ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > International Strategic Affairs > The Iranian Question
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
Old 02-01-2006, 17:48 PM   #1 (permalink)
Defcon 6
Contributor
 
Join Date: 09-12-05
Location: Illinois, U.S
Posts: 659
Iran to resist U.N bullies

TEHRAN, Iran (Feb. 1) - Iran's president lashed out Wednesday at the United States and vowed to resist the pressure of "bully countries" as European nations circulated a draft resolution urging that Tehran be brought before the U.N. Security Council for its nuclear activities.

In a speech to thousands of supporters hours after President Bush's State of the Union address, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad derided the United States as a "hollow superpower" that is "tainted with the blood of nations" and said Tehran would continue its nuclear program.

"Nuclear energy is our right, and we will resist until this right is fully realized," Ahmadinejad told the crowd in the southern Iran city of Bushehr, the site of Iran's only nuclear power plant.

"Our nation can't give in to the coercion of some bully countries who imagine they are the whole world and see themselves equal to the entire globe," he added.

The crowd responded with chants of "Nuclear energy is our right!"

Iran's top nuclear negotiator, Ali Larijani, said at a news conference that it would halt intrusive U.N. inspections of its nuclear facilities and resume large-scale enrichment of uranium if it is taken before the U.N. Security Council.

Larijani also said Iran remains committed to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, despite calls from hard-line newspapers to withdraw from the agreement if the International Atomic Energy Agency refers Iran to the Security Council on Thursday, as expected.

Referring to the IAEA meeting, he added: "In case the issue is reported or referred to the Security Council, we will have to stop implementation of the Additional Protocol" _ a procedure that allows IAEA inspectors to carry out intrusive searches of a country's nuclear facilities without warning.

"The result would be Iran's cooperating with the IAEA at a low level, which is against our wishes. All our suspensions on nuclear activities would be lifted," he said, meaning that Iran would feel free to enrich uranium without hindrance.

In Vienna, Austria, a draft IAEA resolution "requests the director general to report to the Security Council" on steps Iran needs to take to dispel fears that it might want to make nuclear arms. It was being circulated among the 35-member IAEA board for their comments before being submitted for approval at Thursday's board meeting, and a copy was made available to The Associated Press.

As those necessary steps, the draft calls on Iran to:

-- Re-establish a freeze on uranium enrichment and related activities.

-- Consider whether to stop construction of a heavy water reactor that could be the source of plutonium for weapons.

-- Formally ratify an agreement it has so far honored as if it were in force allowing the IAEA greater inspecting authority.

-- Give the IAEA additional power in its probe of Iran's nuclear program, including "access to individuals" for interviews, as well as to documentation on its black market nuclear purchases, equipment that could be used for nuclear and non-nuclear purposes and "certain military-owned workshops" where nuclear activities might be going on.

The draft also asks IAEA director general Mohamed ElBaradei to "convey to the Security Council" his report to the next board session in March along with any resolution that meeting might approve.

Ahmadinejad referred to Bush directly and the U.S.-led war in neighboring Iraq.

"Those whose hands are tainted with blood of nations and are involved in wars and oppression in any part of the world ... we, hopefully, in the near future will put you on trial in courts that will be set up by nations."

Defense Minister Gen. Mostafa Mohammad Najjar also warned all countries against considering an attack on Iran's nuclear installations. "Any attack against Iran's peaceful nuclear facilities will meet a swift and crushing response from the armed forces," Najjar said, according to the official Islamic Republic News Agency.

The comments came after Bush increased the pressure on Iran over its nuclear program, saying in his address Tuesday night that "the nations of the world must not permit the Iranian regime to gain nuclear weapons." He said the United States "will continue to rally the world to confront these threats."

Bush also said Iran was "held hostage by a small clerical elite that is isolating and repressing its people" and must stop sponsoring terrorists in the Palestinian territories and Lebanon.

British Prime Minister Tony Blair told the House of Commons on Wednesday it was crucial for the international community to "send a signal of strength" to Iran in the dispute.

"It is important that they understand ... that we are united in determining that they should not be able to carry on flouting their international obligations," he said.

The five permanent members of the Security Council agreed Tuesday that Iran should be hauled before the powerful body.

The top U.N body has the power to impose economic and political sanctions, but none of those measures is immediately likely. Under the deal agreed to by Moscow and Beijing _ previous opponents of referral -- the Security Council will likely await a new IAEA report at the next board meeting in March before deciding on substantive action, leaving more time for talks with Iran.

Iran insists its nuclear program is civilian only and has no other purpose than to generate power. Enrichment can produce either fuel for a nuclear reactor or the material needed to build a warhead.

On Tuesday, the IAEA said in a report that Iran obtained documents and drawings on the black market that serve no other purpose than to make an atomic warhead. The report also confirmed information recently provided by diplomats familiar with the Iran probe that Tehran has not started small-scale uranium enrichment since announcing it would earlier this month.

The findings about the design obtained by Iran on the black market were contained in a confidential report for presentation to the IAEA board and provided in full to the AP.

A three-year IAEA probe has not found firm evidence to back assertions by the United States and others that Iran's nuclear activities are a cover for an arms program but has not been able to dismiss such suspicions either.

First mention of the documents linked to constructing a nuclear warhead was made late last year in a longer IAEA report. At that time, the agency said only that they showed how to cast "enriched, natural and depleted uranium metal into hemispherical forms."

In the brief report obtained Tuesday, however, the agency said bluntly that the 15 pages of text and drawings showing how to cast fissile uranium into metal were "related to the fabrication of nuclear weapon components."

The report said the documents were under agency seal, meaning that IAEA experts should be able to re-examine them, but "Iran has declined a request to provide the agency with a copy."

The documents in question were given to Iran by members of the nuclear black market network, the IAEA said. Iran has claimed it did not ask for the documents but received them anyway as part of other black market purchases.

Associated Press Writer George Jahn contributed to this report from Vienna, Austria.


2/1/2006 07:56:32
Defcon 6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2006, 14:54 PM   #2 (permalink)
HistoricalDavid
Distant Deeps or Skies
Senior Contributor
 
HistoricalDavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-19-05
Location: North London, UK
Posts: 2,100
Country:
I know this is old, but it has some interesting wording; anyone can resist the UN, but few can resist an armada of USAF and USN strike aircraft and bombers.
HistoricalDavid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2006, 15:06 PM   #3 (permalink)
dalem
Lord High Hullabalooster
Senior Contributor
 
dalem's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Columbia Heights, MN
Posts: 8,566
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistoricalDavid
I know this is old, but it has some interesting wording; anyone can resist the UN, but few can resist an armada of USAF and USN strike aircraft and bombers.
Well, you still have to know where something is to destroy it.

And pissing off the Iranian people is not a great option to have to choose, even if you DO know where something is. Right now the Iranian people don't hate us and it would be a shame if we gave them a reason to.

-dale
dalem is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2006, 15:08 PM   #4 (permalink)
HistoricalDavid
Distant Deeps or Skies
Senior Contributor
 
HistoricalDavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-19-05
Location: North London, UK
Posts: 2,100
Country:
Obviously it's a last resort. Indeed, Iran is, I think, more urbanised, better educated and possibly less ethnically divided than Iraq and hence may have a better chance for liberal democracy. But in deciding, I'd want the West at the helm rather than the UN.
HistoricalDavid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2006, 15:09 PM   #5 (permalink)
dalem
Lord High Hullabalooster
Senior Contributor
 
dalem's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Columbia Heights, MN
Posts: 8,566
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistoricalDavid
Obviously it's a last resort. Indeed, Iran is, I think, more urbanised, better educated and possibly less ethnically divided than Iraq and hence may have a better chance for liberal democracy. But in deciding, I'd want the West at the helm rather than the UN.

Certainly.

-dale
dalem is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Iran Is Playing a Growing Role in Iraq Economy xerxes Current Affairs 0 03-21-2007 13:00 PM
What War With Iran Would Look Like astralis Political Discussions 0 09-17-2006 16:52 PM
Iran And Possible Developments Gazi The Iranian Question 2 02-26-2006 12:02 PM
An Article worthy of Lull..... MIKEMUN Political Discussions 2 03-18-2005 20:04 PM
A Preemptive Attack on Iran's Nuclear Facilities: Possible Consequences lulldapull International Defense Topics 14 11-20-2004 16:27 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:10 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8