![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Banished
|
Hello it's again time to use our over active imaginations to try and make out a little scenario for our own entertainment and mental growth. I'm setting the scene...
It's October 2006, The USA has finally grown tired of Iranian words and attempts to get the bomb. They launched a covert airstrike on Iranian nuclear facilities. It wiped them out entirely. The us got in and out without any losses, they had complete air supremeacy at the time so no planes where lost. The mission was hailed as a success by hawks and condemned by europeans and liberals alike. However Iran did not take this lying down, they retaliated with a strike against US troops in Baghdad by firing missile at thier compounds, they fired some shots at bases in Saudi Arabia, miraculously nobody was killed in the attacks due to the poor acuracy of the missiles and the luck of US forces. Now a reply is essential, America is fuming, the world on edge, political leaders have okayed an invasin, they don't want another air strike or Kosovo style campaign, they need you to take them out, an invasion is must, however the last call is yours. What do you do? Factors
What i need to know is would you go to war, what you think it'd be like and if you think you'd win what would you do with Iran afterwards? Please can we avoid... [insert thick southern accent] "i'd nuke the ba5tards" [end accent]. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Regular
|
Quote:
Obviously, the Iranians will see the error of their ways. They will quickly realise that what they really want is to watch Britney Spears videos in McDonalds all day. They will therefore obviously not conduct a bloody guerilla campaign against an occupying army, the American public will not rapidly lose their stomach for spreading 'freedom' in the face of mounting US casualties, and US companies will not win lucrative reconstruction contracts. The world will become a better place, and everybody will happily ever after. After all, isn't this what past experience teaches us? Last edited by Popgun : 04-14-2006 at 19:55 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
New Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Staff Emeritus
|
Go olde skool on 'em. Bomb 'em 24/7/365. Primary targets, all military forces, and political leaders, from community leaders up. Any attempt to retaliate, any move towards a border, and all infrastructure targets become viable. Any successful retaliation, or penetration of a border, and carpet bombers start targeting cities. The only options for ending the seige, total surrender, or total anarchy...
Quote:
__________________
No man is free until all men are free - John Hossack I agree completely with this Administration’s goal of a regime change in Iraq-John Kerry even if that enforcement is mostly at the hands of the United States, a right we retain even if the Security Council fails to act-John Kerry He may even miscalculate and slide these weapons off to terrorist groups to invite them to be a surrogate to use them against the United States. It’s the miscalculation that poses the greatest threat-John Kerry |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,365
Country:
|
Quote:
The funny thing is all the "wild-eyed neocons" that you think are here will be the first to tell you we won't invade. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Senior Contributor
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,365
Country:
|
Back to the original thread.
They lob missiles at us, we'll lob some back. They march into Iraq, we'll annihilate them. There's no need to invade. It doesn't serve our interest. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,365
Country:
|
Quote:
I think it means a war monger conservative. Not sure if it includes the "evangelical christian" part or not. It's quite a handy term though. Like how we call them liberals or libs. Neocon has that zing to it. It sounds serious and scary. Good to scared the uninformed masses. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,365
Country:
|
Quote:
I don't think there's a need to put boots on the ground. Air supremecy should be good enough after we take out all their nuke facilities. We don't even need them to surrender. Demanding something means they have something we want (cooperation, surrender...etc.). We'll just bomb them every now and then to make sure they stay in line, but demand nothing from them. It's just the way it is. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ‘US had designs on Iran before Iraq invasion’ | Ray | The Iranian Question | 10 | 05-01-2008 12:29 PM |
| Indian Army transformation | Ray | South Asian Defense Topics | 36 | 12-22-2005 02:00 AM |
| Quagmire or not? | Shek | The War in Iraq | 72 | 07-04-2005 12:18 PM |
| An Article worthy of Lull..... | MIKEMUN | Political Discussions | 2 | 03-18-2005 20:04 PM |
| Why we are losing the war on terror | lulldapull | International Defense Topics | 114 | 11-20-2004 00:55 AM |