the U.N. about inspection denials. And thats a primary reason why countries including America are growing impatient with that regime and its games. But if/when we pull the plug we will be the bad guys once again to the U.N. So be.

Last edited by Dreadnought : 10-31-2007 at 13:25 PM.
Dreadnought is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2007, 13:21 PM   #5 (permalink)
smilingassassin
Senior Contributor
 
smilingassassin's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-12-03
Location: Vancouver Canada
Posts: 2,706
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bella View Post
What I don't understand is, If Iran is not building nuclear weapons, then why don't they just let the U.N. inspectors poke around to prove them right.
Also, if ElBaradei says that there is no evidence that Iran is not producing WMD's, what is he basing his findings over? Anyone can say that from a distance. This whole thing is B.S. If everyone followed ElBaradei's conclusions, Iran will have a Nuke in a few years.
Because it's painfully obvious that it is for the purpose of aquiring nuclear weapons, they've purchased plans for a bomb from AQ Khan if I'm not mistaken. They have repeatedly called for the distruction of Isreal, "they" meaning the Mad Mulahs and A-Jad. They are finatics, plain and simple and finatics can't hide their schemes if they present them to the public.
__________________
Facts to a liberal is like Kryptonite to Superman.

-- Larry Elder
smilingassassin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2007, 20:07 PM   #6 (permalink)
Feanor
Banished
 
Join Date: 06-12-07
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,385
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreadnought View Post
IMO,France's new president is a breath of fresh air to the U.S. He seems like a pretty good guy who would like to renew ties with us. I was glad to see his stop his interview with cbs when they fired the cheap shots about his divorce which surely were not in the brief he was given before hand.

Bravo Sir, gentlemenly standards still do exist and I respect you for it.
Careful. At this rate M1's will be competing with the Leclerc for the number of reverse gears so that it can keep up with the french.
Feanor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2007, 09:15 AM   #7 (permalink)
Dreadnought
Senior Contributor
 
Dreadnought's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Posts: 5,199
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feanor View Post
Careful. At this rate M1's will be competing with the Leclerc for the number of reverse gears so that it can keep up with the french.
Not a chance.
Dreadnought is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pakistan ,Two Nation Theory and a few lies Samudra Warfare in the Modern Age 131 01-11-2008 05:16 AM
Indian Armies through the ages digvijay South Asian Defense Topics 184 11-28-2007 06:25 AM
French perfidy: The Chirac Doctrine Bluesman Political Discussions 66 11-11-2005 01:02 AM
25,000 civilians KilledIn Iraq jimmy22 The War in Iraq 88 08-13-2005 11:41 AM
The fall of France tarek Political Discussions 0 09-27-2004 18:26 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:07 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8