ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > International Strategic Affairs > The Iranian Question
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 02-14-2006, 16:50 PM   #16 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistoricalDavid
Could the USAAF and USN destroy Iran's nuclear 'capability' and their military infrastructure in a 'one-punch knockout' (To curtail the possibility of retalitation)?
No, it would have to be a 10,000 punch beat down.

Many, many thousands of combat sorties over many weeks.

The problem is finding the stuff to begin with. To say that the program is 'dispersed' would be a truly massive understatement.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2006, 16:52 PM   #17 (permalink)
HistoricalDavid
Distant Deeps or Skies
Senior Contributor
 
HistoricalDavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-19-05
Location: North London, UK
Posts: 2,009
Country:
Might the F/A-22 see action or is it still too early?

Quote:
Originally Posted by M21Sniper
The problem is finding the stuff to begin with. To say that the program is 'dispersed' would be a truly massive understatement.
That's what I thought, along with the fact that each site is probably quite well dug in, requiring more than one planeload of bombs to disable it.

Last edited by HistoricalDavid : 02-14-2006 at 17:01 PM.
HistoricalDavid is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2006, 17:56 PM   #18 (permalink)
astralis
Foreign Service
Moderator
Lei Feng Protege
 
Join Date: 08-23-05
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,948
Country:
confed999,

Quote:
It is never a mistake to remove a tyrant from power, never.
sorry, i disagree. to use an economist's terms, it is a mistake to do so when the opportunity costs of doing so exceeds the benefits.

to put it in another way,

everyone would like a new BMW. but if you pay $10,000,000 for a BMW...you've just made a mistake.
astralis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2006, 19:35 PM   #19 (permalink)
Horrido
Staff Emeritus
Chief Subversive
 
Horrido's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-04-03
Location: Secure, and undisclosed.
Posts: 979
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistoricalDavid
Might the F/A-22 see action or is it still too early?



That's what I thought, along with the fact that each site is probably quite well dug in, requiring more than one planeload of bombs to disable it.
I would imagine you would see the F-22 in the initial air supremecy and SEAD roles. They are technically active duty, now, and the military likes to get new equipment in for actual battlefield testing ASAP to see what works and what doesn't.
__________________
The black flag is raised: Ban them all... Let the Admin sort them out.

I know I'm going to have the last word... I have powers of deletion and lock.
Horrido is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2006, 22:27 PM   #20 (permalink)
Confed999
Staff Emeritus
 
Confed999's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-10-03
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,681
Country:
Send a message via AIM to Confed999
Quote:
Originally Posted by astralis
sorry, i disagree.
You're allowed to disagre. If you think money is more important than people, well, that's your gig. In terms of right and wrong though, you're making the mistake...
__________________
No man is free until all men are free - John Hossack
I agree completely with this Administration’s goal of a regime change in Iraq-John Kerry
even if that enforcement is mostly at the hands of the United States, a right we retain even if the Security Council fails to act-John Kerry
He may even miscalculate and slide these weapons off to terrorist groups to invite them to be a surrogate to use them against the United States. It’s the miscalculation that poses the greatest threat-John Kerry
Confed999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2006, 01:55 AM   #21 (permalink)
astralis
Foreign Service
Moderator
Lei Feng Protege
 
Join Date: 08-23-05
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,948
Country:
confed999,

Quote:
You're allowed to disagre. If you think money is more important than people, well, that's your gig. In terms of right and wrong though, you're making the mistake...
just because i used an economist's terms, doesn't mean it is about money. it's not about money. and you haven't really answered my argument, like i said, removing a dictator is certainly good, but at what cost?

in another historical sense,

getting rid of stalin would be good. but without stalin hitler wouldn't have been defeated.
astralis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2006, 01:59 AM   #22 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 15,918
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by astralis
getting rid of stalin would be good. but without stalin hitler wouldn't have been defeated.
I don't know if that would be correct. Churchill was determined to bring Hitler down.
__________________
Chimo
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2006, 02:16 AM   #23 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistoricalDavid
Might the F/A-22 see action or is it still too early?

It's operational, so sure, in fact, i am sure that it would be at the very tip of the Aerial spear.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2006, 02:17 AM   #24 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers
I don't know if that would be correct. Churchill was determined to bring Hitler down.
Hitler declared war on the US when the Japs attacked the US, so there is no way Hitler was going to be around for very long, Stalin or no Stalin, Churchill or no Churchill.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2006, 02:23 AM   #25 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 15,918
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by M21Sniper
Hitler declared war on the US when the Japs attacked the US, so there is no way Hitler was going to be around for very long, Stalin or no Stalin, Churchill or no Churchill.
Bill,

In all your research, have you ever read why Hitler declared war on the US? That's got to be the dumbest move of all dumb moves, even from that time period. Admiral Yamamotto read the US right. I find it hard that Hitler read the US so wrong.
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2006, 02:52 AM   #26 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers
Bill,

In all your research, have you ever read why Hitler declared war on the US? That's got to be the dumbest move of all dumb moves, even from that time period. Admiral Yamamotto read the US right. I find it hard that Hitler read the US so wrong.
The best i've ever come up with is that he was hoping that by declaring war on the US the Japanese would reciprocate and declare war on/attack the Soviets, thereby opening a second front.

Understandably the Japanese wanted no part of that, and this IMO caused them to stand pat, thereby leaving hitler flapping in the breeze with his prick in his hand.

Shek should have a good take on this, being a West pointy boy n'all.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2006, 10:49 AM   #27 (permalink)
Dreadnought
Senior Contributor
 
Dreadnought's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Posts: 5,330
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by M21Sniper
The best i've ever come up with is that he was hoping that by declaring war on the US the Japanese would reciprocate and declare war on/attack the Soviets, thereby opening a second front.

Understandably the Japanese wanted no part of that, and this IMO caused them to stand pat, thereby leaving hitler flapping in the breeze with his prick in his hand.

Shek should have a good take on this, being a West pointy boy n'all.
IMO Hitler could have literally been unstoppable had he and the Japanese done more for each other except share some military information. Hitler had no intention of declaring war until his newest capital ships were ready for the Kreigsmarine which would not have been until 44-45. He did however make the stupid move of invading poland which forced the British to declare war years earlier then Hitler anticipated. Good thing they did Hitler would have had an even more powerfull navy by the time 44-45 rolled around and quite possibly unstoppable.

Surprisingly the Japanese would not even share technology for the Yamatos with Germany. They kept Germany in the dark over their latest naval tecnology and being partners in a war facing the Allies i found that surprising. Leads me to believe they didnt trust one another very much even know they were on the very same team. As far as reasons why you guess is as good as mine.
Dreadnought is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2006, 10:53 AM   #28 (permalink)
Dreadnought
Senior Contributor
 
Dreadnought's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Posts: 5,330
Country:
Post

On the above topic. IMO dont bomb them. Grab the man with the mouth and his regime/mullahs and drop them in the heart of an Israeli slum. Then destroy their means to create weapons. Give the innocent time to evacuate. Dont create more casulties then what is necessary to do the job rite the first time. Because lord knows we and the west will be the bad guys all over again.

Last edited by Dreadnought : 02-15-2006 at 10:57 AM.
Dreadnought is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2006, 12:30 PM   #29 (permalink)
lwarmonger
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 02-08-05
Posts: 1,784
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreadnought
IMO Hitler could have literally been unstoppable had he and the Japanese done more for each other except share some military information. Hitler had no intention of declaring war until his newest capital ships were ready for the Kreigsmarine which would not have been until 44-45. He did however make the stupid move of invading poland which forced the British to declare war years earlier then Hitler anticipated. Good thing they did Hitler would have had an even more powerfull navy by the time 44-45 rolled around and quite possibly unstoppable.
No, Hitler's invasion of Poland was an economic necessity for him. Germany was critically short of foriegn currency at that point, and German expansionism was dictated largely by economic need (additional currency, raw materials, ect). Without conquest, Germany couldn't keep up its spending for very long, and the overheating economy would have collapsed long before 1944-45.

Quote:
Surprisingly the Japanese would not even share technology for the Yamatos with Germany. They kept Germany in the dark over their latest naval tecnology and being partners in a war facing the Allies i found that surprising. Leads me to believe they didnt trust one another very much even know they were on the very same team. As far as reasons why you guess is as good as mine.
Probably best for the Germans that the Japanese didn't share the Yamato ship designs with them. Hitler may have been inclined to build one or two, instead of mass producing much more useful equipment (like submarines).
lwarmonger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2006, 12:42 PM   #30 (permalink)
Dreadnought
Senior Contributor
 
Dreadnought's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Posts: 5,330
Country:
No, Hitler's invasion of Poland was an economic necessity for him. Germany was critically short of foriegn currency at that point, and German expansionism was dictated largely by economic need (additional currency, raw materials, ect). Without conquest, Germany couldn't keep up its spending for very long, and the overheating economy would have collapsed long before 1944-45.

Agreed he needed money and resources to power the ever growing war machine he created. But from what I have read he didnt want to go to war with England until his ultimate Navy was ready. The invasion of Poland completely changed this as Englad declared war. Thank God he didnt get the time to build it. However the amount of subs Germany had made operational during those years was staggering and they extracted a very large toll on the Brits and Allies men and supplies. Just think of how much equipment still to this day sits at the bottom from convoy attacks by subs,raiders,planes.
Dreadnought is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What War With Iran Would Look Like astralis Political Discussions 0 09-17-2006 16:52 PM
Iran And Possible Developments Gazi The Iranian Question 2 02-26-2006 12:02 PM
Iran to be refered to U.N. Security Council Dreadnought Political Discussions 13 01-16-2006 15:14 PM
Why use force when talk works so well? Leader International Defense Topics 54 12-05-2005 04:29 AM
A Preemptive Attack on Iran's Nuclear Facilities: Possible Consequences lulldapull International Defense Topics 14 11-20-2004 16:27 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:53 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8