Originally Posted by Vaman
"Originally Posted by indianguy4u
this is perfectly acceptable,
But read this quote
If my understanding is right, then there is room for debate & research.
There certainly is room for debate and research which is why i psted the first article which ended the debate.
But no worries some developmental economists still debate it and there is nothing wrong in that and certainly if you can find their work and present your case, i would most welcome it."
"Verman, i have not used the words "you know nothing" blablabla because this is a forum and everyone's opinion counts.
I dont have much time to argue about something i do for a living on a daily basis, however i dont mind any comments and i respect and value each one of them. I have a million academic papers to back me up on the matter and would be willing to post them one by one due to time constraints, let us keep this friendly and impersonal."
but then came the passable quant skills comments from you and it became a personal thread, anyway i have no problems, there are critisisms to econometrics and there is nothing wrong with that, the paradox not being one of them however, anyway its done and let us move on.
Had you mentioned the famous Lucas critique about forecasting, i would have given you thekudos. Anyway take it easy and I hope that you continue to contribute on this thread. I am also presentin what academia believes and what the DOMINANT THEORY is out there supported by them, i did not make any of this up myself and i did not discredit development economics, i questioned their approach and had you read a recent paper, you would know what I am talking about.
take care



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

Share this thread with friends: