War on Iran - Page 5

Ray · 04-17-2006, 08:00 AM

Platinum,

Of course,Tronic is a Sikh.

Baisaki mubarak to him

It is also Bengali News Year, so why are you not wishing us Poila Baisaker pronam?

You are being a real racist!

Ray · 04-17-2006, 08:04 AM

Confed,

But one nuke would do the job of 10,000 bombs and no matter how much Bush may call it as being in the "fanatasy" zone, I am sure at least one is trained on Iran for emergency!

Hopefully, it should never be used!

platinum786 · 04-17-2006, 09:09 AM

right now i think the problem is wider than the governemnt or armies, there are generation rasied on hating you guys....and people pretty intet on having the right to have nulear power and weapons.

i mean think of it this way....if ur swedish and u want to have a nuclear weapon, sy shouldn't you, other countries do....it's the ultimate safety....having the ability to reak such havoc.

lwarmonger · 04-17-2006, 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by platinum786

i mean think of it this way....if ur swedish and u want to have a nuclear weapon, sy shouldn't you, other countries do....it's the ultimate safety....having the ability to reak such havoc.

But it is also a deniable weapon. Once a credible deterrent has been built up, give one to Hezbollah... bye bye Tel Aviv. "We don't know where that nuke came from!" "How could you possibly blame little old Iran?"

It probably wouldn't work (Israel wouldn't particularly care about acquiring proof anyways), but some Supreme Leader down the road might delude himself into thinking that it could work.

Lahori paa jee · 04-17-2006, 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by platinum786

right now i think the problem is wider than the governemnt or armies, there are generation rasied on hating you guys....and people pretty intet on having the right to have nulear power and weapons.

i mean think of it this way....if ur swedish and u want to have a nuclear weapon, sy shouldn't you, other countries do....it's the ultimate safety....having the ability to reak such havoc.

El Baradei congratulated US-India nuclear deal and condemns Irans nuclear programme. What an inequality. There is a country who has not signed any non proliferation treaty, was the first one in 1998 to carry out tests, who in 1974 tested dispite international pressure not to test and Indian scientists were involved in Irans nuclear proliferation (of course AQK too). These injustices might be the reason for Irans hate

Confed999 · 04-17-2006, 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ray

I am sure at least one is trained on Iran for emergency!

Hopefully there are enough to glass the whole country in a retaliatory strike.

Quote:

Originally Posted by platinum786

right now i think the problem is wider than the governemnt or armies, there are generation rasied on hating you guys....

This raising was encouraged by... Correct, the leaders, from community on up.

Quote:

Originally Posted by platinum786

and people pretty intet on having the right to have nulear power and weapons.

Try to build either without a government or army.

Quote:

Originally Posted by platinum786

having the ability to reak such havoc.

Exactly why those who call for the total destruction, total genocide, of others should not be allowed to have them.

**Shek** · 04-17-2006, 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lahori Paa jee

El Baradei congratulated US-India nuclear deal and condemns Irans nuclear programme. What an inequality. There is a country who has not signed any non proliferation treaty, was the first one in 1998 to carry out tests, who in 1974 tested dispite international pressure not to test and Indian scientists were involved in Irans nuclear proliferation (of course AQK too). These injustices might be the reason for Irans hate

What you are describing sounds quite similar to a kid that doesn't get the candy that is strategically located at the checkout counter of the grocery store and starts making a big scene.

**Shek** · 04-17-2006, 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lahori Paa jee

El Baradei congratulated US-India nuclear deal and condemns Irans nuclear programme. What an inequality. There is a country who has not signed any non proliferation treaty, was the first one in 1998 to carry out tests, who in 1974 tested dispite international pressure not to test and Indian scientists were involved in Irans nuclear proliferation (of course AQK too). These injustices might be the reason for Irans hate

Is India a state sponsor of terrorism? Has India called for the destruction of another nation-state? As a non-signatory of the NPT, how is India subject its provisions?

Anon · 04-17-2006, 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by platinum786

what would the bombing fix? it'd just aggrevate them.

It would also greatly defer the problem.

If we keep blowing it up they'll have to keep re-building it, and it is much quicker and cheaper to blow something up than to build it, and the US has a lot more money to play that game...

Anon · 04-17-2006, 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by platinum786

right now i think the problem is wider than the governemnt or armies, there are generation rasied on hating you guys...

Don't worry, we hate them back almost as much.

Quote:

Originally Posted by platinum786

..and people pretty intet on having the right to have nulear power and weapons. i mean think of it this way....if ur swedish and u want to have a nuclear weapon, sy shouldn't you, other countries do....it's the ultimate safety....having the ability to reak such havoc.

No one said the world is fair.

I wish i was born a billionaires son. Say la vie.

Here's something for you to consider though Plat. The "White nations" that don't have nukes WANT ALL NUKES GONE.

Interesting contrast, eh?

Anon · 04-17-2006, 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lwarmonger

But it is also a deniable weapon. Once a credible deterrent has been built up, give one to Hezbollah... bye bye Tel Aviv. "We don't know where that nuke came from!" "How could you possibly blame little old Iran?"

It probably wouldn't work (Israel wouldn't particularly care about acquiring proof anyways), but some Supreme Leader down the road might delude himself into thinking that it could work.

Fissile material is EXTREMELY tracable......or so i am told.

platinum786 · 04-17-2006, 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shek

Is India a state sponsor of terrorism?

Baloucistan trouble in Pakistan
http://www.jang.com.pk/thenews/apr20...ain/main11.htm
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default...6-4-2006_pg1_4
http://www.nation.com.pk/daily/april-2006/11/index3.php
http://www.nation.com.pk/daily/mar-2006/18/index11.php

Quote:

Has India called for the destruction of another nation-state?

google it, they have politicans today who demand they take over and make one big country again.

2/3 ain't bad.

but if that isn't good enough check this out too...

http://www.dawn.com/2006/03/15/top6.htm
http://www.theage.com.au/news/world/...701733536.html

I'm not backing Iran in the nuclear dispute all i'm saying is in India you have a nation who has always been soviet backed, has wanted to take out Pakistan, is actively involved in funding terrorist organisations in Pakistan, is neck deep in nuclear proliferation and is full of people wanting to wage war on it's nuclear neghbour to amke a great empire again.

Ray · 04-17-2006, 13:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lahori Paa jee

El Baradei congratulated US-India nuclear deal and condemns Irans nuclear programme. What an inequality. There is a country who has not signed any non proliferation treaty, was the first one in 1998 to carry out tests, who in 1974 tested dispite international pressure not to test and Indian scientists were involved in Irans nuclear proliferation (of course AQK too). These injustices might be the reason for Irans hate

El Baradei is a wise man!

Indians weren't involved in the Iranian nuclear project unless you consider AQ Khan, the friendly neighbourhood nuclear peddler to be an Indian!

Ray · 04-17-2006, 13:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by platinum786

Baloucistan trouble in Pakistan
http://www.jang.com.pk/thenews/apr20...ain/main11.htm
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default...6-4-2006_pg1_4
http://www.nation.com.pk/daily/april-2006/11/index3.php
http://www.nation.com.pk/daily/mar-2006/18/index11.php

google it, they have politicans today who demand they take over and make one big country again.

2/3 ain't bad.

but if that isn't good enough check this out too...

http://www.dawn.com/2006/03/15/top6.htm
http://www.theage.com.au/news/world/...701733536.html

I'm not backing Iran in the nuclear dispute all i'm saying is in India you have a nation who has always been soviet backed, has wanted to take out Pakistan, is actively involved in funding terrorist organisations in Pakistan, is neck deep in nuclear proliferation and is full of people wanting to wage war on it's nuclear neghbour to amke a great empire again.

Balochistan freedom move created by India?

The proof?

Some Pakistani newspapers? Very credible sources one must say!

Who is using the army whole hog to stop the insurrection in Balochistan, NWFP and Northern Areas? India?

Who is stealing from Balochistan and not giving them their due in revenues for the gas, gold and copper? India?

But then, it is typical of you Islamic apologists (I am being polite) mentality and psyche to blame others for the problems cause by yourself!

What has India to gain if Balochis kick the Pakistani Punjabis who are looting Pakistan wholesale?

What has India to gain when Sunnis massacre the Shias in the Northern Areas?

So, find some credible sources and then come back!

Cut out your fantasy whine.

Compare it to Kashmir where Pakistan is playing the major role! It has been proved by the world and not the Indian media. Further, camps in Paksitan has been given to Pakistan and the world including satellite photos and one of the separatist leaders, Yasin Malik, has clearly stated that the Pakistan Minister Rashid has been funding and assisting terrorists! See South Asian forum.

So chum, you guys are empty vessels who make too much of noise!

**Lunatock** · 04-17-2006, 14:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by M21Sniper

Probably because it would be at least half expected a Muslim would blow himself up to make it happen.

Which is what makes Christians and Whites make those comments to begin with.

Hope it wouldn't be too much of a disapointment that I'd prefer using a 4.10 or .223 hunting rifle from hundreds of yards out, then transporting someone to a final resting place inside a hollowed out deer carcass...and in the back of a good samaritan's pickup.

04-17-2006, 08:00 AM	#61 (permalink)
Ray Postmaster General *Military Professional* Join Date: 08-20-03 Posts: 28,236 Country:	Platinum, Of course,Tronic is a Sikh. Baisaki mubarak to him It is also Bengali News Year, so why are you not wishing us Poila Baisaker pronam? You are being a real racist! __________________ "Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination." I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to. HAKUNA MATATA

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
‘US had designs on Iran before Iraq invasion’	Ray	The Iranian Question	10	05-01-2008 12:29 PM
Indian Army transformation	Ray	South Asian Defense Topics	36	12-22-2005 02:00 AM
Quagmire or not?	Shek	The War in Iraq	72	07-04-2005 12:18 PM
An Article worthy of Lull.....	MIKEMUN	Political Discussions	2	03-18-2005 20:04 PM
Why we are losing the war on terror	lulldapull	International Defense Topics	114	11-20-2004 00:55 AM

04-17-2006, 08:04 AM	#62 (permalink)
Ray Postmaster General *Military Professional* Join Date: 08-20-03 Posts: 28,236 Country:	Confed, But one nuke would do the job of 10,000 bombs and no matter how much Bush may call it as being in the "fanatasy" zone, I am sure at least one is trained on Iran for emergency! Hopefully, it should never be used!

04-17-2006, 09:09 AM	#63 (permalink)
platinum786 Banished Join Date: 06-14-04 Posts: 1,986	right now i think the problem is wider than the governemnt or armies, there are generation rasied on hating you guys....and people pretty intet on having the right to have nulear power and weapons. i mean think of it this way....if ur swedish and u want to have a nuclear weapon, sy shouldn't you, other countries do....it's the ultimate safety....having the ability to reak such havoc.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)