ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > International Strategic Affairs > The Iranian Question
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 03-30-2007, 15:53 PM   #301 (permalink)
Bluesman
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Bluesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Vacaville, CA.
Posts: 7,514
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by SRB View Post
To me this is very strange situation.

To me apology is stupid demand if Iran wanted to be jack they just could say we return your sailors and for god sake learn them to use instruments. This action is good if Iran lies or telling truth. Now to me it look very stupid what A-jad work.
You're seeing it through the eyes of a rational actor, and as such, you'd be right, and that would be a good move. That's not what Iran is, though.
__________________
"The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it, and if one finds the prospect of a long war intolerable, it is natural to disbelieve in the possibility of victory."
- George Orwell
Bluesman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2007, 19:31 PM   #302 (permalink)
Parihaka
Moderator
 
Parihaka's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-10-04
Location: Te Ika a Maui
Posts: 9,961
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray View Post
Parihaka,

I deplore the capture of the British sailors.

Loathsome.

However, this Left and Right is a strawman argument (that is if I have understood what is strawman argument since it is an Americanism). It is no rationale to debunk an argument. Debunk it with facts and not with populist cliches of WAB. Does not cut ice.

To be fair and not losing sight of the reality of the situation, Iran has done this because the US captured their 'diplomats' in Kurd area and they were helping the Kurds against the Sunnis as per the Iraqi govt (thread available on WAB).

Therefore, if one wears the Iranian boot, they have taken 'military action' in a tit for tat basis! I am sure the Iranian web warriors were equally outraged when their 'diplomats' were captured and were baying for Coalition blood as we are baying for theirs for capturing the British sailors.

Notwithstanding, I am indignant at the capture of the sailors. I am indignant because as far as I know the capture was on the Iraqi side of the waterway. It is an illegal action. It is violation of international laws to abduct anyone from foreign waters and the British sailors were on the Iraqi side, notwithstanding what the lady sailor I believe has said.

What UN mandate on which this Iraq War being fought?
I too made the assumption that it was tit-for-tat for the Americans taking the undercover Sepah-e Pasdaran Colonel, presumably there to supply the non-existant Iranian support for the irhabis.
The Iranian foreign office denies there is any connection, but as we both know this is a Sepah-e Pasdaran operation, and they seem to be taking over if not already in full control. I think the only reason the supreme council and westernised institutions still exist there is as a smokescreen to confuse the west.
I don't however hold with the idea that because the US took the Sepah-e Pasdaran Colonel and his fellow spies, that therefore the west is hypocritical in being outraged at the British soldiers and sailors arrests.

As for my contempt for the loonie lefties, I have equal contempt for the extreme right, it's simply the loonie left have more control over the media at the moment. As I say, where is the outrage in our press, or don't these soldiers and sailors count?
__________________
In the realm of spirit, seek clarity; in the material world, seek utility.
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
Parihaka is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2007, 19:47 PM   #303 (permalink)
YellowFever
Contributor
 
YellowFever's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-17-06
Location: In front of my computer...duh!
Posts: 502
Quote:
Originally Posted by xerxes View Post
Hello YellowFever



As far as I know the things I support in case of Iran is not to support regime change and the nuclear issue.

As far Iran's help to Hamas. I deeply oppose that because I never liked those people (personnal thing), while at the sametime I recognize the presence of Israel cages. As far Iran not reconizing Israel, I oppose that. It shear stupidity. Though, I will point out that US did not recognize China (PRC) from 1948 till 1972. So technically there is nothing wrong with that, but I dont support it. As far A-jad having conferances on Jewish holocaust, I recognize that it is done purely for propoganda means to shore up support from Sunni nations (Arabs). You may or may not know this, most people in Iran dont give a *** about Israel/Palestine. It is not our concern - Culturally. I believe deep down the raision d'etre of Palestinean state, is the existance of Israel. Had Israel never came to existance, Palestinean would have surely been eaten up by Jordan or else.

All this being said, it is obvious to me - as an amateur historian - that all nations use ideology to spread their influence. US-led invasion of Iraq was launched on platform to spread democarcy. Iran's activities in Lebenon and Iraq is supported by the Shia ideology of brotherhood or wharever that means. I recognize that at the end, it is all BS and it is only meant to further to nationalists intrest of a nation - wether it be China, States, South Africa or Iran. To me, Iran defacto influence and presense in Lebenon is no different then legitimite/recognized US presence in form of Malaki's dejure state in Iraq.

Hope this helps. Any other question please PM me, I am done with this thread.
It did help.

Thanks.

And I'm sorry I kinda jumped all over you.
__________________
...If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space!
YellowFever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2007, 19:50 PM   #304 (permalink)
YellowFever
Contributor
 
YellowFever's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-17-06
Location: In front of my computer...duh!
Posts: 502
[quote=glyn;360351]
Quote:
Originally Posted by YellowFever View Post
And probably if you try to see the world as black and white as well as grey instead of just seeing it as all grey, you might understand where I'M coming from.

(Damn...this sounds like an argument I had with glyn way back when..LoL.)

You have just reminded me of that, so I have looked up our correspondence to get the facts. I was saying that we were so close to agreement we were like kindred spirits, but you replied


We are nowhere near being kindred spirits if you really believe you were lied to my your leaders and ours.

Which took me aback, rather, but I was having computer trouble at the time, so couldn't finish the business at hand. Now 6 months or so down the line I can state that if the subject came up for discussion again, I would still hold the same view. In fact I would probably state it more forcefully than before. We are talking of events of 60 years ago, and we are patriotic people who will stand up for our country, serve it and even die for it, but I'm buggered if I'll believe that governments don't feed us propaganda, which is much the same thing.
Peace, brother. I hope your fever has abated

LoL....after reading your posts for the past few months, I came to realize that we are sorta, kinda, maybe, somewhat, even likely kindred spirits on many issues.

And I'm also sorry I also sorta kinda jumped all over you way back when, too.

Peace!
YellowFever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2007, 21:24 PM   #305 (permalink)
Trooth
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 11-23-03
Posts: 2,110
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
Ever noticed that captured western soldiers are usually forced to read a confession letter or an appeal letter on the air stating they're sorry or they condemn the military action or whatever. Do the captors think anyone in the west will actually buy this crap? Even the leftists in the west can see bullcrap for what it is. They just don't come out and say it. Who or what is their target audience? Their own people?
It is for their own people. It is all part of an exercise in "demonstrating" a the harsh "facts" to the people of Iran, to help prepare them for the hardships that may lay ahead. Essentially what Iran is orchestrating is:-

1) That the west is actively oppressing Iran. They have heard how the west wants to stop Iran developing technically, to provide for its own energy needs and to be able to diversify away from oil and towards a peaceful nuclear programme.
2) That the west would not trust it with nuclear weapons. Of course Tehran has no intention of building any but to the average Iranian why should they not be able to defend themselves? All things being equal (which they are not) it's a reasonable question.
3) That the great enemy of Iran is on the border (US/UK in Iraq) that the US has labelled Iran an enemy and named its allies (Axis of Evil) and invaded one of those allies (Iraq).
4) That Iran must be strong (but of course civilised) in its steadfast defence of its soverignty by keeping its borders completely secure - by detaining armed foreign military personnel that "clearly" were spying or otherwise up to no good in its waters.
5) That if proof of 4 was needed here it is - the foriegn invaders themselves say that were indeed in Iranian waters. They have been well treated of course, because Tehran is civilised and peaceful.

So if Tehran is doing well with 4 ("We got them"), and 3 is largely self evident, then the west is wrong about 1. But, on reflection, Iranian's need a nuclear deterrant so maybe 2 is reasonable and something worth fighting for. Everyone is against them. The West has brought this on itself.

etc.

Now, if the RAF was to bomb some military targets, it would only "prove" Tehran right. It would not make the Iranians question the detaining of the sailors/marines, nor the nuclear programme. Hence why it is currently being done on a diplomatic basis.
Trooth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2007, 23:24 PM   #306 (permalink)
smilingassassin
Senior Contributor
 
smilingassassin's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-12-03
Location: Vancouver Canada
Posts: 2,750
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreadnought View Post
Ray, Sir

Are you suggesting Italian frogmen reminescent of WWII?
I've always liked that idea, sink their ships in harbour inflicting humiliation upon the enemy and showing him he is not imune from our intentions even in his own harbours. Not sure how secure a sufacing boomer would be in the Persian gulf but that would also send a signal.
__________________
Facts to a liberal is like Kryptonite to Superman.

-- Larry Elder
smilingassassin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2007, 01:18 AM   #307 (permalink)
Parihaka
Moderator
 
Parihaka's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-10-04
Location: Te Ika a Maui
Posts: 9,961
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trooth View Post
etc.

Now, if the RAF was to bomb some military targets, it would only "prove" Tehran right. It would not make the Iranians question the detaining of the sailors/marines, nor the nuclear programme. Hence why it is currently being done on a diplomatic basis.
So the British shouldn't do anything because, well, the Iranians might not like it?
Parihaka is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2007, 03:12 AM   #308 (permalink)
Danielk
Regular
 
Join Date: 04-17-06
Location: Australia
Posts: 58
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trooth View Post
It is for their own people. It is all part of an exercise in "demonstrating" a the harsh "facts" to the people of Iran, to help prepare them for the hardships that may lay ahead. Essentially what Iran is orchestrating is:-

1) That the west is actively oppressing Iran. They have heard how the west wants to stop Iran developing technically, to provide for its own energy needs and to be able to diversify away from oil and towards a peaceful nuclear programme.
2) That the west would not trust it with nuclear weapons. Of course Tehran has no intention of building any but to the average Iranian why should they not be able to defend themselves? All things being equal (which they are not) it's a reasonable question.
3) That the great enemy of Iran is on the border (US/UK in Iraq) that the US has labelled Iran an enemy and named its allies (Axis of Evil) and invaded one of those allies (Iraq).
4) That Iran must be strong (but of course civilised) in its steadfast defence of its soverignty by keeping its borders completely secure - by detaining armed foreign military personnel that "clearly" were spying or otherwise up to no good in its waters.
5) That if proof of 4 was needed here it is - the foriegn invaders themselves say that were indeed in Iranian waters. They have been well treated of course, because Tehran is civilised and peaceful.

So if Tehran is doing well with 4 ("We got them"), and 3 is largely self evident, then the west is wrong about 1. But, on reflection, Iranian's need a nuclear deterrant so maybe 2 is reasonable and something worth fighting for. Everyone is against them. The West has brought this on itself.

etc.

Now, if the RAF was to bomb some military targets, it would only "prove" Tehran right. It would not make the Iranians question the detaining of the sailors/marines, nor the nuclear programme. Hence why it is currently being done on a diplomatic basis.
You really believe the nuclear programme is for peacefull purposes? Iran supports terrorists, full stop.

And you believe the briton's were in iranian waters? They showed a GPS map that they were in Iraq waters...

The RAF has every right to bomb iranian targets or get the soldiers back if iran doesent want to give them back.

Dont let the Iranian propaganda fool you sir.
Danielk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2007, 03:28 AM   #309 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 10,207
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trooth View Post
3) That the great enemy of Iran is on the border (US/UK in Iraq) that the US has labelled Iran an enemy and named its allies (Axis of Evil) and invaded one of those allies (Iraq).
Don't they know that if Iraq develops in a peaceful manner, we would pack up and leave? We don't want to be there. We're there because it's an unstable region. We don't like unstable regions. That's why we're there.

Iran is free to acquire whatever conventional weapons it wants and nuclear plants too, just don't scream about killing jews everyday.

A stable region with no one screaming about wiping someone else off the map is all we ask.
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.
gunnut is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2007, 03:44 AM   #310 (permalink)
SRB
Contributor
 
SRB's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-19-06
Location: Belgrade
Posts: 414
Country:
Territorial waters are complicated stuff in world. I will point out Croatia-Slovenia problem territorial water disputation this type of problem is common at states which are in some world gulf.
GPS isnt any proof it could trickery. If some other country watch that Persian gulf in that time (and it isnt UK, US or China) and it have pictures of position of UK boat than we could judge. Blair lied many time in his rule.

BUT IT IS IRRELEVANT WERE BOAT WAS. IRAN NEED TO LET THOSE GUYS BECAUSE THEY WERENT ON SOME SECRET MISSION AND THEZ WERENT THREAT TO IRAN SECURITY.
AND AGAIN IRAN NEVER SAD THAT THERE IS POSSIBILITY THAT IRAN NAVY MADE MISTAKE? Did they done any investigating? NO. Did they give any evidence that UK boat was in their waters? NO.
They know who they hunt which say me that they plan operation and because that and two NO I belive that UK telling the truth.

And what about corruption in Iran? It seem that A-jad dont do nothing about that. He just talk about wiping Israel for map and about Iran nuclear program and he win election on anti-corruption program.
CLASSIC EXAMPLE OF DEMAGOGY
SRB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2007, 04:51 AM   #311 (permalink)
YellowFever
Contributor
 
YellowFever's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-17-06
Location: In front of my computer...duh!
Posts: 502
Tigger...

Tigger.....

You know I agree with you concerning the Royal Marines held hostage is Iran.

But the more and more I hear the sound bites coming out of London, the more and more I'm losing faith in you guys.

By the way, going off at a tangent, how well is the Royal Navy equipped to use military force against Iran if the situation deterioriates further?

I'm not up to speed on the Royal Navy.....
YellowFever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2007, 06:07 AM   #312 (permalink)
Commando
Contributor
 
Join Date: 01-01-05
Posts: 412
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by SRB View Post
Territorial waters are complicated stuff in world. I will point out Croatia-Slovenia problem territorial water disputation this type of problem is common at states which are in some world gulf.
GPS isnt any proof it could trickery. If some other country watch that Persian gulf in that time (and it isnt UK, US or China) and it have pictures of position of UK boat than we could judge. Blair lied many time in his rule.

BUT IT IS IRRELEVANT WERE BOAT WAS. IRAN NEED TO LET THOSE GUYS BECAUSE THEY WERENT ON SOME SECRET MISSION AND THEZ WERENT THREAT TO IRAN SECURITY.
AND AGAIN IRAN NEVER SAD THAT THERE IS POSSIBILITY THAT IRAN NAVY MADE MISTAKE? Did they done any investigating? NO. Did they give any evidence that UK boat was in their waters? NO.
They know who they hunt which say me that they plan operation and because that and two NO I belive that UK telling the truth.

And what about corruption in Iran? It seem that A-jad dont do nothing about that. He just talk about wiping Israel for map and about Iran nuclear program and he win election on anti-corruption program.
CLASSIC EXAMPLE OF DEMAGOGY
totally agree with you mate
Commando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2007, 07:34 AM   #313 (permalink)
Ray
Postmaster General
Military Professional
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 28,236
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreadnought View Post
Ray, Sir

Are you suggesting Italian frogmen reminescent of WWII?
And Limpet mines!
__________________


"Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

HAKUNA MATATA
Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2007, 08:01 AM   #314 (permalink)
Ray
Postmaster General
Military Professional
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 28,236
Country:
Parihaka,

Have faith in the British.

I know they are upsetting the gung ho types.

Remember the British did not rule more than half the world because they were the gung ho hell for leather types.

They will have their cake and eat it.

Give them time.
Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2007, 13:07 PM   #315 (permalink)
JMH
Regular
 
Join Date: 01-24-07
Location: Alexandria and Everett and various other locations.
Posts: 117
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garry View Post
I am sorry man, but your are so brainwhashed that it really stinks. Why don't you go to Afghanistan pushtu areas to fight Taliban.... or Bagdad streets? Don't waste your time here man!!! Fight is waiting for you! Go build democracy in Kabul

try to understand that Iran is DIFFERENT reality than what you've been taught domestically. And it does not need to change they way you want... world is so diverse that you can not even immagine....

Best way to fight brainwashing - go on travel... they you would get much better understanding fo the world compared to that from Fox News and CNN (two most brainwashing channels). You might come to same conclusions as you have now... but this time it would be your OWN
What do you know of Afghanistan? Have you ever been to Afghanistan? Have you ever seen first hand, the ravaged, destroyed country of Afghanistan?
Have you walked through the streets of Kabul? Have you seen Kandahar? Have you seen the Pakistani-Afghan border region? Do you have any idea what you are talking about?
Have you spoken to any real Afghan citizens, the poor people who desperately try to survive in the face unimaginable odds, that hardly anyone in the west can comprehend? Have you worked with or done anything to help any Afghan person in Afghanistan?

I have and I have seen and see Afghanistan far more clearly than you do and ever could care to see.

The same poison of Sharia law that further devastated Afghanistan after the terrible Soviet Occupation of Afghanistan is the same law that the Iranian Government uses to suppress the Iranian people. If you could see the children in Afghanistan with their eager hope, and hunger for education than you would see the key to the defeat of the Islamic Fascists.
These Islamic Fascists use terror forces such as the Taliban, Revolutionary Guard, Hamas and other terror groups’ throughout the world (Eritrea, Ethiopia, Sudan, Somalia, Indonesia, Pakistan, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Thailand, Philippines, Lebanon, Gaza Strip, Syria, Saudia Arabia etc.) to spread their terror, enforced under the code of Sharia Law. Education, freedom, democracy and economic empowerment of oppressed people are the best ways to defeat the Islamic Fascists.

Last edited by JMH : 03-31-2007 at 13:54 PM.
JMH is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Britain Appeals To UN In Sailors' Case Ironduke International Politics 338 04-23-2007 16:24 PM
Battleship History Article rickusn Battleships Forum 3 01-17-2007 11:16 AM
Al Qaeda Declines in Northern Iraq, Military Officer Says Shek The War in Iraq 6 09-16-2005 19:03 PM
Future of afghanistan raja khan Operation Enduring Freedom 113 09-20-2004 19:23 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:02 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8