ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > International Strategic Affairs > The Iranian Question
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 09-06-2006, 19:46 PM   #1 (permalink)
Parihaka
Moderator
 
Parihaka's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-10-04
Location: Te Ika a Maui
Posts: 9,466
Country:
Iran Cultural Revolution Urged

Quote:
6.9.2006. 19:23:32


RELATED STORIES
- Bush: strong words on Iran

Iran's hard-line president has called on students to push for a purge of liberal and secular university teachers, in what's being seen as another sign of his determination to strengthen Islamic fundamentalism in the country.

Analysts say that Mr Ahmadinejad appears determined to remake Iran by reviving the fundamentalist goals pursued under the republic's late founder, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini.

The Iranian president’s call to students echoes the rhetoric of the nation's 1979 Islamic revolution in a bid to weaken the power of Iran’s strong moderate factions.

Since taking office a year ago Mr Ahmadinejad has moved to replace pragmatic veterans in the government and diplomatic corps with former military commanders and inexperienced religious hard-liners.

His administration also has launched crackdowns on independent journalists, websites and bloggers.

Speaking to a group of students in Tehran, Mr Ahmadinejad called on them to pressure his administration to keep driving out moderate instructors, a process that began earlier this year.

Dozens of liberal university professors and teachers were sent into retirement this year after Mr Ahmadinejad's administration named the first cleric to head Tehran University.

Reforms difficult

The country's oldest institution of higher education remains home to dozens more professors and instructors who outspokenly oppose policies that restrict freedom of expression.

"Today, students should shout at the president and ask why liberal and secular university lecturers are present in the universities," the official Islamic Republic News Agency quoted Mr Ahmadinejad as saying during a meeting with students.

The president complained that reforms in the country's universities were difficult to accomplish and that the educational system had been affected by secularism for the last 150 years. But, he added: "Such a change has begun."

It was not clear if Mr Ahmadinejad intended to take immediate specific measures, or if he was just urging the students to rally.

Mr Ahmadinejad, in his role as head of the country's Council of Cultural Revolution, would have the authority to make such changes himself.

But his comments seemed designed to encourage hard-line students to begin a pressure campaign on their own, thus putting a squeeze on universities.

"This is the beginning of a so-called cultural revolution. Ahmadinejad and his allies plan to sweep their opponents from the universities," said Saeed Al-e Agha, a Tehran University professor. "They want to rule the brains of youth there.”

“Ahmadinejad wants to settle scores with the most important centre of critics and opposition and close the door to any opponent before municipal elections in late November," said Kouhyar Goodarzi, a human rights activist. "But his move may prompt a new round of student unrest."

Liberal and secular professors teach at universities around the country, but they are a minority.

Most are politically passive and do not identify with either the hard-liners or the liberal camp.
Source
The monotony of these same events occuring time and time again through history is becoming depressing.
__________________
In the realm of spirit, seek clarity; in the material world, seek utility.
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
Parihaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2006, 16:54 PM   #2 (permalink)
Ray
Postmaster General
Military Professional
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 26,149
Country:
The Ninja turtle is getting too stupid and archaic in thoughts.
__________________


"Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

HAKUNA MATATA
Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2006, 18:39 PM   #3 (permalink)
Amled
Senior Contributor
 
Amled's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-10-04
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,436
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by parihaka View Post
The monotony of these same events occuring time and time again through history is becoming depressing.
So depressingly true.

Quote:
We learn from history that we learn nothing from history!
George Bernard Shaw
__________________
When we blindly adopt a religion, a political system, a literary dogma, we become automatons. We cease to grow. - Anais Nin
Amled is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2006, 21:38 PM   #4 (permalink)
Tronic
Navajo Code Talker
Senior Contributor
 
Tronic's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-27-04
Location: Patiala, India
Posts: 5,288
Country:
nah people... at the end, i'm sure the Iranian people will be victorious....
__________________
Nabha Sparasham Deeptam
-Touch The Sky With Glory
Tronic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2006, 07:30 AM   #5 (permalink)
Amled
Senior Contributor
 
Amled's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-10-04
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,436
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tronic View Post
nah people... at the end, i'm sure the Iranian people will be victorious....
That’s a pretty broad statement my friend.
What segment of the Iranian people do you see as coming out victorious?
The theocrats as represented by Ahmadinejad and his cronies who are inspired by their iconic saint, the late; and unlamented proponent of bestiality and paedophilia, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. Or the increasingly hounded and persecuted segment that wish to effectuate a more liberal and democratic way of life in Iran?
Right now the former seems to have more wind in the sails.
Amled is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2006, 08:36 AM   #6 (permalink)
Ray
Postmaster General
Military Professional
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 26,149
Country:
Iranian people will surely come out victorious.

All power to them.

But surely not the theocratic mish mash that rules Iran as of date.

The Shias are the more progressive of the Islamic people and more pragmatic. They have Ijtihad as a tenet, but not the Sunnis.

The Mad Mullahs are having their two minutes worth of glory and defiance in the name of Allah, but all that will fade when God's truth dawns on these mad men that hold Iran in hostage to their mad ways.
Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2006, 10:54 AM   #7 (permalink)
Amled
Senior Contributor
 
Amled's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-10-04
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,436
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray View Post
Iranian people will surely come out victorious.

All power to them.

But surely not the theocratic mish mash that rules Iran as of date.

The Shias are the more progressive of the Islamic people and more pragmatic. They have Ijtihad as a tenet, but not the Sunnis.

The Mad Mullahs are having their two minutes worth of glory and defiance in the name of Allah, but all that will fade when God's truth dawns on these mad men that hold Iran in hostage to their mad ways.
Ray, I applaud your faith in that reason and sanity will be win out in Iran, even though I don’t share your optimistic hopes.
I sincerely hope that you are correct and I am wrong, but I feel that course laid out by Ahmadinejad and the Mad Mullahs will be dominant; at least for the foreseeable future.
Don’t forget that; and here I’ll give them the benefit of a doubt, that they are following the dictates of their God and beliefs as they see it.
A viewpoint that makes them very dangerous indeed, far more so then AQ and Usama in the long run, as they will have the resources and manpower of an entire nation state behind them. This especially if they manage to stifle the nascent dissent that is present in segments of the Iranian population, maybe the reason for the crackdown underway, which is referred to in this thread.
Don’t forget Ray, that the USSR and the dogmatic belief system it had as its core lasted for nigh on to 80 years.
This in spite of the fact that the belief system was flawed and in the long course unworkable, yet the powers-that-were in the old USSR clung to power and in their wake were the cause of untold misery.
Whereas in Iran we are dealing with a belief that has at its core not just a political belief but one founded in religion, therefore of much more potency.
Amled is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2006, 13:01 PM   #8 (permalink)
Tronic
Navajo Code Talker
Senior Contributor
 
Tronic's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-27-04
Location: Patiala, India
Posts: 5,288
Country:
If the Iranian people are suppressed to a point where they loose their voice, then I will support an American attack on Iran to topple the Mullahs... I pray that the Iranian people do rise against the Mullahs and bring power to the people... if they don't then America should defenitely attack.... but I very much doubt America will attack Iran for those reasons... America talks about spreading democracy but supports dictators and very rarely helps out the oppressed....
Tronic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2006, 13:10 PM   #9 (permalink)
highsea
Defense Professional
 
highsea's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-10-04
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,478
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tronic View Post
...America talks about spreading democracy but supports dictators and very rarely helps out the oppressed....
Yeah, It's all a smokescreen. We are secretly trying to establish dictatorships all around the world so we can oppress the poor more effectively.

We will only be happy when all the world's poor people are eating Alpo and Ralston Purina has the world monopoly on 'poor people food'.

__________________
My baby called me up. She said- Why don't you ever take me out? Pick me up in your brand new car....You shake the short change from the old fruit jar...
highsea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2006, 14:21 PM   #10 (permalink)
Amled
Senior Contributor
 
Amled's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-10-04
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,436
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tronic View Post
... but I very much doubt America will attack Iran for those reasons... America talks about spreading democracy but supports dictators and very rarely helps out the oppressed....
Tell me Tronic does it really matters why the US brings down a tyrannical regime?
Be it out of enlightened self interest or for phrases like democracy, freedom and the like?
It may be that some of the powers-that-be in Washington had ulterior motives in bringing about regime change in Iraq. I don’t know, as a layman sitting in an apartment in Denmark I’m not privy to what goes on behind closed doors on the Potomac.
But one thing that I am sure of; and call me naive, that is the American servicemen who make up the bulk of the forces presently there, and are incurring the greatest losses aren’t doing it for Corporate America.
You just have to read the what is written on this board and others, hear what say and mean publicly and privately to understand that many of them do believe intensely in those seemingly trite phrases freedom, democracy and the like.
And if; and we can only hope not, it comes to hostilities with Iran it will be the same.
Amled is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2006, 15:59 PM   #11 (permalink)
Tronic
Navajo Code Talker
Senior Contributor
 
Tronic's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-27-04
Location: Patiala, India
Posts: 5,288
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by highsea View Post
Yeah, It's all a smokescreen. We are secretly trying to establish dictatorships all around the world so we can oppress the poor more effectively.

We will only be happy when all the world's poor people are eating Alpo and Ralston Purina has the world monopoly on 'poor people food'.

If a country doesn't help the oppressed; that means it goes against them??? lol... like Bush's statement, "If you're not with us, you're against us."

I said, America doesn care about the oppressed... I didn't say that America loves going around the world, oppressing people on purpose... and re: dictators... dictators are supported if they fit a national interest and most times they do... so if they oppress their own people or love them, it does not matter......

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amled
Tell me Tronic does it really matters why the US brings down a tyrannical regime?
Be it out of enlightened self interest or for phrases like democracy, freedom and the like?
It may be that some of the powers-that-be in Washington had ulterior motives in bringing about regime change in Iraq. I don’t know, as a layman sitting in an apartment in Denmark I’m not privy to what goes on behind closed doors on the Potomac.
But one thing that I am sure of; and call me naive, that is the American servicemen who make up the bulk of the forces presently there, and are incurring the greatest losses aren’t doing it for Corporate America.
You just have to read the what is written on this board and others, hear what say and mean publicly and privately to understand that many of them do believe intensely in those seemingly trite phrases freedom, democracy and the like.
And if; and we can only hope not, it comes to hostilities with Iran it will be the same.
I was just trying to say that pray that the Mullahs do something very wrong, like publicly build nukes and declare war on America... cuz something like that is what will get the Mullahs toppled... Not American affection for the Iranian people... I'm not blaming America... every country in the world works for its own national interest...
Tronic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2006, 19:02 PM   #12 (permalink)
Amled
Senior Contributor
 
Amled's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-10-04
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,436
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tronic View Post
I was just trying to say that pray that the Mullahs do something very wrong, like publicly build nukes and declare war on America... cuz something like that is what will get the Mullahs toppled...
The Iranian leadership has to date bent over backwards to dissuade everyone that they are aiming to produce nuclear weapons. So I don’t think we have to worry about them going public with their intentions. I doubt seriously that they will ever go public with such an announcement until they were able to unveil a working weaponised device.
In that event the broad population would probably fall in behind them, as happened in India and Pakistan when they unveiled theirs. All they would have to do would be proclaim them “purely defensive weapons”.
A disclaimer you can believe or not.
I choose not to!
Amled is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2006, 04:00 AM   #13 (permalink)
Ray
Postmaster General
Military Professional
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 26,149
Country:
I agree it will take time for the Iranian people to realise the folly of their Mullah leaders.

The Iranian people are not stupid.

It is just that they have had a very turbulent history and that turbulence is continuing with this leadership that they have.
Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2006, 14:06 PM   #14 (permalink)
Amled
Senior Contributor
 
Amled's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-10-04
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,436
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray View Post
...The Iranian people are not stupid...
I agree with you on that 100%.
They; and thereby Iran, probably have the greates potential of any nation in the ME to become the dominant power in that region.
The question therefor arises, will Ahmadinejad (or an equally uncompromising radical sucessor) together with the Mad Mullahs be in power when that happens?
Amled is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2006, 14:29 PM   #15 (permalink)
Tronic
Navajo Code Talker
Senior Contributor
 
Tronic's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-27-04
Location: Patiala, India
Posts: 5,288
Country:
one question... its not related to this issue... but just out of curiosity, does anyone know why and how Iran was named Iran... I think Persia was a much more culturally powerful civilization and they should've hanged on with the name Persia.... I don't know how the name "Iran" came about... just out of curiosity...
Tronic is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Iran Is Playing a Growing Role in Iraq Economy xerxes Current Affairs 0 03-21-2007 13:00 PM
What War With Iran Would Look Like astralis Political Discussions 0 09-17-2006 16:52 PM
Iran And Possible Developments Gazi The Iranian Question 2 02-26-2006 12:02 PM
Why use force when talk works so well? Leader International Defense Topics 54 12-05-2005 04:29 AM
A Preemptive Attack on Iran's Nuclear Facilities: Possible Consequences lulldapull International Defense Topics 14 11-20-2004 16:27 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:55 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8