Inside the struggle for Iran

Ray · 04-30-2007, 16:56 PM

Quote:

Inside the struggle for Iran

Simon Tisdall in Tehran
Monday April 30, 2007
The Guardian

A grand coalition of anti-government forces is planning a second Iranian revolution via the ballot box to deny President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad another term in office and break the grip of what they call the "militia state" on public life and personal freedom.

Encouraged by recent successes in local elections, opposition factions, democracy activists, and pro-reform clerics say they will bring together progressive parties loyal to former president Mohammad Khatami with so-called pragmatic conservatives led by Ayatollah Hashemi Rafsanjani.

The alliance aims to exploit the president's deepening unpopularity, borne of high unemployment, rising inflation and a looming crisis over petrol prices and possible rationing to win control of the Majlis in general elections which are due within 10 months.

Parliament last week voted to curtail Mr Ahmadinejad's term by holding presidential and parliamentary elections simultaneously next year.

Though the move is likely to be vetoed by the hardline Guardian Council, it served notice of mounting disaffection in parliament.

But opposition spokesmen say their broader objective is to bring down the fundamentalist regime by democratic means, transform Iran into a "normal country", and obviate the need for any military or other US and western intervention. Rightwing political and religious forces, divided and dismayed by Mr Ahmadinejad's much-criticised performance, are already mobilising to meet the threat.

The movement amounts to the clearest sign yet within Iran that the country is by no means unified behind a president who has led it into confrontation with the west over the nuclear issue, while presiding over economic decline at home.

"The past two years have been a very bitter time for Iran," said Mohammad Atrianfar, a leading opposition figure with ties to Mr Rafsanjani, the former president now emerging as a likely future kingmaker in Iran.

"Ahmadinejad has done everything upside down - politics, economy, foreign policy - putting all our achievements at risk. He has done a lot of damage at home and abroad."

Mr Atrianfar said that a majority in the Majlis was now critical of the president and would certainly impeach him but for the support he enjoyed from the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

According to Ali Alavi of Siyasat-e Ruz newspaper, some 150 political activists, governors-general, former administration officials and dissident MPs drew up a coalition "victory strategy" at a secretive conference last month presided over by Mr Khatami.

The strategy envisaged "aggravation of the differences among the fundamentalists" and "constant criticism of Ahmadinejad" by "presenting a dark image of the country's affairs," Mr Alavi said.

Opposition sources said that a future reformist-pragmatist government would continue to maintain Iran's claim to nuclear energy and other "national rights" but would seek to settle disputes through talks.

Iran wanted a "normal" relationship with the rest of the world based on mutual respect, the opposition sources said.

In an oblique swipe at Mr Ahmadinejad, Mr Rafsanjani told the weekly Friday prayer meeting in Tehran that the nuclear issue should be settled by negotiations "conducted in a rational atmosphere".

Mr Atrianfar said the economy was the battleground on which Iran's political future would be decided.

The president has faced mounting criticism in recent weeks over high unemployment, especially among younger people, rising inflation and escalating housing costs.

Significantly, for a major oil producer, heavily subsidised petrol prices are due to rise next month, hitting poorer people hardest in a country with poor or non-existent public transport.

"They are playing with fire. Nobody wants to take responsibility for this. It's going to blow up in their faces," said Hussein Dirbaz, a resident of Narmak, the Tehran suburb where Mr Ahmadinejad was brought up.

In an unusual intervention, Grand Ayatollah Yusef Sa'anei, one of Iran's most respected Islamic scholars, has attacked Mr Ahmadinejad's government for failing to tackle social ills such as youth unemployment, drug addiction, and gender inequality.

In a rare interview with a western newspaper at his office in the holy city of Qom, Mr Sa'anei said: "The government should be at the service of the people. But it is putting too much pressure on the people.

"It bans newspapers, sends people to jail, segregates boys and the girls at the universities, makes noise about hijab."

A senior government official said the rising tide of criticism directed at Mr Ahmadinejad was unwarranted. "People say we don't care but that's not true. We've created more credit, more jobs.

"It's too soon to say [Ahmadinejad] has failed. It's too soon to say the reformists will win."

Observers claim that a power struggle is inevitable.

"A very big battle is coming. It's unavoidable," a western diplomat said. "There's a widening gulf between the two sides. There are profound divisions about which way Iran should go. It's going to get very rough."

The looming power struggle could decide whether Iran continues on a path of confrontation with the west or comes in from the cold, the diplomat said.

Inside the struggle for Iran | Iran | Guardian Unlimited

Ahmedinejad is under attack because his belligerency is doing Iran no good and the economic situation is indeed getting tight.

Most Iranians, it appears, are not too happy with the manner in which the govt has handled the nuclear enrichment question and the uncalled for obtuseness.

The local elections has indicated the direction the wind is blowing.

In the next election, Ahmedinejad will get blown away?

I wish our in house Iran expert, Xerxes returns to the forum soon, now that the Persian New Year (Nowroz) is over and it is time to get down to business!

Ray · 05-03-2007, 03:56 AM

Does this not go with the popular sentiment of "Smack That Iran"?!

No comments?

Too brain teasing for the average?

Druze · 05-03-2007, 14:11 PM

I think the state of economy in Iran coupled with a rising population that is anti-government is one of the greatest successes of the Bush administration in the war on terror. The level of risk applied to Iran in Foreign direct Investment has risen to the point where capital is drying up and most of that is due to a very aggressive US sanction campaign against international companies.
The move to rally the nation behind the nucelar program hasn't really gotten people's minds of the economy which is heavily state subsidized in Iran. Their president is a goner.

S-2 · 05-03-2007, 14:37 PM

There remain very powerful entities in Iran who've a vested interest in maintaining a confrontative position with the west- particularly the U.S. None of us want to see airstrikes or war with Iran.

"But opposition spokesmen say their broader objective is to bring down the fundamentalist regime by democratic means, transform Iran into a "normal country", and obviate the need for any military or other US and western intervention."

That would be nice were the cause of a possible western military operation Iran's existing government. It would be nice regardless. However, any military operation by the west, while perhaps targeted broadly, will be a direct response to Iran's nuclear program.

The time-lines are different and compelling. The world may not be able to await the emergance of a democratic Iran which is prepared to cease uranium enrichment. Therein has always lay the problem about the "long" strategy. It's a nascent, dormant movement that offers a minimal liklihood while demanding utter forebearance by the west until it's problematic success is achieved, if achieved at all.

Perhaps, as Druze suggests, sanctions are beginning to have a telling, corrosive, and coercive effect upon Iran's economy. Maybe constricted FDI will dry up available capital. Russia, India, the PRC, and Japan have roles to play here.

If it changes Iran's attitude about nuclear weapons, then it's succeeded amazingly. In the meantime, I shall not hold my breath awaiting the arrival of democracy to Iran nor a fundamental shift in it's view of the United States. It appears that we'll remain enemies for some time to come, IMHO.

**Parihaka** · 05-03-2007, 19:02 PM

Remember that in the last elections the Revolutionary Guard simply banned any moderate candidates. They're not going to let go so easily.

TrueNorth · 08-24-2007, 10:16 AM

There wrere riots in Tehran recently.People burned gas stations because of the high price of fuel. The Iranian people are fed up with Ahmadinejad and his futile posturing.

05-03-2007, 14:37 PM	#4 (permalink)
S-2 *Military Professional* Join Date: 09-11-06 Location: Portland, Oregon Posts: 2,039 Country:	Ray & Druze Reply There remain very powerful entities in Iran who've a vested interest in maintaining a confrontative position with the west- particularly the U.S. None of us want to see airstrikes or war with Iran. "But opposition spokesmen say their broader objective is to bring down the fundamentalist regime by democratic means, transform Iran into a "normal country", and obviate the need for any military or other US and western intervention." That would be nice were the cause of a possible western military operation Iran's existing government. It would be nice regardless. However, any military operation by the west, while perhaps targeted broadly, will be a direct response to Iran's nuclear program. The time-lines are different and compelling. The world may not be able to await the emergance of a democratic Iran which is prepared to cease uranium enrichment. Therein has always lay the problem about the "long" strategy. It's a nascent, dormant movement that offers a minimal liklihood while demanding utter forebearance by the west until it's problematic success is achieved, if achieved at all. Perhaps, as Druze suggests, sanctions are beginning to have a telling, corrosive, and coercive effect upon Iran's economy. Maybe constricted FDI will dry up available capital. Russia, India, the PRC, and Japan have roles to play here. If it changes Iran's attitude about nuclear weapons, then it's succeeded amazingly. In the meantime, I shall not hold my breath awaiting the arrival of democracy to Iran nor a fundamental shift in it's view of the United States. It appears that we'll remain enemies for some time to come, IMHO. __________________ "This aggression will not stand, man!" Jeff Lebowski

05-03-2007, 19:02 PM	#5 (permalink)
Parihaka Moderator Join Date: 11-10-04 Location: Te Ika a Maui Posts: 9,324 Country:	Remember that in the last elections the Revolutionary Guard simply banned any moderate candidates. They're not going to let go so easily. __________________ In the realm of spirit, seek clarity; in the material world, seek utility. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

08-24-2007, 10:16 AM	#6 (permalink)
TrueNorth New Member Join Date: 01-24-07 Location: Toronto, Canada Posts: 15 Country:	There wrere riots in Tehran recently.People burned gas stations because of the high price of fuel. The Iranian people are fed up with Ahmadinejad and his futile posturing. __________________ "Peace, Order and Good Government"

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Lies about the USSR	agent09	The Western Alliance	53	06-06-2008 10:55 AM
US senators call for direct strike inside Pakistan: Pressure tactics may trigger Mush	Tronic	Political Discussions	5	03-04-2007 04:15 AM
Whats going on in northern europe?	Gabru47	Political Discussions	171	10-03-2005 09:28 AM
Human Rights Watch - East Punjab	Sher-e-Punjab	Political Discussions	175	03-29-2005 16:05 PM

05-03-2007, 03:56 AM	#2 (permalink)
Ray Postmaster General *Military Professional* Join Date: 08-20-03 Posts: 25,693 Country:	Does this not go with the popular sentiment of "Smack That Iran"?! No comments? Too brain teasing for the average?

05-03-2007, 14:11 PM	#3 (permalink)
Druze Regular Join Date: 04-23-07 Posts: 90	I think the state of economy in Iran coupled with a rising population that is anti-government is one of the greatest successes of the Bush administration in the war on terror. The level of risk applied to Iran in Foreign direct Investment has risen to the point where capital is drying up and most of that is due to a very aggressive US sanction campaign against international companies. The move to rally the nation behind the nucelar program hasn't really gotten people's minds of the economy which is heavily state subsidized in Iran. Their president is a goner.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)