![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Senior Contributor
|
Iran to buy Indian radars to protect nuke sites
http://www.iranian.ws/iran_news/publ...cle_3901.shtml
Iran seeks Indian radar system Sep 26, 2004, 17:00 Iran is negotiating with India to buy advanced radar system to protect its nuclear weapons facilities. The Untied States is closely monitoring the potential deal. Industry sources on Saturday said New Delhi has been considering an Iranian request for an upgraded Western- origin radar systems. They said the systems are designed for fire control and surveillance of anti-aircraft batteries. Iran is seeking an unspecified number of Upgraded Support Fledermaus radar systems from the Indian state-owned Bharat Electronics Ltd, or BEL. The deal could reach $ 70 million and mark the first major defence agreement between New Delhi and Tehran since they signed a defence cooperation pact in 2002. The government in New Delhi has been examining the Iranian request for about a year now. Tehran has relayed two separate requests for the upgraded radar systems. Industry sources said New Delhi has been under pressure form the United States not to sell the radars to Iran. The United States has determined that the request is part of Irans military effort to protect its nuclear weapons facilities. Iran already employs Soviet-origin anti-aircraft systems around the Bushehr nuclear reactor. It has already been a client of BEL in 2001, the Indian company sold Teheran components for sonar systems deployed by the Iranian navy. The 2002 defence cooperation pact between New Delhi and Teheran was meant to pave the way for Indian upgrades and maintenance of Irans navy. The Upgraded Super Fledermaus is a monopulse radar used in 35-mm air defence batteries and designed to detect low-flying objects, such as unmanned air vehicles. The digital system contains a but-in simulator as well as a signal jammer. BEL has confirmed Irans request for the upgraded radar. Executives said Iran has sought the same fire control and surveillance radar that the company upgraded for the Indian Army in 2001. The Super Fledermaus was acquired in the early 1980s and produced by BEL under licence from the radars designer Ericsson Radar Electronics |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Tamizhanban
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
Dont worry, we dont have rougue scientists in India, who travels to other countries in chartered planes to sell nuclear bomb materials. We are not that advanced. Everything comes under a civilian govt, not under a dictator with sweeping powers, they are accountable and responsible for every one of their actions and they cannot hold tight any secrets like this one, coz its transparent and its a coalition of different parties.
__________________
A grain of wheat eclipsed the sun of Adam !! Last edited by Jay : 10-01-2004 at 19:27 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Tamizhanban
Senior Contributor
|
USA to ease curbs on supply of N-equipment
ISRO to be removed from ban list T.N. Parasuram Washington, September 18 Ahead of the first-ever meeting between Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and President George W. Bush, the USA has eased restrictions on the supply of equipment and technology for India’s civilian space and nuclear programmes, which included removing ISRO from a prohibition list, clearing a major obstacle in Indo-US strategic ties. The decision was taken during the talks between Foreign Secretary Shyam Saran and US officials, including Under-Secretary of State for Political Affairs Marc Grossman here. “The first phase in the next steps in strategic partnership (NSSP) is, of course, lays stress on the space side. When we get into the second face, it will be focused perhaps a little more on the nuclear stage,” Mr Saran told reporters yesterday. “This,” he said, “is a very important agreement that has been concluded today. We are very happy to have this on the eve of the meeting between President Bush and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.” The two leaders are meeting on September 21 in New York on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly. A joint press statement issued on the talks Mr Saran had with US officials said “since January, the two governments have worked closely together to conclude Phase One of the NSSP. This includes the implementation of measures to address proliferation concerns and ensure compliance with US export controls.” These modification, including removing the ISRO from the Department of Commerce Entity List, are fully consistent with US non-proliferation laws, obligations, and objectives. It says the USA and India will continue to move forward under the NSSP and have a joint implementation group for this purpose. During the talks with the Bush administration officials, the Indian Foreign Secretary met Deputy National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley, Under Secretary for Commerce (Industry and Security) Kenneth Juster, Under Secretary of State for Global Affairs Paula Dobriansky, and Under Secretary (Policy) in the Defence Department Douglas Feith. — PTI who wants crow soup?? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Postmaster General
Military Professional
|
Heavens.
Isn't this already in the Asia section? How many places must the same post be posted? This has been posted as post #49 in Indo - Iranian special strategis relationship & partnership. And now it features here. This is most juvenile. Let's post under one thread in one of the sections and then let the discussion go on. Or else we will be posting our same reply all over the forum!
__________________
![]() "Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination." I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to. HAKUNA MATATA Last edited by Ray : 10-02-2004 at 10:54 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Postmaster General
Military Professional
|
Anyway, the automatic anti-aircraft artillery batteries (five actually) are equipped with radar-guided 40 mm guns. The Super-Fledermaus fire control systems are in the process of being replaced by PEAB radar systems. Hence is obsolescent.
These are used for 'one point' AD cover and are used for low flying and generally slow flying aircraft or UAV. BTW, Indian Army's ageing 40mm Bofors L-40/60s are held in storage - though some have found their way into the Indian Navy and Coast Guard. Last edited by Ray : 10-02-2004 at 10:55 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Postmaster General
Military Professional
|
Lunatok,
The Prime Minister is not Vajpayee, it is Manmohan Singh - the magic of the ballot! Here one day, gone the next! ![]() So ringing up Vajpayee will only help him to laugh up his sleeve! A radar and that too obsolescent does not contribute in any way in the process to make a nuclear bomb, as a rifle would not contribute to the process of nculear fission or fusion! |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Staff Emeritus
|
Quote:
That radar won't help build the nukes per se...but it will make it tought to knock out the plants. If America doesn't, then Israel certainly will. Otherwise everyone in downtown Tel Aviv will start emitting a healthy green glow. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Military Enthusiast
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
What about N. Korea? As far as I am concerned, Bush and his quote can go to hell when it comes to India's security considerations and interests. We have seen so many times USA acting contrary to India's security interests and yet claim that USA is a friend of India. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Staff Emeritus
|
Quote:
__________________
No man is free until all men are free - John Hossack I agree completely with this Administration’s goal of a regime change in Iraq-John Kerry even if that enforcement is mostly at the hands of the United States, a right we retain even if the Security Council fails to act-John Kerry He may even miscalculate and slide these weapons off to terrorist groups to invite them to be a surrogate to use them against the United States. It’s the miscalculation that poses the greatest threat-John Kerry |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Postmaster General
Military Professional
|
Quote:
40mm AD guns are obsolete practically. It is good for UAV and slow aircraft. We have just FIVE batteries! In today's world of BVR (Beyond Visual Range), Stand Off Capability (where the aircraft locks on beyond Air Defence range) and fires the munition and flips back home, Laser designators, it is only a silly joe who will do a LO Lo Lo configuration attack. Not that it is off the tactics book I will also say. Therefore, this radar is just a placebo. And to imagine such a lot of brouhaha! It is OK for the media and the Mullahmen, but not for those who understand the military! I am sure that Iran would not be stupid to build nukes. It would not be in their interest. Last edited by Ray : 10-02-2004 at 16:07 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Staff Emeritus
|
Quote:
Second part makes sense. It seemed rather irkfull that India would be helping Iran out with the much talked about Nuke plants. But they really wouldn't make taking out a reactor by either America or Israel as dangerous as it sounded at first. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Banished
Senior Contributor
|
Advanced radar system????
LOL! I wonder if India will lease them one of their Phalcons!! That wouldn't be too nice. I hope Pakistan doesn't go ahead and share theirs AWACS whenever we get em, its best not to get entangled with the next upcomming biggest conflict... I don't think that would protect the Iranians from a missile strike either, but it will help move their mobile launchers here n there.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Pakistan ,Two Nation Theory and a few lies | Samudra | Warfare in the Modern Age | 131 | 01-11-2008 05:16 AM |
| Iran And Possible Developments | Gazi | The Iranian Question | 2 | 02-26-2006 12:02 PM |
| Russia says opposes use of force against Iran | Alamgir | The Iranian Question | 34 | 09-29-2005 04:39 AM |
| An Article worthy of Lull..... | MIKEMUN | Political Discussions | 2 | 03-18-2005 20:04 PM |
| Iran and the Bomb | tarek | The Iranian Question | 0 | 11-07-2004 00:44 AM |