ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > International Strategic Affairs > The Iranian Question
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 04-14-2006, 23:18 PM   #16 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Popgun
I have no idea, but then I'm not a wild-eyed neocon.
Wow, yet another leftist invented term to demonize their opposition.

How original...
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 23:20 PM   #17 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut
I don't think there's a need to put boots on the ground. Air supremecy should be good enough after we take out all their nuke facilities. We don't even need them to surrender. Demanding something means they have something we want (cooperation, surrender...etc.). We'll just bomb them every now and then to make sure they stay in line, but demand nothing from them. It's just the way it is.
I agree ENTIRELY.

That is EXACTLY what i'd do, and i think.......i'd be doing it ALREADY.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2006, 07:51 AM   #18 (permalink)
Bluesman
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Bluesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Vacaville, CA.
Posts: 7,468
Country:
'Neo-con' is code for JOO, or their henchmen. Joos always have henchmen. Right, Poptart?
__________________
"The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it, and if one finds the prospect of a long war intolerable, it is natural to disbelieve in the possibility of victory."
- George Orwell
Bluesman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2006, 08:06 AM   #19 (permalink)
Popgun
Regular
 
Join Date: 04-09-06
Posts: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by Confed999
I still don't even know what a neocon actually is.
I suggest you try to find out, because a lot of your countrymen vote for them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by M21Sniper
Wow, yet another leftist invented term to demonize their opposition.

How original...
It was ‘invented’ to describe those who hold a certain set of beliefs which amount to a political ideology, not to demonize them. Through their own actions, they have proved themselves deserving of demonization.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluesman
Right, Poptart?
Pathetic.
Popgun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2006, 11:54 AM   #20 (permalink)
Confed999
Staff Emeritus
 
Confed999's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-10-03
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,681
Country:
Send a message via AIM to Confed999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Popgun
I suggest you try to find out, because a lot of your countrymen vote for them.



It was ‘invented’ to describe those who hold a certain set of beliefs which amount to a political ideology, not to demonize them. Through their own actions, they have proved themselves deserving of demonization.
ne·o·con·ser·va·tism also ne·o-con·ser·va·tism ( P ) Pronunciation Key (n-kn-sûrv-tzm)
n.
An intellectual and political movement in favor of political, economic, and social conservatism that arose in opposition to the perceived liberalism of the 1960s.
Neat, now I know what it is, but I still don't see any problems with that...

Honestly, I still think anyone who uses the term seriously is a nutter...
__________________
No man is free until all men are free - John Hossack
I agree completely with this Administration’s goal of a regime change in Iraq-John Kerry
even if that enforcement is mostly at the hands of the United States, a right we retain even if the Security Council fails to act-John Kerry
He may even miscalculate and slide these weapons off to terrorist groups to invite them to be a surrogate to use them against the United States. It’s the miscalculation that poses the greatest threat-John Kerry
Confed999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2006, 12:55 PM   #21 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Confed999
ne·o·con·ser·va·tism also ne·o-con·ser·va·tism ( P ) Pronunciation Key (n-kn-sûrv-tzm)
n.
An intellectual and political movement in favor of political, economic, and social conservatism that arose in opposition to the perceived liberalism of the 1960s.
Neat, now I know what it is, but I still don't see any problems with that...

Honestly, I still think anyone who uses the term seriously is a nutter...
I suppose i would be labeled as one of these ubiquitous "Neo-cons". So i wish to know, do we at least have a theme song?
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2006, 13:18 PM   #22 (permalink)
Bluesman
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Bluesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Vacaville, CA.
Posts: 7,468
Country:
I've noticed that lots of Brits say 'pathetic' when they run out of arguments. It's a lot like the Valley girl's 'Whatever', coupled with the eye roll. When intellectually bested, pretend to rise above it all with a dismissive word and gesture, thereby relieving you of the chore of unpainting yourself from your corner, but without actually admitting you've got no rejoinder or point to make.

Easy and clean. Dishonorable and weak, too, but always at hand.

Last edited by Bluesman : 04-15-2006 at 14:33 PM.
Bluesman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2006, 13:18 PM   #23 (permalink)
Bluesman
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Bluesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Vacaville, CA.
Posts: 7,468
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by M21Sniper
I suppose i would be labeled as one of these ubiquitous "Neo-cons". So i wish to know, do we at least have a theme song?
No, but you should see our cool treehouse.
Bluesman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2006, 13:23 PM   #24 (permalink)
Zhang Fei
Banished
 
Zhang Fei's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-04-05
Posts: 230
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Confed999
ne·o·con·ser·va·tism also ne·o-con·ser·va·tism ( P ) Pronunciation Key (n-kn-sûrv-tzm)
n.
An intellectual and political movement in favor of political, economic, and social conservatism that arose in opposition to the perceived liberalism of the 1960s.
I'm trying to figure out how that's different from traditional conservatism. The guys who are now calling themselves "realists" aren't actually realists. Actual realists got 100,000 Americans killed in Korea and Vietnam, invaded the Dominican Republic, Grenada and Panama and financed and spent tens of billions of dollars training and equipping anti-Communist forces all over the world. True realists occupied German and Japan for decades just in case the two countries decided to revert to their old ways and stationed medium range nukes in Europe over the protests of millions of European demonstrators. Realists don't pray for good outcomes - they plan for the worst-case scenario and act robustly to prevent them, even when the cost is tens of thousands of American lives.
Zhang Fei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2006, 13:34 PM   #25 (permalink)
Popgun
Regular
 
Join Date: 04-09-06
Posts: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluesman
I've noticed that lots of Brits say 'pathetic' when they run out of arguments. It's a lot like the Valley girl's 'Whatever', coupled with the eye roll. When intellectually bested, pretend to rise above it all with a dismissive word and gesture, thereby relieving you of the chore of unpainting yourself from your corner, but without actually admitting you've got no rejoinder or point to make.

Easy and clean. Dishonorable and weak, to, but always at hand.
If you think that changing my name from Popgun to Poptart is ‘intellectually besting’ me, then I say again – that is pathetic.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluesman
'Neo-con' is code for JOO, or their henchmen. Joos always have henchmen. Right, Poptart?
And, what does this mean exactly?
Popgun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2006, 13:36 PM   #26 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluesman
No, but you should see our cool treehouse.
WTF, we have a treehouse!?!?!?!?!?

I've oppressed my full quota of 3d world minorites dammit, why don't I get to play in the treehouse!?!?!?!

This sucks...

Tehehehehe.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2006, 13:38 PM   #27 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Popgun
And, what does this mean exactly?
To wit, apparently we are your intellectual superiors. I know exactly what it means.

You let me know if you change your mind about that tissue. I am feeling particularly compassionate on this fine day...

Last edited by Anon : 04-15-2006 at 13:47 PM.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2006, 13:44 PM   #28 (permalink)
Popgun
Regular
 
Join Date: 04-09-06
Posts: 32
I repeat - AGAIN - changing my name for a cheap laugh, which is what i called pathetic, is not 'intellectually besting' me.

You are missing the point sniper - I want to know what bluesman meant by this sentence:



Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluesman
'Neo-con' is code for JOO, or their henchmen. Joos always have henchmen. Right, Poptart?
Popgun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2006, 13:49 PM   #29 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Popgun
I repeat - AGAIN - changing my name for a cheap laugh, which is what i called pathetic, is not 'intellectually besting' me.

You are missing the point sniper - I want to know what bluesman meant by this sentence: 'Neo-con' is code for JOO, or their henchmen. Joos always have henchmen. Right, Poptart?
Ho hum...no, i WAS talking about that part.

Yield sir, our superiority is unassaillable...
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2006, 13:57 PM   #30 (permalink)
Shek
Military Professional
Moderator
 
Join Date: 02-23-05
Location: Krblachistan
Posts: 7,809
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zhang Fei
The guys who are now calling themselves "realists" aren't actually realists. Actual realists got 100,000 Americans killed in Korea and Vietnam, invaded the Dominican Republic, Grenada and Panama and financed and spent tens of billions of dollars training and equipping anti-Communist forces all over the world. True realists occupied German and Japan for decades just in case the two countries decided to revert to their old ways and stationed medium range nukes in Europe over the protests of millions of European demonstrators. Realists don't pray for good outcomes - they plan for the worst-case scenario and act robustly to prevent them, even when the cost is tens of thousands of American lives.
Not quite right. If you want to look at "true" realists, you need to look at Nixon-Kissinger-Ford and Bush 41. Detente, recognition of "red" China, and basic realpolitik define "Realism." "True" realists would have approached the Cold War from the perspective that Mr. X outlined in Foreign Affairs, not from the ideological perspective that actually emerged as defined by NSC-68, etc.
__________________
"So little pains do the vulgar take in the investigation of truth, accepting readily the first story that comes to hand." Thucydides 1.20.3
Shek is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
‘US had designs on Iran before Iraq invasion’ Ray The Iranian Question 10 05-01-2008 12:29 PM
Indian Army transformation Ray South Asian Defense Topics 36 12-22-2005 02:00 AM
Quagmire or not? Shek The War in Iraq 72 07-04-2005 12:18 PM
An Article worthy of Lull..... MIKEMUN Political Discussions 2 03-18-2005 20:04 PM
Why we are losing the war on terror lulldapull International Defense Topics 114 11-20-2004 00:55 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:11 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8