ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > International Strategic Affairs > The Iranian Question
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 03-23-2007, 18:54 PM   #1 (permalink)
xerxes
Padishah Shahanshah
Senior Contributor
 
xerxes's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-23-07
Location: Canada
Posts: 949
Country:
Iran's president cancels U.N. appearance

Iran's president cancels U.N. appearance

Iran's president cancels U.N. appearance - Yahoo! News

UNITED NATIONS - Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad canceled a trip to New York to address the U.N. Security Council before it votes on whether to impose further sanctions against his country for refusing to stop enriching uranium, a Foreign Ministry spokesman said Friday.

ADVERTISEMENT

The decision came as diplomats from the five veto-wielding members of the Security Council — the U.S., Britain, France, China and Russia — and Germany held a flurry of last-minute negotiations in New York on a draft resolution seeking to pressure Iran to comply.

The six powers want a vote on the resolution by Saturday, but diplomats said that could be delayed by efforts to reach consensus to give the sanctions more weight.

The sanctions, agreed on last week by the six powers, would ban Iranian arms exports and freeze the assets of 28 additional individuals and organizations involved in Iran's nuclear and missile programs. About a third of those are linked to the Revolutionary Guard, an elite military corps.

Ahmadinejad said earlier this month that he wanted to take his case for pursuing nuclear power to the Security Council himself. Earlier Friday, a council diplomat said the Iranian president would arrive in New York at 1 a.m. Saturday, just hours before the council is expected to meet.

But Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Mohammed Ali Hosseini told Iranian state television later in the day that the trip had been scrapped because of "America's obstruction in issuing visas" to the Iranian delegation that was to travel to New York.

Hosseini said that instead of Ahmadinejad, Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki will attend the Security Council meeting and "explain Iran's position regarding its nuclear activities."

"Due to open failure by the United States to issue visas for members of the Iranian delegation accompanying President Ahmadinejad and the air crew, American authorities have effectively prevented President Ahmadinejad from attending the U.N. security council meeting," Hosseini said.

Mohammad Mir Ali Mohammadi, press secretary of Iran's mission at the U.N., told The Associated Press that the U.S. did not deliver a visa to the U.S. Embassy in Bern, Switzerland, in time for Ahmadinejad to pick it up before flying to New York for the Saturday session.

He said Russia and China were trying to postpone the session until Monday and if the session was put off Ahamdinejad would decide whether to come.

Tom Casey, a State Department spokesman, said in Washington that 39 visas had been issued for Ahmadinejad and other Iranian officials and their passports had been returned to Iranian diplomats in Bern by Friday morning. He said another 36 passports with visas were ready later in the day.

The U.S. says Iran's nuclear efforts are cover for a weapons program, but Tehran insists it only wants electricity.

In December, the Security Council voted unanimously to impose limited sanctions on Iran, ordering all countries to stop supplying Iran with materials and technology that could contribute to its nuclear and missile programs and to freeze assets of 10 key Iranian companies and 12 individuals related to those programs. Iran responded by expanding its enrichment program.

Several non-permanent members of the Security Council have resisted the draft resolution, agreed upon last week by the five council powers and Germany.

In an effort to overcome their concerns, Russia proposed a compromise Friday over a proposal by Indonesia and Qatar calling for the Middle East to be free of weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. Including such an appeal could have implications for Israel, a U.S. ally widely believed to possess nuclear weapons, though it has never officially acknowledged it.

The Russian proposal would include a recognition that "a solution to the Iranian nuclear issue would contribute global non-proliferation efforts, including those in the Middle East."

France and Britain approved of the wording, while the United States was considering it, said Axel Crau, a spokesman for France's U.N. mission.

"It's definitely a key point and probably the key to unanimity," Crau said.

He said the resolution's co-sponsors — France, Germany and Britain — still wanted to call a vote Saturday but may delay it to seek consensus. "For the sake of unanimity we are willing to make some efforts because unanimity has a value," he said.

Alejandro Wolff, the acting U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, said the nuclear debate should not be affected by the Iranian seizure of 15 British sailors and marines in the Persian Gulf Friday.
__________________
If we contrast the rapid progress of this mischievous discovery of gunpowder with the slow and laborious advances of reason, science, and the arts of peace, a philosopher, according to his temper, will laugh or weep at the folly of mankind. - Edward Gibbon
xerxes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2007, 18:56 PM   #2 (permalink)
xerxes
Padishah Shahanshah
Senior Contributor
 
xerxes's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-23-07
Location: Canada
Posts: 949
Country:
Could it be a split within A-jad own camp, one within-faction capturing 15 British therefore negating anything that A-jad has to say??? the capture of 15 Brits could be a politcal coup d'etat by his own Sepah people against him ...
xerxes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2007, 13:46 PM   #3 (permalink)
ExNavyAmerican
Military Professional
 
ExNavyAmerican's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-02-07
Location: Ningbo, China
Posts: 827
Country:
I heard it was because of the visas-and I wouldn't be surprised if that was the case. But I wouldn't blame Washington if they did dither with the entry visas: we have enough slime in the country already: the liberals, and democrats!
__________________
"I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that His justice cannot sleep forever."
- Thomas Jefferson
ExNavyAmerican is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2007, 13:47 PM   #4 (permalink)
xerxes
Padishah Shahanshah
Senior Contributor
 
xerxes's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-23-07
Location: Canada
Posts: 949
Country:
I am not sure, just a few days ago his Visa was passed
xerxes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2007, 16:24 PM   #5 (permalink)
Parihaka
Moderator
 
Parihaka's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-10-04
Location: Te Ika a Maui
Posts: 9,324
Country:
I think he's too nervous to leave Iran: there's no way a showboater like him would pass up the opportunity for international coverage unless it were something critical.
__________________
In the realm of spirit, seek clarity; in the material world, seek utility.
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
Parihaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2007, 01:31 AM   #6 (permalink)
ExNavyAmerican
Military Professional
 
ExNavyAmerican's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-02-07
Location: Ningbo, China
Posts: 827
Country:
Maybe he's worried about being taken hostage as a result of the British sailors being taken. That's what the Saudis did when Iran took Saudis hostage. I'd certainly take him hostage, but I suppose we'll have to settle for his FM.

Last edited by ExNavyAmerican : 03-25-2007 at 01:33 AM.
ExNavyAmerican is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2007, 03:51 AM   #7 (permalink)
smilingassassin
Senior Contributor
 
smilingassassin's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-12-03
Location: Vancouver Canada
Posts: 2,706
Country:
The news is that it was indeed the issue of Visa's, Iran decided to add additional personel (security IIRC) to the trip which delayed the Visa aplications for this second batch of aplicants.
__________________
Facts to a liberal is like Kryptonite to Superman.

-- Larry Elder
smilingassassin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2007, 07:21 AM   #8 (permalink)
ExNavyAmerican
Military Professional
 
ExNavyAmerican's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-02-07
Location: Ningbo, China
Posts: 827
Country:
Quote:
The news is that it was indeed the issue of Visa's, Iran decided to add additional personel (security IIRC) to the trip which delayed the Visa aplications for this second batch of aplicants.
If that is indeed the case, then Ahmadinejad is being purely pychotic about the visas. He is just trying to build up for a showdown, and show how evil the United States is.
ExNavyAmerican is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2007, 10:26 AM   #9 (permalink)
Dreadnought
Senior Contributor
 
Dreadnought's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Posts: 5,199
Country:
Ask yourself how would the U.S. look as being the U.N. host if we denied him access to speak for his country. Access IMO wasnt denied as they have been very few of these cases if any in the past. Its all political ploy with whats going on. We (U.S.) dont fear him speaking thats exactly what the U.N. is there for. If anybody does it should be his own country for his idealisms.
__________________
Fortitude.....The strength to persist...The courage to endure.
Dreadnought is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2007, 15:08 PM   #10 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,089
Country:
"What's the matter, colonel Sanders? Chicken?"
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The B-70 and the fight btw Kennedy/Vinson Anon Military Aviation 4 11-06-2006 10:11 AM
Why use force when talk works so well? Leader International Defense Topics 54 12-05-2005 04:29 AM
Why We Are in Iraq Leader The War in Iraq 107 12-16-2004 21:23 PM
A Preemptive Attack on Iran's Nuclear Facilities: Possible Consequences lulldapull International Defense Topics 14 11-20-2004 16:27 PM
UN coverup of Oil for Food scandal Anon Political Discussions 0 06-01-2004 10:34 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:19 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8