ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > International Strategic Affairs > The Iranian Question
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 09-14-2007, 09:08 AM   #76 (permalink)
timhaughton
Banished
 
Join Date: 09-12-07
Location: UK
Posts: 57
Country:
Send a message via Skype™ to timhaughton
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
Knowing is NOT the same proving and we HAVE PROVED Iran has a nuclear weapons program in violation of the NPT.
Again, we're back to the hypocrisy. The US breaks international law, but reserves the right to punish others for allegedly doing the same.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
Again, you care to define that violation? You have been dancing around without stating a single fact. I want you to cite the legallity so that I can present the arguements against it. In other words, put up or shut up.
As I've illustrated earlier, a couple of clear examples:

- Iraq - war of aggression, categorically illegal
- Nicaragua - See ICJ judgement

Just two examples, I could go on.
timhaughton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2007, 10:18 AM   #77 (permalink)
Kansas Bear
WAB Resident Historian
Senior Contributor
 
Kansas Bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-01-06
Location: Tornado Alley
Posts: 1,445
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreadnought
1) Dont supply arms,ied's to known major terrorists orgaizations (AKI,Hezbollah etc)
Quote:
Originally Posted by timhaughton
Terrorist is a funny word, it seems to mean different things depending on where you're standing. There are plenty of people in Lebanon who don't view Hezbollah as a terrorist organisation, and there are even more people who view the US as a terrorist state.

Shall we also leave aside all the support and backing the CIA gave Al Queda?

Are you saying the CIA funded Al-Qaeda, which didn't exist until 1990??


Quote:
Originally Posted by timhaughton View Post
It's just a name. Bin Laden's Arab Legion was commisioned by western intelligence agencies
The only thing mentioned in that article is this:

Quote:
Bin Laden was, though, a product of a monumental miscalculation by western security agencies. Throughout the 80s he was armed by the CIA and funded by the Saudis to wage jihad against the Russian occupation of Afghanistan.
No proof, no evidence, just someone writing two lines of rubbish.

Bin Laden had his own money and used it. He worked for Abdullah Yusuf Azzam, whom he later had killed.
Kansas Bear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2007, 10:48 AM   #78 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 14,876
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by timhaughton View Post
It's just a name. Bin Laden's Arab Legion was commisioned by western intelligence agencies:
KB already listed the idiot statement but Bin Laden's Arab legion was sent in by Zia - not the CIA. You do know who Zia is, don't you?

Quote:
Originally Posted by timhaughton View Post
Read above to see what Al-Qaida means, and where it came from.
You know, even a simple google would have given you the history of the organization and it has nothing to do with the CIA.

Al Qaeda - Google Search
__________________
Chimo
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2007, 10:53 AM   #79 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 14,876
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by timhaughton View Post
Again, we're back to the hypocrisy. The US breaks international law, but reserves the right to punish others for allegedly doing the same.
I will deal with your allegation a little later. However,

China-Vietnam, Russia-Chechnya, Ethiopia-Eritrea, China-India, Vietnam-Cambodia, Rwanda, ... the list can goto the moon about countries breaking international law ... and no one gives a damn about it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by timhaughton View Post
As I've illustrated earlier, a couple of clear examples:

- Iraq - war of aggression, categorically illegal
No, it is not. No charges are made. No charges will be made.


Quote:
Originally Posted by timhaughton View Post
- Nicaragua - See ICJ judgement

Just two examples, I could go on.
And here are the legal arguements against that judgement

U.S. Withdrawal from Nicaragua v. US - It's quite compelling that Nicaragua herself refused to accept ICJ judgements that were ruled against her but accepts ones that goes her way. So, the arguement that the ICJ has no jurisdiction has not been satisfied.
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2007, 17:46 PM   #80 (permalink)
xerxes
Padishah Shahanshah
Senior Contributor
 
xerxes's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-23-07
Location: Canada
Posts: 939
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by timhaughton View Post
Again, we're back to the hypocrisy. The US breaks international law, but reserves the right to punish others for allegedly doing the same.
There isnt much hypocracy messa thinks!!! All nations do break international laws, however the more powerfull the nation is, the higher is its intrest, its stake and responsibility. Therefore, small less powerfull nations probably break international laws as often if not more than united states, if we have the equations normalized by applying proportionality of a nation's wealth and power. As far as "reserving the right to punish others for allegedly doing the same". Other smaller nations with opposite polarity to that of United States, do equally reserve the right to punish others, smaller then them. SO again no hypocracy there. But there is much hypocracy in how average people think both in the United States, West and elsewhere in the world, such as the Middle East. I see it everyday.

The perception that US government is one singular Blackish entity is far from truth. If anything it is the greatest and the most humble imperial power in the annals of history. Certainly, I would rather live under the banner of Stars and Stripes, rather then Islamic cresent, be it Shia or Sunni, or the Reds or the Fascists. But all in all, I prefer nations like Canada and Japan. Less stupidity there. But ofcourse the fact remains that the US government today is as corrupt or has the potential to be as corrupt as any other nation on this heavenly earth.

These points asides, you must be reminded that you are in a forum where people are largely right wing conservatives. Atleast those who post often are. Therefore, you must ready to weather the storm of critisim that is unleash upon you. If you use spin, they will use spin. If you use technicalities, they will use technicalities. But in my opinion as long as you are centered and do not stray to much into leftism, you will do just fine here.
__________________
If we contrast the rapid progress of this mischievous discovery of gunpowder with the slow and laborious advances of reason, science, and the arts of peace, a philosopher, according to his temper, will laugh or weep at the folly of mankind. - Edward Gibbon

Last edited by xerxes : 09-14-2007 at 18:15 PM.
xerxes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2007, 17:54 PM   #81 (permalink)
HistoricalDavid
Distant Deeps or Skies
Senior Contributor
 
HistoricalDavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-19-05
Location: North London, UK
Posts: 1,916
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by timhaughton View Post
I came onto this board hoping for some intelligent debate. I think I'll be leaving it sorely disappointed.
Right, because you yourself showed us the correct way to go (!)
HistoricalDavid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2007, 18:10 PM   #82 (permalink)
Parihaka
Moderator
 
Parihaka's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-10-04
Location: Te Ika a Maui
Posts: 9,027
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by timhaughton View Post
How might that have gone? Let's take Nicaragua as an example.
No, lets not. Lets stick with your original assertions rather than this strawman, that assertion being the US is guilty of international terrorism. CLAIMING that acts of aggression is terrorism is just a personal opinion on your part, not international jurisprudence so at the moment your batting nil.
What else ya got?
__________________
In the realm of spirit, seek clarity; in the material world, seek utility.
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
Parihaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2007, 18:13 PM   #83 (permalink)
Parihaka
Moderator
 
Parihaka's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-10-04
Location: Te Ika a Maui
Posts: 9,027
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by xerxes View Post
your were like that Pari ??? ...

I think that this forum which is although by itself contains a lot of good information, has the bad sideffect of tipping people from one side to another, from left to right ...
I was in love with my own opinion, except of course it wasn't my own opinion, merely the standard fashions of my peers.
This board teaches you, or at least taught me to think, very few people however want to do that.
Parihaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2007, 18:14 PM   #84 (permalink)
Parihaka
Moderator
 
Parihaka's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-10-04
Location: Te Ika a Maui
Posts: 9,027
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by timhaughton View Post
Damn straight. You'll have to forgive my lingering respect for international law and human life. Hey, you never know, if I read this board long enough, you'l be able to turn me into a pro war hyper-aggressive neocon.
Again, wheres the international law? Wheres your respect for human life? You haven't demonstrated either here.
Parihaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2007, 18:18 PM   #85 (permalink)
Parihaka
Moderator
 
Parihaka's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-10-04
Location: Te Ika a Maui
Posts: 9,027
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by timhaughton View Post
I came onto this board hoping for some intelligent debate. I think I'll be leaving it sorely disappointed.

I've seen much use of non sequitur arguments, along the lines of "Iran has these blueprints, therefore they must be building a bomb" etc. When I reject them as illogical conclusions, people get upset. That's OK though.

I guess everyone is here to have their views enforced and backed up, not challenged. That's OK too. Perhaps an online support group would be better for you guys instead of a "discussion" forum. That way, your views would never be challenged.
Ho hum, unable to post a single fact other than how little you actually know vs what you believe, you now tell us how closed minded we all are for not falling over backwards in astonishment at how intelligent your opinions are.
Parihaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2007, 18:21 PM   #86 (permalink)
Parihaka
Moderator
 
Parihaka's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-10-04
Location: Te Ika a Maui
Posts: 9,027
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by glyn View Post
Don't kick your Teddybear into a corner and flounce off tim. There are many members of WAB who seldom if ever post but they read what appears on screen. We tend to forget about them. I was going to leave in a huff (on more than one occasion) but as long as nastiness is avoided I thought on more mature reflection that I should stay and fight my corner. Heck we are here to learn and exchange views, not court popularity. Tarry a while and I think you will come to regard WAB as a fellowship. Just my twopennyworth.
Exactly. Post from certain knowledge, not from opinion, and expect robust debate. Decrying the site because it disagrees with you and running away crying isn't the way to go.
Parihaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2007, 18:23 PM   #87 (permalink)
Parihaka
Moderator
 
Parihaka's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-10-04
Location: Te Ika a Maui
Posts: 9,027
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by timhaughton View Post

I love debate, as long as there's a respect for people's right to completely disagree with you without resorting to childish personal attacks.


.
Part of Bluesmans job as barman is to test the temper of new posters, especially the strongly opinionated ones. He kindly provides this service to us moderators for free.
Parihaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2007, 18:25 PM   #88 (permalink)
Parihaka
Moderator
 
Parihaka's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-10-04
Location: Te Ika a Maui
Posts: 9,027
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by glyn View Post
Yes, and on at least two occasions came very close to doing it ( but I'm led to believe that I'm not alone in hurling Teddy into a corner away from WAB!)
No indeed, I too have done it...



And that's far too many posts in a row by me.
Parihaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2007, 18:32 PM   #89 (permalink)
Kansas Bear
WAB Resident Historian
Senior Contributor
 
Kansas Bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-01-06
Location: Tornado Alley
Posts: 1,445
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parihaka View Post
Part of Bluesmans job as barman is to test the temper of new posters, especially the strongly opinionated ones. He kindly provides this service to us moderators for free.

It's a conspiracy!! They(mods/admins) are secretly bribing Bluesman with Butter Cookies!!!
Kansas Bear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2007, 18:49 PM   #90 (permalink)
xerxes
Padishah Shahanshah
Senior Contributor
 
xerxes's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-23-07
Location: Canada
Posts: 939
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parihaka View Post
I was in love with my own opinion, except of course it wasn't my own opinion, merely the standard fashions of my peers.
This board teaches you, or at least taught me to think, very few people however want to do that.
The board, certainly does teaches a lot:

not only via technical historical points provided by people like yourself, Shek, OOE, Ray, Archer, KB, mr Lukins, Zraver and others and Dalem (for the LOTR lore among other things), but it also certainly teaches to keep one's leftism (in my case) in check by applying rightism in order to keep centered. But how do we keep ultra rightism in ourself (not in my case) in check???

I am really sad to say that certain ultra right wing opinion here or in America for that matter are very VERY much intune with the ideas of conservative Pasdaran in my own nation. Or in Quebec for that matter with the French and their hardline ideas. The samethings are being said by each sides, but with different words.

have a nice weekend
xerxes is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
‘US had designs on Iran before Iraq invasion’ Ray The Iranian Question 10 05-01-2008 12:29 PM
Candidates, How would you grapple with Iran's nuclear drive? FibrillatorD 2008 US Presidential Election 36 08-16-2007 11:11 AM
Israel works on Iran N-strike Ray Political Discussions 30 01-14-2007 15:54 PM
Indian Army transformation Ray South Asian Defense Topics 36 12-22-2005 02:00 AM
An Article worthy of Lull..... MIKEMUN Political Discussions 2 03-18-2005 20:04 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:06 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8