![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#47 (permalink) | |
|
Banished
|
Quote:
Why did the US not do something concrete in the A Q A Khan affair when it became apparent that the ISI was involved. What was the US doing when the Koreans traded missile technology with Pakistan in return for Nuclear Help. Well like always US was busy safeguarding its interest. This so called excuse of a weapon turning up in wrong hands has no worth for many reasons. One being Pakistan already possesses bombs which they tried 2 sel secondly pakistan is not really a stable country. If it goes down tomm whats the chances of its nuclear power being in safe hands. Hence, this whole arguement of nuclear weapons in wrong hands has no value. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
Ok so lets revisit one point. Outside of this man in Iran have you ever heard of the leader of a world country calling for the inialiation of another country outrite over religious edicts? Lets not count Hitler in this either. This man fails to realize once the international community decides he will have absolutely zero choice in the matter. And more then likely a military strike is already sitting on somebodys drawing board and not necessarily the Americans if he chooses to ignore it. The international community will not allow this man to achieve this weapon after making these threats and that you can be assured of. He may build it and hide it. But there will be those watching for that opertune moment to strike. All of his saber rattling will make him look foolish when the smoke clears and his country is damaged not just infastructure wise but face wise in the international community. What was the US doing when the Koreans traded missile technology with Pakistan in return for Nuclear Help. What could it do trading technology is one thing building one for another country is something completely different. Pakistan took care of Khan. We do attempt to work together with Pakistan although we have had troubles on both sides. On top of that Kim never threatened another county especially over something religion based which has the world excited over this because of terrorism. And as you may have noticed not only is he quiet no but also sits at the bargaining table these days. Well like always US was busy safeguarding its interest. Unfortunately Gautam all of the troubles in the world land on our presidents desk wether we like it or not. We didnt ask for it. It somehow turns out that way. Trust me I wish we would close our boarders and stop all the aid we give and take care of America for a few years. But this we cannot do either as we have obligations to the global community. The argument of it falling into the wrong hands is a very important argument. Have you ever considered the old adage " He who wishes to yield power is not worthy of the power he would yield " And "He who wishes not to yield power is its righteous ruler ". We as men (as in the int. community which includes both me and you and everybody else) would be absolutely irresponsible to let this man gain the means to construct, threaten or detonate a nuclear weapon on this planets surface in the name of his religious beliefs. I believe they should be granted nuclear power for peaceful means. But this mans means are very far from peacefull and there isint anybody that can justify what he wants to anybody except his thelogian keepers. Last edited by Dreadnought : 02-01-2006 at 15:51 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 (permalink) | |
|
Cultural Attache
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
__________________
"Many forms of Government have been tried, and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of Government except all those others that have been tried from time to time. " "Although prepared for martyrdom, I preferred that it be postponed." Sir Winston Churchill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 (permalink) | |
|
Cultural Attache
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#51 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#52 (permalink) | ||
|
Military Professional
Moderator Scotch taster |
Quote:
Quote:
Which again comes to the point that until Iran officially withdraws from the NPT, you cannot compare the two.
__________________
Chimo |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#53 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
Last edited by Dreadnought : 02-01-2006 at 16:12 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 (permalink) | |
|
Cultural Attache
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 (permalink) | |
|
Banished
|
Quote:
Nice try but u urself gave up the arguement. When you said Pakistan took care of A Q Khan, I didn't get what exactly u were reffering 2. Were u refering 2 the house arrest order issues by Mushy uncle. Common this is way more serious than the Iranian issue . A Q A Khan was selling nuclear blueprints, does that ring any bell, meaning anyone with qualified personnel could have built a nuclear bomb and anyways Iran is still far away from building a nuclear bomb. If u can justify america's non-intervention in A Q A Khan affair, you yourself speak for the double standards. Much more is at stake here than an Iranian Nuclear Bomb. With regards to the comments made by Iranian President, well its not a hidden secret that he is a dickhead afterall. But lets put things in prespective, I have many jewish friends and I guess we all agree on the fact that Iran doesn't have the balls 2 face Israel. They know Israel will kick their ass to stone age which theys showed in the Arab-Israeli war. And let me make one thing clear, I myself am strongly against a nuclear Iran and in no way am supporting Iran. All I say is that just like every other country in the world (US, China, UK, Russia) have played each other for personal gains, so does India have a right to do the same. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 (permalink) | ||
|
Banished
|
Quote:
Quote:
So all Iran needs to do then is to declare the NPT agreement invalid. That should get the US off its back and put an end to all the brouhaha. But for some reason I dont think thats the issue here. NPT or no NPT the US still would have been gunning for Iran. The real reasons would be pretty close to what Dreadnought here articualtes : That they are evil people blah blah blah and they would blow up the entire world the minute nukes get into Irans hands. The legality or the validity of the NPT is of little real concern for me and its as much a swear word that "non-alignment" is for the Americans. Last edited by Vaman : 02-01-2006 at 16:54 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#57 (permalink) | |
|
Banished
|
Quote:
On another note, the Nuclear goodies on offer are NOT going to suffice India's energy needs anytime in the future. For gods sake, US's own energy output from nuclear energy as a proportion of overall energy consumed is dismally small. Exactly what do you think they would have had to offer us anyway? Last edited by Vaman : 02-01-2006 at 17:18 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 (permalink) | |
|
Tamizhanban
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
Rajesh Nair It would integrate the various components of the force Air Vice-Marshal D. N. Ganesh — Photo: T. Singaravelou PONDICHERRY: The Indian Air Force would come out with a "concept document" by next year for setting up an "aerospace group," Assistant Chief of Air Staff Air Vic-Marshal D.N. Ganesh said here on Wednesday. "The concept, which was mooted three years ago, has picked up momentum recently, and we are giving a thrust to it as part of the Air Force upgradation process," he said in an informal chat with The Hindu . Explaining the concept, he said, "It is an integration of various components of the Air Force. Our satellites, radars, communication systems, laboratories, low-flying aircraft, high-flying aircraft and helicopters would be integrated." This would be done taking into consideration various needs such as communication, reconnaissance and battlefield damage assessment. Concept document The concept document would provide guidelines on how to go about the process. "The formation would be significant in a war scenario," he said. The Air Forces of eight countries, including China, have similar systems and the IAF was studying some of the models. "Our men have already visited the United States and got a feel of their system. However, we would have our own model." On Air Chief Marshal S.P. Tyagi's visit to Sri Lanka, he said, "There is no hidden significance. His visit is not related to the escalation of tension in that country." On reports that the United Kingdom would stop the supply of spares of some aircraft, he said, "The IAF is not dependent on them. It will not have any impact on us. http://www.hindu.com/2006/02/02/stor...0206730500.htm
__________________
A grain of wheat eclipsed the sun of Adam !! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 (permalink) | |
|
Military Enthusiast
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 (permalink) | ||
|
Bandaid
Military Professional
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Cheers!...on the rocks!! |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Iran Is Playing a Growing Role in Iraq Economy | xerxes | Current Affairs | 0 | 03-21-2007 13:00 PM |
| What War With Iran Would Look Like | astralis | Political Discussions | 0 | 09-17-2006 16:52 PM |
| Iran And Possible Developments | Gazi | The Iranian Question | 2 | 02-26-2006 12:02 PM |
| Why use force when talk works so well? | Leader | International Defense Topics | 54 | 12-05-2005 04:29 AM |
| A Preemptive Attack on Iran's Nuclear Facilities: Possible Consequences | lulldapull | International Defense Topics | 14 | 11-20-2004 16:27 PM |