ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > International Strategic Affairs > The Iranian Question
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 08-25-2006, 15:58 PM   #16 (permalink)
Tronic
Navajo Code Talker
Senior Contributor
 
Tronic's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-27-04
Location: Patiala, India
Posts: 5,245
Country:
well... its better then having our agencies tell us tommorow... sorry folks... they have the bomb...

and I say all we need now is major money put into other sources of energy... lets face it, we're killing the planet, and killing it fast....
__________________
Nabha Sparasham Deeptam
-Touch The Sky With Glory
Tronic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2006, 21:07 PM   #17 (permalink)
Julie
Moderator
 
Julie's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-04-03
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 6,306
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by M21Sniper
That is without a doubt the smartest and most devious military suggestion/observation you've ever made on this forum miss.

Ku-freakin-Do's.
{curtsy, curtsy}....I'm honored for your reply.

The best part to me is the oil company ceo's would literally shiit in their pants if we did that.

If it were me making the call......that's what I would do....in a heartbeat.
Julie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2006, 05:53 AM   #18 (permalink)
Ray
Postmaster General
Military Professional
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 25,693
Country:
Cannamore,

Alaskan oil extraction has a great price to pay in ecology.

While it may make economic sense, it may not make sense in the long run.

I rather go with Sniper. Dry out the Arab oil and gas. That is their sole blackmail weapon.

Oil gone, these Sheiks and their subjects become the dirty little ill clad Bedous that they are!

Even the remainder of the Islamic world will heave a sigh of relief, having been liberated from the clutches of these Wahhabi vermin!
__________________


"Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

HAKUNA MATATA

Last edited by Ray : 08-26-2006 at 05:56 AM.
Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2006, 13:46 PM   #19 (permalink)
GVChamp
Patron
 
GVChamp's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-25-06
Location: Chicago
Posts: 244
Attacking Iran's oil facilities actually makes a hell of a lot more sense than attacking nuclear facilities now that I think about it.

That's shutting down about 15% of the Iranian economy and something like 80% of its exports. Shutting down that means shutting down the flow of hard currency, which means no more pretty new artillery shells and definitely a lot harder time to trying to modernize its own economy. Slap some sanctions on the country, throw in their massive government deficits (which are only going to get larger), double-digit inflation which will only rise with the deficits, and the problems they have been having with their privatization efforts, and the Iranian economy is going nowhere fast. No economy=no threat, and could even mean revolution or reform.

Too bad that the best course of action is the one that would make everyone absolutely nuts.
__________________
"The great questions of the day will not be settled by means of speeches and majority decisions but by iron and blood"-Otto Von Bismarck
GVChamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2006, 14:15 PM   #20 (permalink)
Ray
Postmaster General
Military Professional
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 25,693
Country:
Blasted exiles!

I don't trust any turncoat.

I would check the news myself and that is what the US should do rather than listen to these fools.

Iraqi exiles and their rosy pictures of chaps waiting with garlands should be a warning!

Never trust an Arab carpet seller or even a Persian (Iranian) carpet seller!

They will always overbid and sell worthless stuff as heritage articles!

I know a Kashmiri artifact shop owner. He says his best customers are Americans and they are so profitably gullible!
Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2006, 16:17 PM   #21 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by GVChamp
Attacking Iran's oil facilities actually makes a hell of a lot more sense than attacking nuclear facilities now that I think about it.
Attacking both makes even more sense still.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2006, 16:40 PM   #22 (permalink)
Ray
Postmaster General
Military Professional
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 25,693
Country:
Nuclear facility is what is the sore point.

Oil, the world and the US requires!
Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2006, 17:16 PM   #23 (permalink)
GVChamp
Patron
 
GVChamp's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-25-06
Location: Chicago
Posts: 244
Quote:
Originally Posted by M21Sniper
Attacking both makes even more sense still.
That it would. It'd be mighty tough to replace equipment and scientists under normal circumstances, but trying to do it with no money would be a nightmare.
But how good is the intelligence on Iran's nuclear program? My limited knowledge is that it is dispersed, underground to a large extent, and close to civilians in many cases. That makes it difficult to:
A. Hit it
B. Determine what each individual base is doing and how important each is to the overall operation.


I'd rather send out only a few air raids to hit more important facilities as opposed to 50 in an attempt to grind the entire program into dust. Both, I would think, would accomplish our goal of stopping Iran from getting a nuclear weapon any time soon.

Too bad my college education is in economics and not nuclear engineering.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray
Oil, the world and the US requires!
We sure need oil, and bombing oil facilities would probably set back worldwide oil production for a LONG time. But Iran will be hurting a lot worse than us.
GVChamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2006, 03:48 AM   #24 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by GVChamp
That it would. It'd be mighty tough to replace equipment and scientists under normal circumstances, but trying to do it with no money would be a nightmare.
But how good is the intelligence on Iran's nuclear program? My limited knowledge is that it is dispersed, underground to a large extent, and close to civilians in many cases. That makes it difficult to:
A. Hit it
B. Determine what each individual base is doing and how important each is to the overall operation.
As i have speculated in the past, if they cannot power a lightbulb, then their nuclear ambitons become almost irrelevant.

If i'm in charge, we're bombing everything i can find that's worth the effort.

Dams, oil facilities, bridges, electrical grids, all advanced industry, everything.

My solution is simple.

Either they surrender, or the JDAM fairy cometh nightly until they change their minds, or until there are none of them left to change their minds.

"By the time we're done with the bastards Japanese will be a language spoken only in Hell".
~General Curtis LeMay

Last edited by Anon : 08-27-2006 at 03:52 AM.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2006, 04:12 AM   #25 (permalink)
Ray
Postmaster General
Military Professional
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 25,693
Country:
What have you got against the Japanese, Sniper.

Your Japanese car not performing well?
Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2006, 04:29 AM   #26 (permalink)
Monk
Cultural Attache
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-29-05
Location: Muscat, Oman
Posts: 1,275
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canmoore
Well yes extracting the Oil from the sand is expensive, however with more investment, and as technology progresses, it will become less and less expensive. And the Athabasca tar sands are not in the Arctic, it is in northern Alberta, however it is just south of the Arctic circle.

And lets face it, there are somethings that the tree huggers cannot stop, one thing they cannot stop is the need for Oil. And Canada has lots of it, enough to feed the entire world untill we find a better source of energy. The only question is, how hard are you willing to work for that oil? Sure middle east oil is cheaper, but do you really want all that baggage that comes along with it?
Sit on the oil for abt 40yrs. Let the towel heads run dry. Then release the oil on the market and watch them having to buy from you to satisfy their energy needs. I am waiting for this moment. I have known abt the canadian oil for years and always thought that was going to be the strategy,
Fukk this biatch ass towel heads!!!
__________________
"Many forms of Government have been tried, and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of Government except all those others that have been tried from time to time. "

"Although prepared for martyrdom, I preferred that it be postponed."

Sir Winston Churchill
Monk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2006, 04:31 AM   #27 (permalink)
Monk
Cultural Attache
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-29-05
Location: Muscat, Oman
Posts: 1,275
Quote:
Originally Posted by M21Sniper
That is without a doubt the smartest and most devious military suggestion/observation you've ever made on this forum miss.

Ku-freakin-Do's.
She was always the smartest lady here M21 (and THL too).
Monk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2006, 04:33 AM   #28 (permalink)
Monk
Cultural Attache
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-29-05
Location: Muscat, Oman
Posts: 1,275
There was a time I was a strong supporter of Iran. On this very forum I have debated several boarders abt the error of bombing Iran.

I no longer feel the conviction to do so.

Ready, take aim,........................
Monk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2006, 09:24 AM   #29 (permalink)
Bluesman
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Bluesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Vacaville, CA.
Posts: 7,350
Country:
Our future, if the Democrats' fortunes wax:
__________________
"The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it, and if one finds the prospect of a long war intolerable, it is natural to disbelieve in the possibility of victory."
- George Orwell

Last edited by Bluesman : 12-15-2006 at 13:12 PM.
Bluesman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2006, 09:25 AM   #30 (permalink)
Bluesman
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Bluesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Vacaville, CA.
Posts: 7,350
Country:
One small inaccuracy with that last panel. Can anyone tell me what it is? (Almighty snark inbound at high speed...)
Bluesman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
US preparing to nuke Iran Ray Political Discussions 149 04-15-2006 22:40 PM
Iran Is Judged 10 Years From Nuclear Bomb Shek The Iranian Question 63 12-09-2005 21:23 PM
Why use force when talk works so well? Leader International Defense Topics 54 12-05-2005 04:29 AM
An Article worthy of Lull..... MIKEMUN Political Discussions 2 03-18-2005 20:04 PM
US's $5 billion nuclear gamble with China Ray The Western Alliance 0 03-14-2005 04:53 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:21 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8